Jump to content

"OSx86", what's in a name?


bofors
 Share

33 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

When Apple announced the transition to x86 last year, "OSx86" was a natural way to combine "OS X" and "x86". Its meaning was clear and because there were no public versions available yet, "OSx86" implied a hacked version.

 

Things are different now. This site is no longer the "OSx86Project" and the public is running the x86 version of OS X. Moreover, I do not think new people here even know what the term "OSx86" means and its usuage seems to have fallen out of favor.

 

Do we need to find a new word to describe the hacked version of OS X that people run on PCs?

 

Or is it good enough to say something like "Jas' 10.4.8" or "hacked OS X"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not really a fan of the OSx86 name...I mean, in case anybody hasn't noticed over the past year and a half, An Intel chip means x86 whether or not the chip is in a Mac. Therefore, all Intel builds of OS X are x86, since they run on an Intel architecture!*

 

*Yes, I know that Intel produces non-x86 chips (Itanic for one). Not my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok.

lets say!

 

a Hackintosh is a machine that runs Mac OSx86

 

and a

 

Macintosh is a machine that runs Mac OS X

 

you can do that with every mac:

 

iMac -> iHack

MacBook -> HackBook (or HacBook)

MacBook Pro HackBook Pro (HacBook Pro)

 

Mac Pro -> Hack Pro (Hac Pro)

 

OSx86 is the OS of a Hackintosh :whistle:

and OS X of a Macintosh - PPC and Intel

 

Intel Macs can also be called Intel Macs or Macintel or something...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I call it Mac OS, since it is still Mac OS. We didn't retouch the user interface, we didn't change most of the under-the-hood assets, we only made it "compatible" - which is the goal of this project.

 

To me, the name "x86" primarily refers to the CPU - which also applies to real Intel Macs - and secondly to the name of the project.

 

On the hardware side, I like the name "Hackintosh". :whistle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember: Cheaper, Faster = Better

 

Not according to the old (and still very true) adage: cheap, fast, reliable - pick any two. Basically it means that if something is cheap and fast, then it is generally not reliable. If it is cheap and reliable, then it won't be fast, and if it is fast and reliable, it won't be cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...