Jump to content
15 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I feel that the FireWire implementation here is better than the USB one just because the FireWire upgrade won't need any serious modifications to existing hardware. On top of that, the USB 3.0 standard is slated to use fiber optic cables (taken from Wikipedia). Those things are easy to break, and for most end-users, that's going to be a pain.

I feel that the FireWire implementation here is better than the USB one just because the FireWire upgrade won't need any serious modifications to existing hardware. On top of that, the USB 3.0 standard is slated to use fiber optic cables (taken from Wikipedia). Those things are easy to break, and for most end-users, that's going to be a pain.

 

The new USB is going to be dual-compatible. It is going to be the same shape, and in that one connection allow for fiber or copper. The new USB stuff will use fibers (obviously), while the old copper-based USB stuff will still be able to plug right in and go. That, IMO, is the correct way to implement a standard. As for the breakability, well, people just need to be more careful with their stuff. :P

 

again? when was the last time we waved goodbye to USB? PC's never have and still dont come with firewire ports (with a tiny bit of exceptions).

 

I wouldn't say that. All the laptops in my house, as well as all my 965/975X motherboards have got Firewire. That's not to say it isn't a huge waste of space, but the port is there "just in case." :rolleyes:

 

But thank goodness PC's still come with floppies... :(

 

QFT! LOL!!!

Yes it does.

Well, I guess is based on expierences, I suffer issues with USB disks,specially with large data and never with FW, with other USB devices no issues that I can remember, maybe a few with pendrives, and I had very little experience with other FW devices than Disks, iPods, networking with other computers and cameras.

×
×
  • Create New...