spakk Posted August 30, 2014 Author Share Posted August 30, 2014 there are still major problems with booting with for Phenom II X6 CPUs :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tragediana150 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 there are still major problems with booting with for Phenom II X6 CPUs :( I can do the tests with FX 6-core and 4-core processors if you want some help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 works on CPU FX 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midi-sama Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 I think there will be no chance for my OOOOOOOLD Turion X2 TL-58 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 no works on CPU no SSSE3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerome2013 Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 AMD FX-8320 4.3 Ghz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midi-sama Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 no works on CPU no SSSE3 So it will or not? sorry I didn't get you right *I can speak french* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midi-sama Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 What Gils83 meant was that, in the absence of a specific AMD kernel for Yosemite, you cannot boot 10.10 unless you have a CPU that possess SSSE3 instructions. Basically, same issue as for other OS X versions since Lion and why AMD kernels include a SSSE3 emulator. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSSE3 Thanks, I know that's that old CPU don't have SSSE3, I just didn't understand glis It's already Slow with Mavericks I don't know what would happen if Bronya could make an SSSE3 emult/translator that would be slower I may go to the HELP section to see at least how to run Mavericks properly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midi-sama Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 yeah maybe, since I have 1.8GHz and 667MHz (2GB) RAM, the HDD is good (50MB/s W | R: I don't really know :/ ) the graphics doesn't work yet, USBs are all USB2.0 + an E-Sata. I don't know where that slowness come from but I Guess it's the CPU (so old and 1.8 ) I posted for help here http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/285760-help-topic-further-help-in-chatosx86hulegacykernel-irc/?p=2056963 if anyone can help at least for mavs, will wait if Yos gets SSSE3 Emu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midi-sama Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 Let's say that it's mostly due to lack of graphics acceleration that adds lagging to an already low-end CPU. yeah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted September 1, 2014 Author Share Posted September 1, 2014 Hi all, now I'm stuck here, I boot with Chameleon bootloader (chriss1111) with Yosemite 10.10. Dp1,from System/Library/Extensions/ I have removed these drivers: AppleInelCpuPowerMangement.kext, AppleGraphicsControl.kext, AppleTyMCEDriver.kext, AppleUpstreamUserClient.kext.and testing with and without NullpowerManagement.kext , an new FakeSMC.kext and old fakeSMC.kext (2009) systems not reached in to Desktop the system has no kernel panic, the keyboard works, but it bothers me one thing ... see picture at the top edge ----> can not load kext com.appledriver Applekeystore failed to resolve library dependencies what should I do? Edit: the kernel will boot very clean, except for the described problems .... I'll try Applekeystore from Mavericks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted September 1, 2014 Author Share Posted September 1, 2014 Edit Sorry, no changes. ..that problem with keystore is fixed but the kernel is missing the ssse3emu that to patch is very damn complex and consuming a many time.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrownaround Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 What about those running a CPU with SSSE3? Do we just wait until a kernel with the emulator just so we can attempt it as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 there are still major problems with booting with for Phenom II X6 CPUs :( I think there will be no chance for my OOOOOOOLD Turion X2 TL-58 AIDA64 reports will be welcomed to help bootloader and kernel patching. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted September 6, 2014 Author Share Posted September 6, 2014 AIDA64 reports will be welcomed to help bootloader and kernel patching. Hi Slice, I'm going to upload later my data ....many thanks for your efforts in advance ..... Edit: here my Data files (Aida64 files, Dsdt.dsl and Dsdt.aml, rom file for Radeon HD8240 and SystemInfo ) for AMD E1-2500 APU, the other data from my GA990-FXA-UD3 .. still follow ---> http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/285110-amd-working-builds/page-10?do=findComment&comment=2058854 Edit : here Aida64 report file from my GA990 FXA UD3 AMD E1-2500 APU AIDA64 - and other files.zip Report_GA990-FXA-UD3.rar 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Xtreme Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 Good job guys keep up the good work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 (edited) Now that Yosemite development is nearing completion, Bronya’s unpublished kernel deserves some attention. After at least thirty failed attempts, I finally managed a full vanilla installation on my Athlon Kabini only to realise that the choice of FakeSMC and SMBIOS was crucial. I used Enoch r2390 bootloader which is by far the best for this platform to retain full extensions. There was no hanging during installation which went through as easily as with an Intel CPU. Following initial installation and kernel replacement but before restart, it is imperative to use kext wizard to repair disk permissions. For my part, I install the kernel at the HDD root under the name «mach_kernel », Enoch being able to find it without problem. Bronya’s kernel is really well accomplished, OpenGL / OpenCL works perfectly well as nVidia and ATI graphics cards. Proper CPU speed is the sole remaining issue and significant lag may be experienced depending on CPU demand: only when CPU operates at full speed is video playout fluid (as experienced with Luxmark 2.1 testing). I also noticed a clear difference between the HD 4670 512MB and the GT 440 1024MB in favor of the nVidia card. Although it is less powerful than the HD 4670 (quartz debug mandatory for the ATI), perhaps nVidia graphics drivers are better optimized than ATI’s ? @Bronya, if you’re up for it, can you patch public version #2? I think the results will be much better! I would add that I have a lot less graphics problems with Mavericks, I hope this version of Mac OS X will be much better for us. Thanks Bronya Thanks Hervé for the translation EDIT: More infos Edited September 15, 2014 by fantomas1 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hzhjy123 Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 (edited) Now that Yosemite development is nearing completion, Bronya’s unpublished kernel deserves some attention. After at least thirty failed attempts, I finally managed a full vanilla installation on my Athlon Kabini only to realise that the choice of FakeSMC and SMBIOS was crucial. I used Enoch r2390 bootloader which is by far the best for this platform to retain full extensions. There was no hanging during installation which went through as easily as with an Intel CPU. Following initial installation and kernel replacement but before restart, it is imperative to use kext wizard to repair disk permissions. For my part, I install the kernel at the HDD root under the name «mach_kernel », Enoch being able to find it without problem. Bronya’s kernel is really well accomplished, OpenGL / OpenCL works perfectly well as nVidia and ATI graphics cards. Proper CPU speed is the sole remaining issue and significant lag may be experienced depending on CPU demand: only when CPU operates at full speed is video playout fluid (as experienced with Luxmark 2.1 testing). I also noticed a clear difference between the HD 4670 512MB and the GT 440 1024MB in favor of the nVidia card. Although it is less powerful than the HD 4670 (quartz debug mandatory for the ATI), perhaps nVidia graphics drivers are better optimized than ATI’s ? @Bronya, if you’re up for it, can you patch public version #2? I think the results will be much better! I would add that I have a lot less graphics problems with Mavericks, I hope this version of Mac OS X will be much better for us. Thanks Bronya Thanks Hervé for the translation EDIT: More infos What the kernel you use? You have successfully? Edited September 15, 2014 by fantomas1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted September 15, 2014 Author Share Posted September 15, 2014 This is a patched Yosemite dp1 AMD kernel ... unfortunately at the moment running only with FX CPUs or with SSSE3 compatible CPUs. Once again an outstanding work by Bronya ... this kernel has bronya not yet been released, since that is still a test. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savva_Mitrofanov Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Does the new kernel work with photoshop cs6? on mav pp didn't work? for me it works 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted September 23, 2014 Author Share Posted September 23, 2014 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morpheus NS Posted September 23, 2014 Share Posted September 23, 2014 Is there any way we can get whatever is done up to now, to try testing and reporting results? Maybe the development would go faster with our feedback? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted September 23, 2014 Author Share Posted September 23, 2014 Is there any way we can get whatever is done up to now, to try testing and reporting results? Maybe the development would go faster with our feedback? if you're a good binary-programmer, only then I can see a chance, that the yosemite amd kernel development can go further, but it is not lawful for me, to distribute the kernel! sory Morpheus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Xtreme Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 To bad Hey I'm downloading Yosemite PB3 on OS X Snow Leopard 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted September 26, 2014 Author Share Posted September 26, 2014 Although it is nice that you are downloading yosemite dp3 but it will not work with vanilla Yosemite kernel ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts