NikeFreak Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 I compiled a new kernel, using the latest sinetek source code. (added AnVSee3 and See42 opemu) Use it to boot system normally. But at compile time has been suggested that "xcrun: error: unable to find utility"ctfmerge", not a developer tool or inPATH"and "xcrun: error: unable to find utility "ctfconvert", not a developertool or in PATH". It affects the compiler？ Thanks！ mach_kernel V7 test.zip tested the core, that's what is written at boot: OPEMU: rep movsq but the system is booted, But that said DarwinDumper: hw.packages: 1 hw.optional.floatingpoint: 1 hw.optional.mmx: 1 hw.optional.sse: 1 hw.optional.sse2: 1 hw.optional.sse3: 1 hw.optional.supplementalsse3: 0 hw.optional.sse4_1: 1 hw.optional.sse4_2: 0 hw.optional.x86_64: 1 hw.optional.aes: 1 hw.optional.avx1_0: 1 hw.optional.rdrand: 0 hw.optional.f16c: 1 hw.optional.enfstrg: 0 hw.optional.fma: 1 hw.optional.avx2_0: 0 hw.optional.bmi1: 0 hw.optional.bmi2: 0 hw.optional.rtm: 0 hw.optional.hle: 0 machdep.pmap.hashwalks: 1028734 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 hi hzhjy123 , you programmer for Xcode ? ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hzhjy123 Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 hi hzhjy123 , you programmer for Xcode ? No. I'm a middle student now,and 14 years. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 (edited) No. I'm a middle student now,and 14 years. :hysterical: Edit: I would just like to briefly point out some times, if someone has problems with its Nvidia graphics card, which should follow these instructions http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/285492-amd-issues-with-nvidia-cards-running-lion-64-bitsmountain-lion-dont-ask-help-here-the-help-topic-is-there-for-you/page-8 my post #159 Edited January 4, 2014 by spakk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duran Keeley Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 I compiled a new kernel, using the latest sinetek source code. (added AnVSee3 and See42 opemu) Use it to boot system normally. But at compile time has been suggested that "xcrun: error: unable to find utility"ctfmerge", not a developer tool or inPATH"and "xcrun: error: unable to find utility "ctfconvert", not a developertool or in PATH". It affects the compiler？ Thanks! Did you download all the dependencies & install them correctly ?? If yes then Try change you default Xcode path (even if you never have before), when I used previous versions of Xcode (Lion & ML) in Mavericks then went to compile a kernel in mavericks this would happen. If you have trouble with knowing what dependencies to download see the attached. xnu-builder-sinetek.zip 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 here the new kernel, I was able to boot easily 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 No. I'm a middle student now,and 14 years. c'est bien ça , la relève est assuré that's right, the succession is assured Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NikeFreak Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 mach_sinetek hw.packages: 1 hw.optional.floatingpoint: 1 hw.optional.mmx: 1 hw.optional.sse: 1 hw.optional.sse2: 1 hw.optional.sse3: 1 hw.optional.supplementalsse3: 0 hw.optional.sse4_1: 1 hw.optional.sse4_2: 0 hw.optional.x86_64: 1 hw.optional.aes: 1 hw.optional.avx1_0: 1 hw.optional.rdrand: 0 hw.optional.f16c: 1 hw.optional.enfstrg: 0 hw.optional.fma: 1 hw.optional.avx2_0: 0 hw.optional.bmi1: 0 hw.optional.bmi2: 0 hw.optional.rtm: 0 hw.optional.hle: 0 mach_kernel v6 hw.packages: 1 hw.optional.floatingpoint: 1 hw.optional.mmx: 1 hw.optional.sse: 1 hw.optional.sse2: 1 hw.optional.sse3: 1 hw.optional.supplementalsse3: 1 hw.optional.sse4_1: 1 hw.optional.sse4_2: 1 hw.optional.x86_64: 1 hw.optional.aes: 1 hw.optional.avx1_0: 1 hw.optional.rdrand: 0 hw.optional.f16c: 1 hw.optional.enfstrg: 0 hw.optional.fma: 1 hw.optional.avx2_0: 0 hw.optional.bmi1: 0 hw.optional.bmi2: 0 hw.optional.rtm: 0 hw.optional.hle: 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 I read somewhat in Intel's specs and it seems that it works somewhat different. The function for string compare is fine but the values always go to xmm0 and I implemented it to go to selected xmm reg. Need to change this. Also this makes me think that one of the arguments contains the count in 2 of the arguments (4 bits + 4 bits? meaning the count+1?) I'm going to do a check on this this evening. Also after fixing this I'm going to implement the 2 missing SSE4.2 instructions. Keep you posted... first a delayed birthday celebration with my girlfriend (Cindy Claes) as I haven't done much on my birthday (3/1/2014) 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tragediana150 Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 (edited) Everything working perfect with mach_sinetek kernel Only reboot is not working but it is no important because I always had a problems with reboot with Mavericks kernels Great work spakk!! EDIT: :sorcerer: HaPpY BiRtHdAy AnDy!!!! :sorcerer: To your girlfriend too Edited January 5, 2014 by tragediana150 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinetek Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 I read somewhat in Intel's specs and it seems that it works somewhat different. The function for string compare is fine but the values always go to xmm0 and I implemented it to go to selected xmm reg. Need to change this. Also this makes me think that one of the arguments contains the count in 2 of the arguments (4 bits + 4 bits? meaning the count+1?) I'm going to do a check on this this evening. Also after fixing this I'm going to implement the 2 missing SSE4.2 instructions. Keep you posted... first a delayed birthday celebration with my girlfriend (Cindy Claes) as I haven't done much on my birthday (3/1/2014) yeah it was right in my implementation i believe, tho the rest was incomplete (i only bothered with one func mode). I think the code calling that instruction is just a strlen(), so only the flags register's result is used. but i agree it would be nice to have the whole 4.2 set. happy age counter increment! cheers to the both of ya 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 yeah it was right in my implementation i believe, tho the rest was incomplete (i only bothered with one func mode). I think the code calling that instruction is just a strlen(), so only the flags register's result is used. but i agree it would be nice to have the whole 4.2 set. happy age counter increment! cheers to the both of ya yes, the functions with strlen style are right (ecx/rcx + flags reg) but the one with xmm0 and the ones with length specified need some adjusting.I'll do that when I get home. ++age; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted January 5, 2014 Author Share Posted January 5, 2014 Happy birthday, Andy! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 Happy birthday, Andy! Sorry, I've totally ignored, even by me a Congratulations subsequently andy for your birthday 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitcore Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 yes , it's kernel 12.5 it worked thanks only had to find some other kexts for my gpu but I did find them (; Happy Birthday Andy! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmos Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 hi guys,my amd works fine in mach-sinetek kernel but reboot not working... but in v6 reboot working Hapy-birthday Andy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duran Keeley Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 :jester: HAPPY BIRTHDAY ANDY!!!! :jester: 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 I'm finally at home. Maybe now I can correct the opemu and add the 2 missing instructions... Keep you posted EDIT: Ok, I ran a little test... movl $4, %eax movl $5, %edx pcmpestri $0, %xmm1, %xmm0 = param a 4 bytes compare, param b 5 bytes compare... Is what it compiles into... 2 params ... one in eax, one in edx Ok, fixed this part... Now change the code to store it in XMM0 and this is all fixed... Ok, added this in the functions which need to store to XMM0: /* Set target to XMM0 */ this->udo_dst->base = UD_R_XMM0; Now try to compile... Ok... had to modify... New code: enum ud_type XMMDST = UD_R_XMM0; /* Set target to XMM0 */ memcpy((void *)&(this->udo_dst->base), (void *)&XMMDST, sizeof(this->udo_dst->base)); I hope this is allowed... New opemu attached... Should work right for all 4 string compare functions... (need to test...) OPEMU.zip 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 the kernel should be in Build folder. if you build with: make ARCH_CONFIGS=X86_64 KERNEL_CONFIGS=RELEASE install it should be under build/dst Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 Last login: Sun Jan 5 23:42:14 on ttys000 localhost:~ spakk$ uname -a Darwin localhost 13.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 13.0.0: So 5 Jan 2014 23:15:58 CET; *patched-sinetek/BUILD/obj/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 localhost:~ spakk$ I make just a few tests with the new kernel, thx AndyNice.Do you use the new opemu with it? the 4 sse4.2 cmp functions should be tested... EDIT: that's not the new opemu I posted above... I fixed that sprintf deprecation to use snprintf.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 not works on CPU FX (chameleon) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 I apologize, I've seen it, old opemu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 really odd... when I compile my kernel: not a single warning... and I have all warn flags set... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted January 6, 2014 Share Posted January 6, 2014 (edited) Excuse me for my clumsy work Last login: Mon Jan 6 02:16:41 on console localhost:~ spakk$ uname -a Darwin localhost 13.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 13.0.0: Mo 6 Jan 2014 02:09:31 CET; *patched-sinetek/BUILD/obj/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 localhost:~ spakk$ BSA_kernel_V8.zip Edited January 6, 2014 by spakk 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booris Posted January 6, 2014 Share Posted January 6, 2014 BSA_kernel_V8 reboot - ok shutdown - ok Phenom X4 945 - SSE4.2 probably not machdep.cpu.brand_string: AMD Phenom II X4 945 Processor machdep.cpu.family: 16 machdep.cpu.model: 4 machdep.cpu.extmodel: 0 machdep.cpu.extfamily: 1 machdep.cpu.stepping: 3 machdep.cpu.feature_bits: 394984447 8396809 machdep.cpu.extfeature_bits: 4022598655 14335 machdep.cpu.signature: 1052483 machdep.cpu.brand: 0 machdep.cpu.features: FPU VME DE PSE TSC MSR PAE MCE CX8 APIC SEP MTRR PGE MCA CMOV PSE36 CLFSH MMX FXSR SSE SSE2 HTT SSE3 MON CX16 POPCNT hw.optional.sse: 1 hw.optional.sse2: 1 hw.optional.sse3: 1 hw.optional.supplementalsse3: 0 hw.optional.sse4_1: 0 hw.optional.sse4_2: 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts