[Betas] macOS High Sierra 10.13.6

[ITzTravelInTime]

 

11 minutes ago, BALDY_MAN said:

 @ ITzTravelinTime ATI 1000 kext. snap shot of plist

 

5 minutes ago, Pavo said:

 

 

thank you very much, it seems like apple has not introduced support to any new vega, but there are that mistrious last 2 ids which we do not know to which card cames from, it does seems like they are vega 12 or vega 20 graphics for new producs, and also 10.13.6 will be supported on the new macs as well i think, but those ids were introduced in macOS 10.13.4 so i think that apple was looking for something to start to install in the new macs wich sould be in production and ready to ship for the wwdc as usual.

 

 

Edited May 30, 2018 by ITzTravelInTime

[surfinchina]

I think there has been some change around permissions. I tried to do the Vega speed up mod to the 10000 kext and it broke it. refused the touch command. I stupidly didn't back up the kext and it didn't like the 10.13.4 kext, so now CCC back to 10.13.4 from my backup drive and update again LOL.

Also I can't mount EFI with the latest CC.

[ITzTravelInTime]

40 minutes ago, surfinchina said:

I think there has been some change around permissions. I tried to do the Vega speed up mod to the 10000 kext and it broke it. refused the touch command. I stupidly didn't back up the kext and it didn't like the 10.13.4 kext, so now CCC back to 10.13.4 from my backup drive and update again LOL.

Also I can't mount EFI with the latest CC.

 

Yes, that makes a lot of sense and explains why the efi partition mount script do not works without sudo, now we have to find a new way to mount it wich works with sudo, and also find a way to make the touch to work again.

 

I have also to try this new version using my app tinu, because it does uses sudo for some of the most important tasks it has to perform

[mnfesq]

1 hour ago, ITzTravelInTime said:

 

Yes, that makes a lot of sense and explains why the efi partition mount script do not works without sudo, now we have to find a new way to mount it wich works with sudo, and also find a way to make the touch to work again.

 

I have also to try this new version using my app tinu, because it does uses sudo for some of the most important tasks it has to perform

 

Maybe related to SIP and can be disabled in Clover?

[Pavo]

10 minutes ago, mnfesq said:

 

Maybe related to SIP and can be disabled in Clover?

Not SIP related because I have SIP disabled

[zxv]

3 hours ago, ITzTravelInTime said:

 

Yes, that makes a lot of sense and explains why the efi partition mount script do not works without sudo, now we have to find a new way to mount it wich works with sudo, and also find a way to make the touch to work again.

 

I have also to try this new version using my app tinu, because it does uses sudo for some of the most important tasks it has to perform

Prepend 'sudo' to whatever terminal command one usually runs to mount EFI partition—e.g. "sudo diskutil mount disk*s1" appears to work fine.

[FredWst]

Hi,

 

New USB patch 

com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBXHCI

Find <837d880f 0f83a704>

Replace <837d88xx 0f83a704>

 

In my case xx = 1a 

 

Fred

Edited May 31, 2018 by FredWst

[PippoX0]

All fine here.

BTW. I'm waiting for macOS 10.13.7 final release ...

:-)


sent from my iPhone

[Kynyo]

Looks like we need a new IOUSBFamily patch.

@PMHeart please help us

 

Got the patch from this thread.

Thanks @FredWst

Edited May 31, 2018 by Kynyo

[Kynyo]

3 hours ago, FredWst said:

Hi,

 

New USB patch 

com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBXHCI

Find <837d880f 0f83a704>

Replace <837d88xx 0f83a704>

 

In my case xx = 1a 

 

Fred

How can we adapt new patch like the old one?

 

<key>KextsToPatch</key>
        <array>
            <dict>
                <key>Comment</key>
                <string>USB 10.13.4+ by PMHeart</string>
                <key>Disabled</key>
                <false/>
                <key>Find</key>
                <data>
                g32UDw+DlwQAAA==
                </data>
                <key>InfoPlistPatch</key>
                <false/>
                <key>MatchOS</key>
                <string>10.13.x</string>
                <key>Name</key>
                <string>com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBXHCI</string>
                <key>Replace</key>
                <data>
                g32UD5CQkJCQkA==
                </data>
            </dict>
        </array>

Thanks.

 

EDIT:

 

Nevermind! Solved like this with CC:

 

 

<key>KextsToPatch</key>
        <array>
            <dict>
                <key>Comment</key>
                <string>USB 10.13.6+ by FredWst</string>
                <key>Disabled</key>
                <false/>
                <key>Find</key>
                <data>
                g32IDw+DpwQ=
                </data>
                <key>InfoPlistPatch</key>
                <false/>
                <key>MatchOS</key>
                <string>10.13.x</string>
                <key>Name</key>
                <string>com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBXHCI</string>
                <key>Replace</key>
                <data>
                g32IGg+DpwQ=
                </data>
            </dict>
        </array>

 

Edited May 31, 2018 by Kynyo
Solved!

[SavageAUS]

38 minutes ago, Kynyo said:

<key>KextsToPatch</key> <array> <dict> <key>Comment</key> <string>USB 10.13.6+ by FredWst</string> <key>Disabled</key> <false/> <key>Find</key> <data> g32IDw+DpwQ= </data> <key>InfoPlistPatch</key> <false/> <key>MatchOS</key> <string>10.13.x</string> <key>Name</key> <string>com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBXHCI</string> <key>Replace</key> <data> g32IGg+DpwQ= </data> </dict> </array>

How many ports does this patch allow?

Update went well here.

[Kynyo]

Ask FredWst.

15 to 26 I guess.

Using latest Usbinjectall 0.65.

 

[chris1111]

No issue HP ProBook 6570b

[PMheart]

7 hours ago, FredWst said:

Hi,

 

New USB patch 

 com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBXHCI

Find <837d880f 0f83a704>

Replace <837d88xx 0f83a704>

 

In my case xx = 1a 

 

Fred

Hi Fred,

 

I think we can NOP the conditional jump again. So the patch will be:

837d880f0f83a7040000 -> 837d880f909090909090

 

[Kynyo]

Tested, all good PMHeart. Thanks. Guess that in this form we can apply to all configurations.

 

 

[Guest]

new Performances fix from @PMHeart beta 1 10.13.6 (kernel to Patch)

find
C1 E3 08 48 63 D3 89 D0 48 C1 EA 20 B9 99 01 00 00 0F 30 48 FF 05 B9 BD 6B 00 48 83 C4 08 5B 5D C3 66 2E 0F 1F 84 00 00 00 00 00

repl
BB 00 FF 00 00 48 63 D3 89 D0 48 C1 EA 20 B9 99 01 00 00 0F 30 48 FF 05 B9 BD 6B 00 48 83 C4 08 5B 5D C3 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90

Edited June 1, 2018 by Guest

[ITzTravelInTime]

Just now, fabiosun said:

new Performances fix By PMHeart beta 1 10.13.6 (kernel to Patch)

find
C1 E3 08 48 63 D3 89 D0 48 C1 EA 20 B9 99 01 00 00 0F 30 48 FF 05 B9 BD 6B 00 48 83 C4 08 5B 5D C3 66 2E 0F 1F 84 00 00 00 00 00

repl
BB 00 FF 00 00 48 63 D3 89 D0 48 C1 EA 20 B9 99 01 00 00 0F 30 48 FF 05 B9 BD 6B 00 48 83 C4 08 5B 5D C3 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90

 

never heard about this patch, can you tell me more about the performance patch?

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, ITzTravelInTime said:

 

never heard about this patch, can you tell me more about the performance patch?

Maybe you knew it as Oarksit patch

In few words if you have EIST enabled in your bios it help to boost performances when all cores are used in system with unsupported CPU like some X99 cpu(Xeon)

[ITzTravelInTime]

2 minutes ago, fabiosun said:

Maybe you knew it as Oarksit patch

In few words if you have EIST enabled in your bios it help to boost performances when all cores are used in system with unsupported CPU like some X99 cpu(Xeon)

 

Thank you, so this is basically a patch to improve performance with speedstep rigth? very cool i have friends who builds multicore x99 xeon and i7 based work stations (and also some of those weere dual socket 2011-v3 workstations) which are all hackintoshes, so always interesting to know

[Guest]

8 minutes ago, ITzTravelInTime said:

 

Thank you, so this is basically a patch to improve performance with speedstep rigth? very cool i have friends who builds multicore x99 xeon and i7 based work stations (and also some of those weere dual socket 2011-v3 workstations) which are all hackintoshes, so always interesting to know

yes

if you want take a look here

for a short period I have had a dual intel xeon 2696V4 rig

 

[MattsCreative]

20 minutes ago, fabiosun said:

Maybe you knew it as Oarksit patch

In few words if you have EIST enabled in your bios it help to boost performances when all cores are used in system with unsupported CPU like some X99 cpu(Xeon)

so the patch wont help z97?

[Guest]

6 minutes ago, WarDoc said:

so the patch wont help z97?

never tested with other system different from X99

but a simple test is

try with EIST enabled in bios a simple cpu benchmark as cinebenchZ ands see if all your cores are stable @Higher frequency possible for your cpu

If not use this patch and try again

 

[ITzTravelInTime]

usually on 115X platforms it's not needed because everything works natively regarding power management, with the exception of some cpus like lower end stuff or particular stuff like xeons on that platforms

 

[MattsCreative]

4 minutes ago, fabiosun said:

never tested with other system different from X99

but a simple test is

try with EIST enabled in bios a simple cpu benchmark as cinebenchZ ands see if all your cores are stable @Higher frequency possible for your cpu

If not use this patch and try again

 

my 4790k is some what busted so i can't overclock or use turbo so 4.0ghz is all i can do 

[ITzTravelInTime]

Hi guys, can you paste the command to let the system to see the update? I am trying to upgrade from 10.13.5 beta to 10.13.6 beta, but without success, it does not show the update, I just need it for my macbook to test some programs because of how the requirement of sudo changes