Jump to content

10.4.8 without HPET/NX and SSE2

semthex

By semthex,
in OSx86 10.4 (Tiger)

 Share
281 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest goodtime
Guest goodtime
Posted
Posted
i have a 10.4.8 kernel version running right now,

 

And having some ISSUES, everything works perfectly, The Vide drivers are WOW!!

 

DVI output everything is recognized

 

look:

 

Radeon X1600 Series:

 

Chipset Model: Radeon X1600 Series

Type: Display

Bus: PCIe

VRAM (Total): 256 MB

Vendor: ATI (0x1002)

Device ID: 0x71c0

Revision ID: 0x0000

Displays:

SyncMaster:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050 @ 60 Hz

Depth: 32-bit Color

Core Image: Supported

Main Display: Yes

Mirror: Off

Online: Yes

Quartz Extreme: Supported

Rotation: Supported

 

i will see if it got two screens support as soon as i can it really looks awesome.

 

The neopheus installer for Video and Lan worked wonderfully

BUT

 

i have the works Xbench results since i got a conroe

 

look:

Previous xbench

 

Results 159.83

System Info

Xbench Version 1.3

System Version 10.4.7 (8J2135a)

Physical RAM 2048 MB

Model ADP2,1

Drive Type WDC WD3200KS-00PFB0

CPU Test 127.73

GCD Loop 308.36 16.25 Mops/sec

Floating Point Basic 149.10 3.54 Gflop/sec

vecLib FFT 90.02 2.97 Gflop/sec

Floating Point Library 97.48 16.97 Mops/sec

Thread Test 259.77

Computation 238.50 4.83 Mops/sec, 4 threads

Lock Contention 285.20 12.27 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads

Memory Test 159.90

System 151.53

Allocate 116.37 427.34 Kalloc/sec

Fill 194.01 9433.21 MB/sec

Copy 165.29 3414.07 MB/sec

Stream 169.25

Copy 158.30 3269.70 MB/sec

Scale 161.23 3330.88 MB/sec

Add 180.49 3844.90 MB/sec

Triad 179.40 3837.86 MB/sec

Quartz Graphics Test 191.04

Line 157.22 10.47 Klines/sec [50% alpha]

Rectangle 200.55 59.88 Krects/sec [50% alpha]

Circle 192.45 15.69 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]

Bezier 173.60 4.38 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]

Text 258.44 16.17 Kchars/sec

OpenGL Graphics Test 205.63

Spinning Squares 205.63 260.85 frames/sec

User Interface Test 479.96

Elements 479.96 2.20 Krefresh/sec

Disk Test 73.09

Sequential 109.83

Uncached Write 124.17 76.24 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Write 111.04 62.82 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Uncached Read 87.74 25.68 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Read 125.57 63.11 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Random 54.77

Uncached Write 20.70 2.19 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Write 173.11 55.42 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Uncached Read 90.18 0.64 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Read 127.45 23.65 MB/sec [256K blocks]

With new kenrel

 

Results 86.31

System Info

Xbench Version 1.3

System Version 10.4.8 (8L2127)

Physical RAM 2048 MB

Model ACPI

Drive Type SAMSUNG SP2004C

CPU Test 82.64

GCD Loop 188.85 9.95 Mops/sec

Floating Point Basic 90.55 2.15 Gflop/sec

vecLib FFT 65.63 2.17 Gflop/sec

Floating Point Library 59.44 10.35 Mops/sec

Thread Test 160.54

Computation 146.94 2.98 Mops/sec, 4 threads

Lock Contention 176.92 7.61 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads

Memory Test 105.06

System 105.35

Allocate 88.97 326.73 Kalloc/sec

Fill 119.86 5827.93 MB/sec

Copy 112.42 2321.97 MB/sec

Stream 104.78

Copy 98.39 2032.12 MB/sec

Scale 101.21 2090.98 MB/sec

Add 110.75 2359.19 MB/sec

Triad 109.89 2350.74 MB/sec

Quartz Graphics Test 117.01

Line 96.91 6.45 Klines/sec [50% alpha]

Rectangle 118.47 35.37 Krects/sec [50% alpha]

Circle 113.03 9.21 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]

Bezier 106.15 2.68 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]

Text 175.31 10.97 Kchars/sec

OpenGL Graphics Test 130.47

Spinning Squares 130.47 165.51 frames/sec

User Interface Test 285.03

Elements 285.03 1.31 Krefresh/sec

Disk Test 29.82

Sequential 60.79

Uncached Write 78.01 47.90 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Write 68.08 38.52 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Uncached Read 42.41 12.41 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Read 67.95 34.15 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Random 19.75

Uncached Write 6.60 0.70 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Write 54.32 17.39 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Uncached Read 51.11 0.36 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Read 76.29 14.16 MB/sec [256K blocks]

As you can see WORST results in every section....

 

How do i installed it:

Jas 10.4.6 + Mac official 10.4.8 update + Vitaly kernel

 

This is my boot psllist not sure if its ok...

 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple Computer//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">

<plist version="1.0">

<dict>

<key>Kernel</key>

<string>mach_kernel</string>

<key>Kernel Flags</key>

<string></string>

<string>fsb=326 -v</string>

<key>Boot Graphics</key>

<string>Yes</string>

</dict>

</plist>

 

Anyway everything "looks" perfect

 

but i think the clock is a liittle fast

 

gona test it now against real watch clock

 

anybody got an idea?

 

DVI out of the box sounds promising! Great work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aberracus
aberracus
Posted
Posted

The Results arent bad labelled but my boot plist was wrong

 

now is ok

 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple Computer//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">

<plist version="1.0">

<dict>

<key>Kernel</key>

<string>mach_kernel</string>

<key>Kernel Flags</key>

<string></string> <<<<<<<<<< This line should be removed!!!!

<string>fsb=326 -v</string>

<key>Boot Graphics</key>

<string>Yes</string>

</dict>

</plist>

 

now my xbench is better but my disk are slower maybe thats happening cause this disk is SATA I and teh other is SATA II ?

 

new xbench after correction boot.plist

 

Results 136.68

System Info

Xbench Version 1.3

System Version 10.4.8 (8L2127)

Physical RAM 2048 MB

Model ACPI

Drive Type SAMSUNG SP2004C

CPU Test 135.56

GCD Loop 307.42 16.20 Mops/sec

Floating Point Basic 148.07 3.52 Gflop/sec

vecLib FFT 108.90 3.59 Gflop/sec

Floating Point Library 96.91 16.88 Mops/sec

Thread Test 261.89

Computation 239.81 4.86 Mops/sec, 4 threads

Lock Contention 288.44 12.41 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads

Memory Test 174.87

System 180.15

Allocate 150.73 553.53 Kalloc/sec

Fill 194.66 9465.02 MB/sec

Copy 204.87 4231.59 MB/sec

Stream 169.89

Copy 158.38 3271.29 MB/sec

Scale 162.91 3365.62 MB/sec

Add 180.84 3852.33 MB/sec

Triad 179.79 3846.15 MB/sec

Quartz Graphics Test 197.40

Line 159.34 10.61 Klines/sec [50% alpha]

Rectangle 204.51 61.06 Krects/sec [50% alpha]

Circle 196.61 16.03 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]

Bezier 178.49 4.50 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]

Text 287.77 18.00 Kchars/sec

OpenGL Graphics Test 214.99

Spinning Squares 214.99 272.72 frames/sec

User Interface Test 450.52

Elements 450.52 2.07 Krefresh/sec

Disk Test 44.72

Sequential 73.39

Uncached Write 44.08 27.06 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Write 113.07 63.97 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Uncached Read 70.16 20.53 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Read 114.72 57.66 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Random 32.15

Uncached Write 10.64 1.13 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Write 97.38 31.18 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Uncached Read 80.75 0.57 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Read 128.92 23.92 MB/sec [256K blocks]

 

is SATa I te culprit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
semthex
semthex
Posted
  • Author
Posted
This can be a problem to 'develop' a kernel for the new Cat?

 

 

I don't udnerstand your question, can you please explain? If you mean the removed sources? It was discovered yesterday by my cool IRC ppl and I posted it on my blog. Lol, it was amazing since the story got digged today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dualBooter
dualBooter
Posted
Posted

Hi all,

 

Now that some people are getting 10.4.8 into their rigs and some people are getting xbench scores -

I'm curious what the highest is so far (while we're all waiting for our 'seeds' to grow). I just read a Slashdot article (http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?si...37&from=rss) about a guy that just got a new MB Pro with a 2.33GHz C2D, and on his site (http://lartren.com.nyud.net:8080/mac/) - he posts his XBENCH Results of 142.72 :compress:

(BTW, this site takes a bit of time to load, due to the /. effect)

 

Anyone get higher yet?

 

Cheers to all who have labored and contributed to a more informed society!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
semthex
semthex
Posted
  • Author
Posted

@rajkosto: NForce is hpet less as fas as I know. The NX bit is off by default in the sources but atm it'S abad idea to try use AMD since of serveral buggy parts with AMD.

 

@nixblicker: Yeah we are already working on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aberracus
aberracus
Posted
Posted

ok i have put the new kernel and offical 10.4.8 (reverse order) in my usual HD thius are the xbench results

 

Results 159.59

System Info

Xbench Version 1.3

System Version 10.4.8 (8L2127)

Physical RAM 2048 MB

Model ACPI

Drive Type WDC WD3200KS-00PFB0

CPU Test 135.70

GCD Loop 308.16 16.24 Mops/sec

Floating Point Basic 147.90 3.51 Gflop/sec

vecLib FFT 109.25 3.60 Gflop/sec

Floating Point Library 96.93 16.88 Mops/sec

Thread Test 251.74

Computation 226.87 4.60 Mops/sec, 4 threads

Lock Contention 282.75 12.16 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads

Memory Test 165.44

System 160.88

Allocate 133.15 488.99 Kalloc/sec

Fill 193.63 9414.49 MB/sec

Copy 167.43 3458.19 MB/sec

Stream 170.27

Copy 158.97 3283.45 MB/sec

Scale 159.25 3290.13 MB/sec

Add 183.43 3907.51 MB/sec

Triad 182.79 3910.39 MB/sec

Quartz Graphics Test 194.97

Line 157.76 10.50 Klines/sec [50% alpha]

Rectangle 202.58 60.48 Krects/sec [50% alpha]

Circle 194.28 15.84 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]

Bezier 175.52 4.43 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]

Text 283.70 17.75 Kchars/sec

OpenGL Graphics Test 213.58

Spinning Squares 213.58 270.94 frames/sec

User Interface Test 406.01

Elements 406.01 1.86 Krefresh/sec

Disk Test 70.40

Sequential 97.70

Uncached Write 119.44 73.34 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Write 86.74 49.08 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Uncached Read 77.56 22.70 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Read 122.75 61.69 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Random 55.03

Uncached Write 20.90 2.21 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Write 178.32 57.09 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Uncached Read 89.88 0.64 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Read 123.25 22.87 MB/sec [256K blocks]

 

so im happy...

 

and pro apps are running!

 

display looks proomising, DVI is working perfectly

Radeon X1600 Series:

 

Chipset Model: Radeon X1600 Series

Type: Display

Bus: PCIe

VRAM (Total): 256 MB

Vendor: ATI (0x1002)

Device ID: 0x71c0

Revision ID: 0x0000

Displays:

SyncMaster:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050 @ 60 Hz

Depth: 32-bit Color

Core Image: Supported

Main Display: Yes

Mirror: Off

Online: Yes

Quartz Extreme: Supported

Rotation: Supported

 

Thanks ALL !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ai Haibara
Ai Haibara
Posted
Posted
@rajkosto: NForce is hpet less as fas as I know. The NX bit is off by default in the sources but atm it'S abad idea to try use AMD since of serveral buggy parts with AMD.

Semthex, you are the genius, so please listen us AMD users and work on an AMD-patched 10.4.8 kernel.

Nothing is impossible, remember :gun:

Sherry Haibara

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SaxMachine
SaxMachine
Posted
Posted
Semthex, you are the genius, so please listen us AMD users and work on an AMD-patched 10.4.8 kernel.

Nothing is impossible, remember :gun:

Sherry Haibara

 

Yeahh would be perfect...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
erikk
erikk
Posted
Posted

DVI works with VGA Adapter or directly with DVI Monitor?

Did you try dual screen?

 

ok i have put the new kernel and offical 10.4.8 (reverse order) in my usual HD thius are the xbench results

 

Results 159.59

System Info

Xbench Version 1.3

System Version 10.4.8 (8L2127)

Physical RAM 2048 MB

Model ACPI

Drive Type WDC WD3200KS-00PFB0

CPU Test 135.70

GCD Loop 308.16 16.24 Mops/sec

Floating Point Basic 147.90 3.51 Gflop/sec

vecLib FFT 109.25 3.60 Gflop/sec

Floating Point Library 96.93 16.88 Mops/sec

Thread Test 251.74

Computation 226.87 4.60 Mops/sec, 4 threads

Lock Contention 282.75 12.16 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads

Memory Test 165.44

System 160.88

Allocate 133.15 488.99 Kalloc/sec

Fill 193.63 9414.49 MB/sec

Copy 167.43 3458.19 MB/sec

Stream 170.27

Copy 158.97 3283.45 MB/sec

Scale 159.25 3290.13 MB/sec

Add 183.43 3907.51 MB/sec

Triad 182.79 3910.39 MB/sec

Quartz Graphics Test 194.97

Line 157.76 10.50 Klines/sec [50% alpha]

Rectangle 202.58 60.48 Krects/sec [50% alpha]

Circle 194.28 15.84 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]

Bezier 175.52 4.43 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]

Text 283.70 17.75 Kchars/sec

OpenGL Graphics Test 213.58

Spinning Squares 213.58 270.94 frames/sec

User Interface Test 406.01

Elements 406.01 1.86 Krefresh/sec

Disk Test 70.40

Sequential 97.70

Uncached Write 119.44 73.34 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Write 86.74 49.08 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Uncached Read 77.56 22.70 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Read 122.75 61.69 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Random 55.03

Uncached Write 20.90 2.21 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Write 178.32 57.09 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Uncached Read 89.88 0.64 MB/sec [4K blocks]

Uncached Read 123.25 22.87 MB/sec [256K blocks]

 

so im happy...

 

and pro apps are running!

 

display looks proomising, DVI is working perfectly

Radeon X1600 Series:

 

Chipset Model: Radeon X1600 Series

Type: Display

Bus: PCIe

VRAM (Total): 256 MB

Vendor: ATI (0x1002)

Device ID: 0x71c0

Revision ID: 0x0000

Displays:

SyncMaster:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050 @ 60 Hz

Depth: 32-bit Color

Core Image: Supported

Main Display: Yes

Mirror: Off

Online: Yes

Quartz Extreme: Supported

Rotation: Supported

 

Thanks ALL !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest bikedude880
Guest bikedude880
Posted
Posted
Hi all,

 

Now that some people are getting 10.4.8 into their rigs and some people are getting xbench scores -

I'm curious what the highest is so far (while we're all waiting for our 'seeds' to grow).

 

Anyone get higher yet?

 

Does this help? Pentium D 806 (2.66Ghz OC to 3.09) on ASUS P5LD2-VM mobo w/1GB Ram.

 

Results	153.59	
System Info		
	Xbench Version		1.3
	System Version		10.4.8 (8L2127)
	Physical RAM		1024 MB
	Model		ACPI
	Drive Type		Maxtor 6V200E0
CPU Test	92.62	
	GCD Loop	121.97	6.43 Mops/sec
	Floating Point Basic	105.75	2.51 Gflop/sec
	vecLib FFT	69.48	2.29 Gflop/sec
	Floating Point Library	89.76	15.63 Mops/sec
Thread Test	223.16	
	Computation	200.68	4.07 Mops/sec, 4 threads
	Lock Contention	251.31	10.81 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
Memory Test	134.48	
	System	113.15	
		Allocate	93.29	342.58 Kalloc/sec
		Fill	142.72	6939.44 MB/sec
		Copy	113.80	2350.46 MB/sec
	Stream	165.72	
		Copy	159.08	3285.78 MB/sec
		Scale	160.46	3315.08 MB/sec
		Add	172.57	3676.19 MB/sec
		Triad	171.68	3672.57 MB/sec
Quartz Graphics Test	156.96	
	Line	145.41	9.68 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
	Rectangle	156.59	46.75 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
	Circle	154.28	12.58 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
	Bezier	144.27	3.64 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
	Text	193.12	12.08 Kchars/sec
OpenGL Graphics Test	268.88	
	Spinning Squares	268.88	341.09 frames/sec
User Interface Test	265.48	
	Elements	265.48	1.22 Krefresh/sec
Disk Test	111.07	
	Sequential	162.95	
		Uncached Write	174.66	107.24 MB/sec [4K blocks]
		Uncached Write	159.66	90.34 MB/sec [256K blocks]
		Uncached Read	150.51	44.05 MB/sec [4K blocks]
		Uncached Read	169.07	84.97 MB/sec [256K blocks]
	Random	84.24	
		Uncached Write	39.23	4.15 MB/sec [4K blocks]
		Uncached Write	149.13	47.74 MB/sec [256K blocks]
		Uncached Read	110.67	0.78 MB/sec [4K blocks]
		Uncached Read	160.01	29.69 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Careless
Careless
Posted
Posted

so are people running nVidia drivers now, or something?

 

why are xbench scores going way up? is this just a performance enhancement that we're seeing from 10.4.4 kernel to 10.4.8 like any ordinary system update on a real mac?

 

and can someone explain this "pro" apps thing? is this a feature that is only enabled when using 10.4.7 kernel and higher or something? what designates an application as "pro"

 

 

 

annnnnnnnnnd.... AMD love, please :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rammjet
Rammjet
Posted
Posted
what designates an application as "pro"

From Apple website:

 

Pro Applications

 

Final Cut Studio. - Tools for real-time video and audio production.

- Final Cut Pro 5. - Native HDV. Now editing in real time.

- Soundtrack Pro. - Sound is half the picture.

- Motion 2. - Advanced animation. Instant gratification.

- DVD Studio Pro 4. - Encode. Author. Burn. Deliver.

- Compressor 2. - Making digital duplication and content delivery a breeze.

Aperture. - Designed for professional photographers.

Logic Pro. - Comprehensive music toolkit.

Shake. - Advanced digital compositing. Already in a theater near you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest bikedude880
Guest bikedude880
Posted
Posted
bikedude and abberacuss: what kernel is that? is it sse2 or sse3? mifki or semthex?

 

That is SSE3 semthex kernel. Mifki's got a 141.41 (no joke) on the same exact setup.

 

Mifki's kernel: 

Results	141.41	
System Info		
	Xbench Version		1.3
	System Version		10.4.8 (8L2127)
	Physical RAM		1024 MB
	Model		ACPI
	Drive Type		Maxtor 6V200E0
CPU Test	92.37	
	GCD Loop	121.99	6.43 Mops/sec
	Floating Point Basic	104.54	2.48 Gflop/sec
	vecLib FFT	69.31	2.29 Gflop/sec
	Floating Point Library	89.99	15.67 Mops/sec
Thread Test	222.16	
	Computation	198.59	4.02 Mops/sec, 4 threads
	Lock Contention	252.07	10.84 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
Memory Test	90.74	
	System	62.47	
		Allocate	31.13	114.31 Kalloc/sec
		Fill	142.00	6904.16 MB/sec
		Copy	112.87	2331.38 MB/sec
	Stream	165.80	
		Copy	158.79	3279.68 MB/sec
		Scale	159.55	3296.28 MB/sec
		Add	173.82	3702.83 MB/sec
		Triad	172.19	3683.52 MB/sec
Quartz Graphics Test	149.39	
	Line	138.49	9.22 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
	Rectangle	151.60	45.26 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
	Circle	149.07	12.15 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
	Bezier	136.01	3.43 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
	Text	178.83	11.19 Kchars/sec
OpenGL Graphics Test	268.59	
	Spinning Squares	268.59	340.73 frames/sec
User Interface Test	292.91	
	Elements	292.91	1.34 Krefresh/sec
Disk Test	107.24	
	Sequential	153.41	
		Uncached Write	162.60	99.83 MB/sec [4K blocks]
		Uncached Write	162.82	92.12 MB/sec [256K blocks]
		Uncached Read	123.90	36.26 MB/sec [4K blocks]
		Uncached Read	175.10	88.01 MB/sec [256K blocks]
	Random	82.43	
		Uncached Write	37.23	3.94 MB/sec [4K blocks]
		Uncached Write	147.56	47.24 MB/sec [256K blocks]
		Uncached Read	113.22	0.80 MB/sec [4K blocks]
		Uncached Read	165.12	30.64 MB/sec [256K blocks]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
calmesal
calmesal
Posted
Posted

Can some one please explain for me why the system doesnt boot withe HT enabled in BIOS with SEMTHEX 10,4,8 kernel?

 

Can some one please explain for me why the system doesnt boot withe HT enabled in BIOS with SEMTHEX 10,4,8 kernel?

 

Can some one please explain for me why the system doesnt boot withe HT enabled in BIOS with SEMTHEX 10,4,8 kernel?

It boots fine without HT exept CI/QE. I have GMA900 reselution change works, Prescott P4 3.2Ghz SSE3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaemonES
DaemonES
Posted
Posted
@rajkosto: NForce is hpet less as fas as I know.
No nF4 has HPET, like many South Bridges dated by 2004 and later, but on some boards it doesn't want to work properly.

 

bikedude880 You have different results, cause semthex use RTC timer, and mifki - HPET.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aberracus
aberracus
Posted
Posted

No this isnt an sse2 kernel thread there arent right now WORKING sse2 kernels (10.4.8),

 

@bikedude880 Ok about my system its running over Vitaly/Mifki kernel

 

I can see the diferences between your xbench and mine, your HD speed are awesome can you describe your HD setting?

 

 

cause an any other area my scors are better (as they should be, im using conroe..)

 

that good testing changing semthex and vitalyty kernels to test speed diferences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...