Jump to content

How to build your own iMac Pro [Successful Build/Extended Guide]


KGP-iMacPro

iMacPro Build/Guide Feedback   

26 members have voted

  1. 1. Does this guide help you in your endeavour?

    • yes
      21
    • no
      5

This poll is closed to new votes


656 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, blast44 said:

I went and get the Asus Strix RX Radeon Vega 64 GPU but now I am having problems with the SSDT I had to move the wifi and the thunderbolt card one slot down because the GPU is so big that it is covering up slot 3 according to your nomenclature posted in your guide. can you please help me out. I will definitely buy you a beer at the end. thanks.

I have started working on the ssdt.

SSDT-SLEEP.aml

SSDT-TB3-L02-BR1X.aml

SSDT-X299-iMacPro.aml

SSDT-X299-TB3-iMacPro-KGP.aml

Screen Shot 1397-04-07 at 2.39.25 AM.png

 

Can you still use the TB adapter in Slot-4? You can move the Wifi card to any other PCIe slot... 

 

To help you, I would need your original DSDT.aml, a save of your IOREG and a list with the exact device slot population.

 

Edited by KGP-iMacPro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, KGP-iMacPro said:

 

Can you still use the TB adapter in Slot-4? You can move the Wifi card to any other PCIe slot... 

 

To help you, I would need your original DSDT.aml, a save of your IOREG and a list with the exact device slot population.

 

the wifi card only works in slot 3 and 4. i attached my original dsdt but its not allowing me to attach my ioreg.

I got my graphics card to work and show up the wifi works too but the thunderbolt works as well but it does not show up in system profile. the graphics card on the other hand, while it works, the fans are spinning at high speed most times.

DSDT.aml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, blast44 said:

the wifi card only works in slot 3 and 4. i attached my original dsdt but its not allowing me to attach my ioreg.

I got my graphics card to work and show up the wifi works too but the thunderbolt works as well but it does not show up in system profile. the graphics card on the other hand, while it works, the fans are spinning at high speed most times.

DSDT.aml

 

Why does your Wifi card only on work in Slot-3 or 4? I strongly recommend to use the TB-Adopter in Slot-4! 

 

I am not able to do anything without your IOREG. And once more, I need your exact slot population. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KGP-iMacPro said:

 

Why does your Wifi card only on work in Slot-3 or 4? I strongly recommend to use the TB-Adopter in Slot-4! 

 

I am not able to do anything without your IOREG. And once more, I need your exact slot population. 

cant upload ioreg because its more than 10mb. 

why do i see pci-bridge instead ox gfx0 for graphics or nhci for thunder bolt?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys couple of questions;

I’m putting together a new build so I’m between Xeon W-2195 and i9-7980xe.

Does Xeon needs any xcmp patches?

Works like a charm? Sleep? System lag? Android emulator works fast?

The only reason I’m thinking of going with Xeon is because of this:

https://www.asus.com/us/Commercial-Servers-Workstations/WS-C422-SAGE-10G/

Any suggestions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Balamut said:

Hey guys couple of questions;

I’m putting together a new build so I’m between Xeon W-2195 and i9-7980xe.

Does Xeon needs any xcmp patches?

Works like a charm? Sleep? System lag? Android emulator works fast?

The only reason I’m thinking of going with Xeon is because of this:

https://www.asus.com/us/Commercial-Servers-Workstations/WS-C422-SAGE-10G/

Any suggestions?

 

Hi, man! :wink_anim:

 

You know that with a Xeon you won't be able to apply any OC? ECC Ram is costive and slow in addition.. 

 

WS-C422-Sage-10G is a nice thing to have... But...

 

What about https://www.asus.com/Motherboards/WS-X299-SAGE-10G/ ? :drool:  

 

Xeon won't need any XCPM patches, as Skylake-X also does not require any XCPM patches...

 

With Skylake-X/X299 and Vega we have nearly reached vanilla system status .. :P

 

And yes.. in my opinion everything works like a charm, including sleep/wake.. :yes:

 

But this question rather should be answered by others :wink_anim:.. I am not a fan of self promotion... 

 

No clue what is Android emulator..  I am on iPhone X and IOS 11, rather  focusing on hands-off, airdrop and continuity, which perfectly works with my OSXWIFI.. 

 

Edited by KGP-iMacPro
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Balamut said:

Hey guys couple of questions;

I’m putting together a new build so I’m between Xeon W-2195 and i9-7980xe.

Does Xeon needs any xcmp patches?

Works like a charm? Sleep? System lag? Android emulator works fast?

The only reason I’m thinking of going with Xeon is because of this:

https://www.asus.com/us/Commercial-Servers-Workstations/WS-C422-SAGE-10G/

Any suggestions?

 

I'll chip in as well :)

Your choice should be fully about what you use it for.

For example, I run a CAD software that mainly uses a couple of cores per open tab (like an elevation tab, a plan tab, a 3d window etc). Then sometimes I do renders which use all CPU cores flat out. So a CPU that can hit nearly 5gHz works best for my workflow. More cores is a bit pointless and can slow things down with lower clocks. I tried 24 cores last year and it was painfully slow.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, surfinchina said:

 

I'll chip in as well :)

Your choice should be fully about what you use it for.

For example, I run a CAD software that mainly uses a couple of cores per open tab (like an elevation tab, a plan tab, a 3d window etc). Then sometimes I do renders which use all CPU cores flat out. So a CPU that can hit nearly 5gHz works best for my workflow. More cores is a bit pointless and can slow things down with lower clocks. I tried 24 cores last year and it was painfully slow.

 

 

I am happy with my i9-7980XE though and a Geekbench score of >65.000 with 18 cores is not painfully slow.. In any case I guess you won't be able to run a Xeon W-2195 @ something faster than 2.3 Ghz, which might lack any comparison with the 4.7 GHz (sync all cores) of a i9-7980XE. 

 

And I guess that's the key answer to @Balamut 's originating question. 

 

93429936_ScreenShot2018-06-29at21_58_10.png.0e6386f5d88521c19c45efa5c3de35c0.png

 

1594516812_ScreenShot2018-06-29at21_51_58.png.a963486eaa986652ab4b064838556128.png

 

Although Intel specs state 4.3 Ghz turbo frequency for the Xeon W-2195.. Thus  I might be wrong with my assumptions? 

 

1592526714_ScreenShot2018-06-29at22_00_12.thumb.png.7d131e0939f02653d5c01740ee6e2af1.png

Edited by KGP-iMacPro
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, KGP-iMacPro said:

 

Hi, man! :wink_anim:

 

You know that with a Xeon you won't be able to apply any OC? ECC Ram is costive and slow in addition.. 

 

WS-C422-Sage-10G is a nice thing to have... But...

 

What about https://www.asus.com/Motherboards/WS-X299-SAGE-10G/ ? :drool:  

 

 

 

 

No OC on Xeons.

Damn I didn't even see that one, now the choice is between Speed/OC and ECC since the boards are almost identical. Unless the memory correction is paramount and APFS is relying heavily on in memory bit correction like ZFS does, the choice seems obvious.

10G will free up a slot for me for Thunderbolt card.

 

13 hours ago, surfinchina said:

 

I'll chip in as well :)

Your choice should be fully about what you use it for.

For example, I run a CAD software that mainly uses a couple of cores per open tab (like an elevation tab, a plan tab, a 3d window etc). Then sometimes I do renders which use all CPU cores flat out. So a CPU that can hit nearly 5gHz works best for my workflow. More cores is a bit pointless and can slow things down with lower clocks. I tried 24 cores last year and it was painfully slow.

 

 

I've got dual xeon v4 22 cores (Disabled some to get the max 64 core {censored} that Apple placed in the kernel), system is very laggy, and I can't even upgrade pass the 10.13.4

 

On the side note, I'll be getting this CPUs too, would have been fun if they would have worked in MacOS, but hey....

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6818706

 

13 hours ago, KGP-iMacPro said:

 

I am happy with my i9-7980XE though and a Geekbench score of >65.000 with 18 cores is not painfully slow.. In any case I guess you won't be able to run a Xeon W-2195 @ something faster than 2.3 Ghz, which might lack any comparison with the 4.7 GHz (sync all cores) of a i9-7980XE. 

 

And I guess that's the key answer to @Balamut 's originating question. 

 

93429936_ScreenShot2018-06-29at21_58_10.png.0e6386f5d88521c19c45efa5c3de35c0.png

 

1594516812_ScreenShot2018-06-29at21_51_58.png.a963486eaa986652ab4b064838556128.png

 

Although Intel specs state 4.3 Ghz turbo frequency for the Xeon W-2195.. Thus  I might be wrong with my assumptions? 

 

1592526714_ScreenShot2018-06-29at22_00_12.thumb.png.7d131e0939f02653d5c01740ee6e2af1.png

 

I think 4.3Ghz is Max for 1 core only.

Maxed out iMacPro

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7051891

i9-7980xe

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7267634

Thats a huge jump. Although the memory speed is higher here too.

Thank you fellas for all your inputs, it was more then helpful.

Edited by Balamut
Fixing weird spaces.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello.

Thank you for such a detailed manual. I made my setup with ASUS TUF X299 Mark 1.
I have the following problem. After some hours of sleep, I get kernel panic on wake up.
Any ideas?

Spoiler

*** Panic Report ***

Machine-check capabilities: 0x0000000000000c14

family: 6 model: 85 stepping: 4 microcode: 33554499

signature: 0x50654

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7820X CPU @ 3.60GHz

20 error-reporting banks

Processor 14: IA32_MCG_STATUS: 0x0000000000000005

IA32_MC0_STATUS(0x401): 0xb200000000070005

Processor 15: IA32_MCG_STATUS: 0x0000000000000005

IA32_MC0_STATUS(0x401): 0xb200000000070005

mp_kdp_enter(): 49151, 1, 16 TIMED-OUT WAITING FOR NMI-ACK, PROCEEDING

panic(cpu 14 caller 0xffffff8007d886ea): "Machine Check at 0xffffff8007d29b40, registers:\n" "CR0: 0x0000000080010033, CR2: 0x0000000113385000, CR3: 0x00000002d3896121, CR4: 0x0

0000000003627e0\n" "RAX: 0xffffff8053a3ab00, RBX: 0x00000000001cc327, RCX: 0xffffff7f80000001, RDX: 0xffffff80084be540\n" "RSP: 0xffffff9215b93bc8, RBP: 0xffffff9215b93bd0, RSI:

0x03fffffe02212f95, RDI: 0xffffff8020365970\n" "R8:  0x0000000080000000, R9:  0xffffff801f504000, R10: 0xffffff802c9abb98, R11: 0x0000000000e61970\n" "R12: 0x0000000000000006,

R13: 0xffffff8053a3ab00, R14: 0xffffff8039ef3700, R15: 0x000000000000000e\n" "RFL: 0x0000000000000202, RIP: 0xffffff8007d29b40, CS:  0x0000000000000008, SS:  0x0000000000000000\

n" "Error code: 0x0000000000000000\n"@/BuildRoot/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/xnu/xnu-4570.61.1/osfmk/i386/trap_native.c:168

Backtrace (CPU 14), Frame : Return Address

0xffffff8007b53320 : 0xffffff8007c6d166 mach_kernel : _handle_debugger_trap + 0x4c6

0xffffff8007b53370 : 0xffffff8007d95824 mach_kernel : _kdp_i386_trap + 0x114

0xffffff8007b533b0 : 0xffffff8007d87b10 mach_kernel : _kernel_trap + 0x4d0

0xffffff8007b53430 : 0xffffff8007c1f180 mach_kernel : _return_from_trap + 0xe0

0xffffff8007b53450 : 0xffffff8007c6cbdc mach_kernel : _panic_trap_to_debugger + 0x21c

0xffffff8007b53580 : 0xffffff8007c6c99c mach_kernel : _panic + 0x5c

0xffffff8007b535e0 : 0xffffff8007d886ea mach_kernel : _panic_64 + 0xda

0xffffff8007b536d0 : 0xffffff8007c1f9ff mach_kernel : _hndl_machine_check + 0xf

0xffffff9215b93bd0 : 0xffffff8007d2ebe1 mach_kernel : _vm_page_reactivate_local + 0x1d1

0xffffff9215b93c30 : 0xffffff8007cedd04 mach_kernel : _vm_fault_enter + 0x1214

0xffffff9215b93d70 : 0xffffff8007cef1e5 mach_kernel : _vm_pre_fault + 0x1055

0xffffff9215b93f10 : 0xffffff8007d880a2 mach_kernel : _user_trap + 0x192

0xffffff9215b93fa0 : 0xffffff8007c1f092 mach_kernel : _hndl_alltraps + 0xe2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Napka said:

Hello.

Thank you for such a detailed manual. I made my setup with ASUS TUF X299 Mark 1.
I have the following problem. After some hours of sleep, I get kernel panic on wake up.
Any ideas?

  Reveal hidden contents

*** Panic Report ***

Machine-check capabilities: 0x0000000000000c14

family: 6 model: 85 stepping: 4 microcode: 33554499

signature: 0x50654

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7820X CPU @ 3.60GHz

20 error-reporting banks

Processor 14: IA32_MCG_STATUS: 0x0000000000000005

IA32_MC0_STATUS(0x401): 0xb200000000070005

Processor 15: IA32_MCG_STATUS: 0x0000000000000005

IA32_MC0_STATUS(0x401): 0xb200000000070005

mp_kdp_enter(): 49151, 1, 16 TIMED-OUT WAITING FOR NMI-ACK, PROCEEDING

panic(cpu 14 caller 0xffffff8007d886ea): "Machine Check at 0xffffff8007d29b40, registers:\n" "CR0: 0x0000000080010033, CR2: 0x0000000113385000, CR3: 0x00000002d3896121, CR4: 0x0

0000000003627e0\n" "RAX: 0xffffff8053a3ab00, RBX: 0x00000000001cc327, RCX: 0xffffff7f80000001, RDX: 0xffffff80084be540\n" "RSP: 0xffffff9215b93bc8, RBP: 0xffffff9215b93bd0, RSI:

0x03fffffe02212f95, RDI: 0xffffff8020365970\n" "R8:  0x0000000080000000, R9:  0xffffff801f504000, R10: 0xffffff802c9abb98, R11: 0x0000000000e61970\n" "R12: 0x0000000000000006,

R13: 0xffffff8053a3ab00, R14: 0xffffff8039ef3700, R15: 0x000000000000000e\n" "RFL: 0x0000000000000202, RIP: 0xffffff8007d29b40, CS:  0x0000000000000008, SS:  0x0000000000000000\

n" "Error code: 0x0000000000000000\n"@/BuildRoot/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/xnu/xnu-4570.61.1/osfmk/i386/trap_native.c:168

Backtrace (CPU 14), Frame : Return Address

0xffffff8007b53320 : 0xffffff8007c6d166 mach_kernel : _handle_debugger_trap + 0x4c6

0xffffff8007b53370 : 0xffffff8007d95824 mach_kernel : _kdp_i386_trap + 0x114

0xffffff8007b533b0 : 0xffffff8007d87b10 mach_kernel : _kernel_trap + 0x4d0

0xffffff8007b53430 : 0xffffff8007c1f180 mach_kernel : _return_from_trap + 0xe0

0xffffff8007b53450 : 0xffffff8007c6cbdc mach_kernel : _panic_trap_to_debugger + 0x21c

0xffffff8007b53580 : 0xffffff8007c6c99c mach_kernel : _panic + 0x5c

0xffffff8007b535e0 : 0xffffff8007d886ea mach_kernel : _panic_64 + 0xda

0xffffff8007b536d0 : 0xffffff8007c1f9ff mach_kernel : _hndl_machine_check + 0xf

0xffffff9215b93bd0 : 0xffffff8007d2ebe1 mach_kernel : _vm_page_reactivate_local + 0x1d1

0xffffff9215b93c30 : 0xffffff8007cedd04 mach_kernel : _vm_fault_enter + 0x1214

0xffffff9215b93d70 : 0xffffff8007cef1e5 mach_kernel : _vm_pre_fault + 0x1055

0xffffff9215b93f10 : 0xffffff8007d880a2 mach_kernel : _user_trap + 0x192

0xffffff9215b93fa0 : 0xffffff8007c1f092 mach_kernel : _hndl_alltraps + 0xe2

 

 

 

From the prose you provide above not really ... :wink_anim: Try to post facts (EFI-Folder, BIOS settings, IROREG.save, etc. ), status report, system configuration, system composition, etc. 

 

BIOS related questions: Are you using AVX offsets, what is your CPU configuration, MSR lock disabled?

Are you using a properly adopted TSCAdjustReset.kext? 

 

Following some user feedback, the TUF X299 Mark 1 is difficult to handle and also seems not fully suited for its use under OSX. If you have any opportunity, change to a different X299 mobo ... 

 

Edited by KGP-iMacPro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2018 at 6:41 PM, KGP-iMacPro said:

From the prose you provide above not really ... :wink_anim: Try to post facts (EFI-Folder, BIOS settings, IROREG.save, etc. ), status report, system configuration, system composition, etc. 

 

I'm using your config.plist with Nvidia injection enabled, DSDT patches integrated into it, changed serials, etc. One thing I didn't finish yet is I didn't rename offline CPU devices.

My build is in the progress, I didn't get a new CPU/RAM/GPU/M.2 SSD yet, was busy with modding the case and my custom loop.

 

On 6/30/2018 at 6:41 PM, KGP-iMacPro said:

BIOS related questions: Are you using AVX offsets, what is your CPU configuration, MSR lock disabled?

Are you using a properly adopted TSCAdjustReset.kext? 

 

 

I've patched BIOS. As far as I understand, no need to use TSCAdjustReset.kext in this case?

I've double checked all the settings. I didn't OC CPU yet and all offsets are set to Auto.

 

On 6/30/2018 at 6:41 PM, KGP-iMacPro said:

Following some user feedback, the TUF X299 Mark 1 is difficult to handle and also seems not fully suited for its use under OSX. If you have any opportunity, change to a different X299 mobo ... 

 

 

It was painfully slow, but with BIOS patches everything looks almost perfect now except wake problem and some strange CPU Core 11 temperature sensor :D But I didn't edit FakeSMC sensors yet.

Screen Shot 2018-06-30 at 19.17.32.png

Screen Shot 2018-06-30 at 19.42.07.png

Screen Shot 2018-06-30 at 19.42.27.png

 

 

 

Edited by Napka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Napka said:

 

I'm using your config.plist with Nvidia injection enabled, DSDT patches integrated into it, changed serials, etc. One thing I didn't finish yet is I didn't rename offline CPU devices.

My build is in the progress, I didn't get a new CPU/RAM/GPU/M.2 SSD yet, was busy with modding the case and my custom loop.

 

 

I've patched BIOS. As far as I understand, no need to use TSCAdjustReset.kext in this case?

I've double checked all the settings. I didn't OC CPU yet and all offsets are set to Auto.

 

 

It was painfully slow, but with BIOS patches everything looks almost perfect now except wake problem and some strange CPU Core 11 temperature sensor :D But I didn't edit FakeSMC sensors yet.

Screen Shot 2018-06-30 at 19.17.32.png

Screen Shot 2018-06-30 at 19.42.07.png

Screen Shot 2018-06-30 at 19.42.27.png

config.plist

iMac Pro.spx.zip

X3.ioreg.zip

 

With "cpu core ratio" set to "sync all cores", you must set "AVX" to "3" and "AVX-512 to "2"! Otherwise you will witness random kernel panics! 

 

I will check the rest as soon I find time.. BTW.. Or you overlocking your CPU? 

 

I would not patch BIOS firmware version 1401 and rather manually disable MSR LOCK in the BIOS Settings... works flawless.. 

 

It is not recommended to use a mixture of CPs and PRs! Please rename and order all CPs.. All populated PRs first... then all unpopulated PRs... In total you should have 55 PRs..

 

Otherwise, disable all CPxx -> PRxx patches and leave everything as originally implemented by OSX  

Edited by KGP-iMacPro
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, KGP-iMacPro said:

With "cpu core ratio" set to "sync all cores", you must set "AVX" to "3" and "AVX-512 to "2"! Otherwise you will witness random kernel panics! 

 

I will check the rest as soon I find time.. BTW.. Or you overlocking your CPU? 

 

CPU core ratio is set to "Per core", I didn't OC my CPU yet. I have nice temps and CPU is delidded, but I want to make sure everything's perfectly stable first.

I'll check AVX offsets now.

 

18 minutes ago, KGP-iMacPro said:

I would no patch BIOS firmware version 1401 and rather manually disable MSR LOCK in the BIOS Settings... works flawless.. 

 

I've successfully patched 1401, all replaces were successful. I'll try to apply other methods (disable MSR LOCK, TSCAdjustReset.kext, etc.).

 

25 minutes ago, KGP-iMacPro said:

It is not recommended to use a mixture of CPs and PRs! Please rename and order all CPs.. All populated PRs first... then all unpopulated PRs... In total you should have 55 PRs..

Otherwise, disable all CPxx -> PRxx patches and leave everything as implemented by OSX  

3

 

I'll rename remaining cores now. Every check takes time, my system doesn't panic after a brief sleep.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Napka said:

 

CPU core ratio is set to "Per core", I didn't OC my CPU yet. I have nice temps and CPU is delidded, but I want to make sure everything's perfectly stable first.

I'll check AVX offsets now.

 

 

I've successfully patched 1401, all replaces were successful. I'll try to apply other methods (disable MSR LOCK, TSCAdjustReset.kext, etc.).

 

 

I'll rename remaining cores now. Every check takes time, my system doesn't panic after a brief sleep.

 

BTW.. I forgot to mention... The CPU core numbering issues in iStat Menus should be resolved within the next upcoming iStatMenus distribution. Currently, there is still a bug in the program.. The Sensor kexts are working fine though.. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/28/2018 at 1:28 PM, KGP-iMacPro said:

 

Why does your Wifi card only on work in Slot-3 or 4? I strongly recommend to use the TB-Adopter in Slot-4! 

 

I am not able to do anything without your IOREG. And once more, I need your exact slot population. 

 manage to get everything in the right slot, but now I cannot get HDMI Audio to work, how do I enable HDMI Audio with Radeon Vega? Thanks.

Screen Shot 2018-07-02 at 12.40.46 AM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/2/2018 at 1:06 PM, blast44 said:

 manage to get everything in the right slot, but now I cannot get HDMI Audio to work, how do I enable HDMI Audio with Radeon Vega? Thanks.

Screen Shot 2018-07-02 at 12.40.46 AM.png

 

10.13.5 and 10.14: Vega HDAU seems to work exclusively with Whatevergreen.kext v.1.1.7 

Edited by KGP-iMacPro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My ASUS TUF X299 Mark 1 is stable now. Yay!
I have to do more testing for sure.
I have two problems to solve now:
1. Any USB device can wake up a computer, but nothing charges during sleep. External disks are losing connection and "Disk Not Ejected Properly" is shown on wake up. Including Time Machine disk, unfortunately. It looks like USB current during sleep is too low. I'm trying to find a solution, but out of ideas. The problem's wider than I thought at first. Needs more investigation.
2. Not all temperature, rpm, etc. sensors are available for motherboard configuration in Contents/Info.plist. I'm investigating this right now. Commented this later.

Edited by Napka
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, KGP-iMacPro said:

 

What about removing the Nvidia HDAU kext patch from the config.plist? Or maybe you need a slightly different HDAU kext patch for the Vega, what I doubt as natively implemented? Although your entire HDAU implementation seems to fail at present due to unknown reason .. Please check once more your HDAU implementation by means of IOREG! 

nothing shows up in ioreg when I type in "HDAU"

and when I type in "Display" in ioreg  I get: PCO2@0>BR2A@0>SLO5@0>pic-bridge@0>display@0

Shouldn't I see something like GFX@0? thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, blast44 said:

nothing shows up in ioreg when I type in "HDAU"

and when I type in "Display" in ioreg  I get: PCO2@0>BR2A@0>SLO5@0>pic-bridge@0>display@0

Shouldn't I see something like GFX@0? thanks.

 

Your GFX SSDT implementation is not working and that's why also your HDAU SSDT implementation fails.. 

8 hours ago, Napka said:

My ASUS TUF X299 Mark 1 is stable now. Yay!
I have to do more testing for sure.
I have two problems to solve now:
1. Any USB device can wake up a computer, but nothing charges during sleep. External disks are losing connection and "Disk Not Ejected Properly" is shown on wake up. Including Time Machine disk, unfortunately. It looks like USB current during sleep is too low. I'm trying to find a solution, but out of ideas.
2. Not all temperature, rpm, etc. sensors are available for motherboard configuration in Contents/Info.plist. I'm investigating this right now.

 

Wait for the update of iStat Menus.. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KGP-iMacPro said:

 

Your GFX SSDT implementation is not working and that's why also your HDAU SSDT implementation fails.. 

 

Wait for the update of iStat Menus.. 

 

2 hours ago, KGP-iMacPro said:

 

Your GFX SSDT implementation is not working and that's why also your HDAU SSDT implementation fails.. 

 

Wait for the update of iStat Menus.. 

How do i fix this?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, KGP-iMacPro said:

iStatMenus 6.20 Beta

 

Thanks for the link! No CPU cores mess anymore.
But I yet need to jump into sensors source code. Lots of motherboard/external temperature sensors and some fan headers still missing. That was expected, other tools do not display them too.

Edited by Napka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...