#21
Posted 29 March 2007 - 07:35 AM
and yeah your right, I should really shell out for that £3000 copy of 2003 server or whatever it is for Tiger Server so I can learn how these things work for my course - like hell.
hence your both fascists and I dont really care if you think I'm a thief. Microsoft is worse than any of us. :-D
#22
Posted 29 March 2007 - 07:49 AM
#23
Posted 29 March 2007 - 08:09 AM
Usually you call people facist when you have no argument (some reading for you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law).I think its a bit stupid to suddenly sound of about piracy months after the thread effectively closed - esspecially on this forum.
and yeah your right, I should really shell out for that £3000 copy of 2003 server or whatever it is for Tiger Server so I can learn how these things work for my course - like hell.
hence your both fascists and I dont really care if you think I'm a thief. Microsoft is worse than any of us. :-D
Anyway, Microsoft is providing 180 days trial 2003 server for evaluation (if you need more than 180 days to learn how is working windows then you are stupid). So, yes, you are a thief.
Another thing, why learn a tool that Apple or Microsoft want to charge for even for an educational purpose ?
Just learn something else (*BSD, Solaris 10, Linux) and let them die with their stupidity.
And if it's really for your course, they should give you all the tools you need and not rely on piracy.
#24
Posted 29 March 2007 - 09:21 AM
But can you download a Lamborghini?When you want to buy a car, you don't STEAL a lamborghini, you just buy a car that fit your budget.
When you want to buy some food but you think it's too expensive, you don't STEAL it, you just buy another one.
#25
Posted 29 March 2007 - 09:36 AM
a bit off-topic, but if a supermodel was available to download, who wouldn't download her?
#26
Posted 29 March 2007 - 09:46 AM
You are just proving that if you was able to steal what you want, you would do so...
What a beautiful education ...
#27
Posted 29 March 2007 - 09:50 AM
in reference to Godwin's law - perhaps you would prefer to be compared more to Musolini? I understand your point with the 180 day trial of 2003 server, but my course is 3 years long. And they dont give us the tools we need as you put it. For example, the other day we learned about AD in Windows 2000 Server and that night I decided to go over it again, luckily I had a disc and code available.
As for learning Solaris/BSD/Linux instead I really wish I could combine my hobby and my uni course like that.
#28
Posted 27 April 2007 - 03:39 AM
#29
Posted 27 April 2007 - 10:59 AM
1. You can steal a lamborghini or a lada.
2. You can steal a copied lamborghini or lada
3. You can make your own copied lamborghini or lada
4. You can put a lamborghini tag on your lada or lada tag on your lamborghini
5. You can buy yourself a lamborghini or lada
Piracy of 'intellectual property' is more vague but,
1. It is not possible to steal it
2. It is possible to steal a copy of it (and to get closer to 1. you have to eliminate the originator)
3. It is possible to make your own copy of it
4. It is possible to call somthing else for the same
5. It is possible to buy 'rights'
And finally, if you sing a song someone else has composed (be it in your lamborghini or lada or in your shower) you are stealing according to the music industry, unless you have acquired the rights to do so (which in most cases you haven't as they are all 'all rights reserved').
#30
Posted 27 April 2007 - 02:27 PM
The most dangerous too.The best things in life are free!
#31
Posted 30 April 2007 - 03:30 AM
#32
Posted 06 May 2007 - 05:51 AM
But it's not a perfect world. Many large corporations make profits that can cause direct or indirect harm to people, the environment, and other companies. These companies can become world-spanning monopolies, or near monopolies with more power and influence than that of large States.
Drug companies, oil companies, and IT companies like Microsoft can lie, cheat, break the law, and cause great harm. They can become dangerous parasites and public enemies. They can, and will, become the new totalitarian state if we are no very careful. They face little effective opposition. The Linux and Open Source movement is one grass-roots alternative. Some governments are wising-up, and using solar power, or open source. But there are many defeats. The US department of Justice tried..several times to moderate Microsoft's anti-trust behaviour to a reasonable level IMHO, they failed utterly. People were too afraid of what would happen to blue-chip IT shares.
So some people fight back, with warez. If a large corporation cheats, it has a 1000 lawyers, and a billion dollar budget for legal defence. If a poor individual cheats, then they go to jail. Neither is "right".
So while I don't condone software piracy, I can't really condemn it either. Some are criminals, and maybe some are heros, it depends on the intent, more than anything.
I think that the vast majority of people will be honest and obey the law, if there is some sort of fairness in our legal and business world. But the fact of the matter, is that there is no reasonable fairness or justice in our capitalist economy. This is hurting honest businesses, people, and governments everywhere. The stock market has become corrupt, and our master. What used to be an efficient way of allocating resources for the common good is now a burden round all our necks. We are ruining the planet, and letting people die. Our freedoms are dying too, because if just a few big meg-corporations have control, then where is the free market???
It's like the terrorism debate. Terrorists are immoral, but that does not mean that some of them may have legitimate grievences. Most people do not strap explosives to their chests and blow themselves up for no good reason. Yes, a lot are crazy fanatics, but you have to ask how they got that way.
I think that society better start to take a long, hard look at itself, before we doom ourselves to perpetual war and slavery.
#33
Posted 17 June 2007 - 07:14 PM
No, just joking. In my opinion the context on this matter couldn't be explained any better!
#34
Posted 21 June 2007 - 06:30 AM
I rather read about what Leopard has or does not have to offer me from someone who is using it pirated or not, instead I get a batch of worthless dribble about stealing software.
What a complete waste of energy here.
#35
Posted 21 June 2007 - 04:32 PM
very informative and objectiv post.
#36
Posted 22 June 2007 - 11:36 PM
#37
Posted 25 June 2007 - 12:23 AM
Don't know in which country you are located but you are a shining example of the product of
an educational system infested by Marxists.
YOU ARE 180 DEGREES WRONG !!
#38
Posted 26 June 2007 - 12:11 AM
You really can't say that "all" companies are really hurt when using and not paying for their software.
A big software company here in south-west Germany, that makes a burning software for windows for example, does it most of its overturn with OEM licenses. Think about **** Express, that is shipped with the PC's from the supermarket, if you buy a new CD/DVD Writer, or a DVD-Player that supports **** Digital. The Retail licenses you can personally purchace by stockists and retailers does only a few percent of their business volume. And they don't really care about chasing people using their software for free. But a good thing here is, that they share a 30 day trial for use.
Software, that is programmed by only one or a few persons (mostly shareware) and is not paid for, could ruin the programmers, cause they invest time and sweat and get their money by the purchase of every license. No insurance, ammortisation and subsidations. They really should be paid.
Also, this little programs do a good job and are cheap. But no normal person (I'm a student) could afford to buy a license of Rational Rose, Navision, or best example, the Adobe CS3 Design edition. I think as long as you don't use pirated sofware to make money it's okay. Well, when you make your apprenticeship or study, you don't have money for that, of course.
So why don't use Freeware? Most companies (here in Germany) use common software because they can set it off against tax liability and people that are newly employed can use more resources to learn commercial programs. And if they come from other companies, they are used to the software.
When I think about 5 years ago, (when I wasn't full of age) I went to a vocational college for commercial information technology, almost everybody had notebooks or HDD's to copy fresh pirated stuff in the breaks. It was just common.
So to concise: I do, and for me it's okay, as long I don't use it for commercial purpose only for educational one.
Btw. Germany is under the Top10 software pirating countries which I'm not proud about.
Here the statistics: hxxp://www.bsa.org/germany/presse/newsreleases/upload/Piracy%20Study%20FINAL%20REPORT.pdf
Greetz
eNZO
#39
Posted 14 July 2007 - 12:59 AM
I wonder though....Is it considered piracy to continually use trial software? I seem to find some new OS to try and dislike, or am re-arranging partitions enough that if I run out of time on a trial, I just install it on a new partition w/ a new OS.
#40
Posted 26 July 2007 - 04:18 PM
I don't buy that for beta packages. "I'm testing a known buggy product that might change before release so I can decide whether to buy it."I think a few of us are under the category of I'll try it before I buy it.
Now if you did the same once the final was released, OK.
You never know with some of the ridiculous things they throw in those user agreements that none of us read but all accept.Is it considered piracy to continually use trial software?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Sign In
Create Account







