EtherealRemnant Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 Maxxuss - built a new image and started over. I may try burning it to DVD to see if it makes a difference but its doing the same thing. What's the MD5 on the DMG/ISO? I will check to make sure I don't have a bad file to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaS Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 JaS, Nice idea. So before the panic, there is no "Starting Darwin/x86"? In the video I see "Loading Darwin/x86", followed by the loading of the kexts into kernel space, but not the last display message from the boot loader saying "Starting Darwin/x86". (Sorry if this redundant question, but it's hard to handle different issues all at once.) If this last message does not get displayed it might indicate that you're stuck in the boot loader. Yes your correct not starting darwin.Only loading darwin/x86 and then the kexts loading into kernel space.One there done i get the panic.And its not rebundant I totaly understand that you have to ask as many times as you need to to try and get the right info to figure out why it panics on my cpu and not on one that has the DX option. I really appreciate everything your doing to help us get this working.It looks like 10.4.3 will need patches for cpus without sse3 and also without the NX option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EtherealRemnant Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 Figured out how to convert the DMG to ISO using UltraISO... interestingly enough, its not readable by UltraISO OR Transmac. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxxuss Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 I was talking more with working on the individual files. I already did the hex workshop thing.Just patched the mach_kernel on the ISO and it booted with a new kernel dump. One second and I'll post the image. [EDIT] You boot from DVD right?. This "hfs_mountboot failed" sounds bad. Probably a messed up DVD/ISO. From the kernel source: In nfs_mountroot: nfs_mountroot() { ... error = nfs_boot_init(&nd, procp); if (error) { panic("nfs_boot_init failed with %d\n", error); } the error you get is 6, ENXIO "Device not configured". So kernel tries to use hfs (DVD) which fails, and the network nfs, which also fails due to missing configuration. This results in a panic. I think the root cause is messed up DVD. Maxxuss - built a new image and started over. I may try burning it to DVD to see if it makes a difference but its doing the same thing. What's the MD5 on the DMG/ISO? I will check to make sure I don't have a bad file to begin with. md5: 10.4.3_8f1099_for_dtk_userdvd.dmg: daf72f000bd860360ae494d915058af6 10.4.3_8f1099_for_dtk_userdvd.iso (converted via UltraISO; with my boot loader patch applied (3 times)): ce067e8b2ffb418ae529a354f8e78d16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportman Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 we should start making a guide or the wiki or something maybee, one for native and one for vmware i assume native will most likely be working on a gma900 first. also, this would be usefull, because it is a little hard to follow (mostley cause of ppl's stupidity) cause to be honest people shouild be able to figure out how to do native insted of vmware, but hopefully we get to pages on the wiki, to make things easier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swad Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 For legal reasons and just for the simplicity of talking with each other, I would suggest that this discussion take place on IRC! Chatting is much easier than posting on a forum in a situation like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportman Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 Mash, no one is talking about anything in irc , if i mention 10.4.3 they all think the updater is the full version /me sighs, u do have a valid point, should i move this thread so its closed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swad Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 nah, I'd just suggest that everyone interested in working on this join IRC to discuss it. This thread is on the borderline and could become legally troublesome later on. But besides that, IRC just makes it easier to talk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaS Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 EDIT: I dont always feel like getting on irc.I have been using it since 1996....And I like taking a break from it every now and then.Thats just me though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportman Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 agreed, irc does make it easier , Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swad Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 JaS - wouldn't things just be faster on IRC though? It's not that I mind them being discussed here, but it seems like you could make more progress if you were doing it in real time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportman Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 can we make a specific channel for this, or not really, cause i dunno about legality issues? --edit-- yea, we need real time, soo much easier to follow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportman Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 how bout we logg it then post anything important here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swad Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 I would suggest talking in somewhere like #osx86.deep then posting the verified information and ideas here for others to read. It seems like communication would help you guys with speed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EtherealRemnant Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 Alright, I'll take it to IRC as long as its logged - the more people we have working on this, the better. And I do agree on the speed note, I was just worried about information being lost in the shuffle and people forgetting what they did exactly to get where they were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
domino Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 No offence, but I have gone to IRC and all there are are kids the will butt in and ask things aleady common knowledge, absolutely no structure and not everyone can save logs unless they are on it 24/7 to actually log the important and rubbish communications. Sorry to put a damper on the idea about my oppinion about IRC. edit: is there a way to be able to create a place where those who actually know what they are done, join the room. I mean a room not open to the public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swad Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 domino - while that's true, that's why we 1) create a special channel for advanced people like you and 2) kick people out of those channels who aren't helping. But feel free to also post things in this forum. IRC is just in real time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
domino Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 Mashugly: That you. That the what I hoped what would happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportman Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 domino head into #osx86.deep, ill keep u updated on what steps im trying to follow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swad Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 It seems to be the consensus on IRC that it is the TPM and now the new NX requirement that is holding everyone back from installing it. The NX thing is very interesting. It appears that only AMD processors and the latest Intel processors have it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lestat Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 It seems to be the consensus on IRC that it is the TPM and now the new NX requirement that is holding everyone back from installing it. The NX thing is very interesting. It appears that only AMD processors and the latest Intel processors have it. I am sorry, but what is the NX thing??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
domino Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 @sportman, will hollar at you after the game (double header today). You know me and b-ball About NX, yes, thats a damper on just about a majority of users including myself. But I think thats a good target and a great leap when the experts knock down that wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EtherealRemnant Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 Post edited - someone released a PPF patch that appears to do the same thing as my patch did. Removed for DMCA violation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuruu Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 To patch le TPM is to bask in glory! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swad Posted November 6, 2005 Share Posted November 6, 2005 I am sorry, but what is the NX thing??? This article explains it: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/07/08/intel_nx_support/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts