Nico3d3 Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 I'm an idiot. I installed this update thinking it wouldn't do anything wrong. It broke sleep support on my hackingtosh. I was really happy to have sleep with my new 8600GT but now, it's back to where I was before. Changing back to the old 9.2.0 mach_kernel didn't help at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
^_^ Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 hmm, works but feel a bit slow in my setup... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exman Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 This update broke my Kalyway 10.5.2 + sleep kernel. Kernel panic, black screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stravaganza Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 Thanks for the warning, erei33. I second Paranoid Marvin. Works fine on my Hac Pro and HacBook. --S P.S. I realized that Apple was holding off the release of this kernel for 16 days. I wonder how much testing can be done in 16 days on a kernel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SticMAC™ Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 My McDell Dimension 9200(XPS410), NO PROBLEM!!! No restores needed SticMAN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synthology Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 My Sig HackMac works fine with this update. All is Vanilla flavored and running smooth so far. Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tokra128 Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 ok, for all you guys with the new kernel .. is shutdown and restart working ? or not ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M. Carlson Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 Well, got my BIOS-based (thus, non-pcEFI) Vostro 1500 Hackintosh back up. This was a bit of a task because I had to restore several files from single-user mode. I've been using iAKTOS v1.0i2 updated to 10.5.2 with the Kalyway patched pkg. Added to this was Netkas' most recent SpeedStep kernel and AppleSMBIOS.kext v27 (default version) from mac.nub. I figured after installing the Time Machine & Airport updater, I'd have to re-hack my the AppleAirPortBrcm4311.kext plugin in IO80211Family.kext to get my wireless back, but otherwise didn't suspect the misery I was headed for. After installing aforementioned updates, my machine booted and kernel-panicked at the bluescreen. It was only at this point that I learned the TM + Airport thing was a bad idea. Seeing notes in the post that mach_kernel was replaced, I first restored that. Machine booted fine, but I was worried about AppleSMBIOS.kext being changed. I updated this to Netkas' current one, also noted in the post about the evil TM + Airport thing. Well, that one doesn't work for me - I got the eternal bluescreen and never got to Desktop. After downloading the mac.nub default v27 AppleSMBIOS.kext to a USB flash drive and popping back into single-user land, I restored that, deleted all the usual caches, and was back up and running on next reboot. Things feel distinctly slower than before, but at least me ol' HackBook isn't going splat anymore. Looking forward to tasty developments to come in kernel-land after this debacle... (btw, no real difference noted in Airport performance following the re-hack for the Dell 1395) Update: one thing I hadn't noticed when I read this was that my so-called repairs left me with screwed up peripheral arbitration. I had to reboot the machine to get newly attached USB and Firewire devices to work, as nothing was recognized when simply plugged in. I ended up doing a complete reinstall a couple of days ago. This is detailed on my blog, for those who want to check it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SticMAC™ Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 Yip still does! (post32) SticMAN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mindlessss Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 Hi! If there a way to know if a hackintontosh (Kalyway 10.5.1 update to 10.5.2) uses vanilla or not? Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synaesthesia Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 Depends on how you installed it. If you used PC-EFI or not... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_muad_dib Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 i miss the point of doing this update.. unless you have time capsule you can safely pass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pebcak Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 Works well for me, except the system profiler keeps crashing and it now says intel core solo in about mac... (threading works fine though(xbench) and activity monitor shows 4 cpus) intel core 2 quad biostar p35d2-a7 nvidia 8400gs kalyway 10.5.1 + comboupdate edit: Now it boots faster and strange enough the os finally sees my monitor and I can work on it with full resolution now... still crashing system profiler though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingMac Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 I know I am using Darwin Kernel 9.2.0, but how can I know if I am using Vanilla or not? Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Why Me Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 It worked for me. First installed the Netkas new AppleSMBIOS.kext. then the update. Only the memory information in the system profiler was wrong after this so reinstalled myold AppleSMBIOS.kext. MSI neo P965 motherboard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshitcat Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 Installed it, now system reboots just before the grey apple screen would appear. Canno enter in single-user mode since it does not recognize my keyboard. What kexts does this thing update, or how can i roll back my system to how it was yesterday? I am using Kalyway 10.5.2, on an Intel Core 2 Duo hackintosh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironicall Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 Works fine for me Using Kalyway 10.5.2 vanilla plus EFIv8. Seems to have improved my boot times as well. Spec's: Mobo - Asus P5K Premium wifi (wifi working) P35 chipset CPU - Q6600 @ 3.6 GFX - 8800GT Fully supported with dual monitors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johan Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 updates work fine on my system leopard 10.2 ( efi 8, guid) msi powerup 975 intel q6600 nvidia 8800 gtx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chinasky Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 So, it is not recommended if i´m not using now a vanilla kernel? thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ppc7600 Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 First post but been lurking since the end of january. And I have based my hack on hardware proven to work from here. I installed the update on a fresh install, before I read the news. (I was hesitant about the security-update though) but have since installed that one too, and that hasnt destroyed anything either I got another potential problem though, with regards to my permissions, there persists these unrepairable things. se below. What can I do about that - should I worry? I have repaired numerous times i diskutil, but they are unrepairable, as the util says. ********** 2008-03-20 07:42:39 +0100: Disk Utility started. 2008-03-20 07:42:46 +0100: Repairing permissions for “Leo” 2008-03-20 07:43:41 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/libexec/load_hdi" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:41 +0100: Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/DiskManagement.framework/Versions/A/Resources/DiskManagementTool" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:41 +0100: Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/DesktopServicesPriv.framework/Versions/A/Resources/Locum" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:41 +0100: Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Install.framework/Versions/A/Resources/runner" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:41 +0100: Warning: SUID file "sbin/mount_nfs" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:41 +0100: Warning: SUID file "System/Library/Frameworks/SystemConfiguration.framework/Versions/A/Resources/SCHelper" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:41 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/sbin/scselect" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:41 +0100: Warning: SUID file "sbin/umount" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:41 +0100: Warning: SUID file "sbin/ping" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:41 +0100: Warning: SUID file "sbin/ping6" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:41 +0100: Warning: SUID file "sbin/route" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:41 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/sbin/netstat" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:42 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/sbin/traceroute" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:42 +0100: Warning: SUID file "bin/rcp" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:42 +0100: Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Admin.framework/Versions/A/Resources/readconfig" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:42 +0100: Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Admin.framework/Versions/A/Resources/writeconfig" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:42 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/setregion" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:42 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/libexec/authopen" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:42 +0100: Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/Finder.app/Contents/Resources/OwnerGroupTool" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:43 +0100: Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/ARDAgent" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:45 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/login" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:45 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/lib/sa/sadc" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:45 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/libexec/chkpasswd" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:46 +0100: Group differs on "usr/bin/lppasswd", should be 0, group is 26. 2008-03-20 07:43:46 +0100: Permissions differ on "usr/bin/lppasswd", should be -rwxr-xr-x , they are -rwsr-xr-x . 2008-03-20 07:43:46 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/lppasswd" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:46 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/quota" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:46 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/sbin/traceroute6" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Permissions differ on "usr/bin/rlogin", should be -rwsr-xr-x , they are -r-sr-xr-x . 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/rlogin" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/rsh" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/su" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/at" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/atq" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/atrm" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/batch" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/chfn" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/chpass" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/chsh" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/newgrp" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/passwd" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Permissions differ on "usr/share/man/man1/atq.1.gz", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- . 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Permissions differ on "usr/share/man/man1/atrm.1.gz", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- . 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Permissions differ on "usr/share/man/man1/batch.1.gz", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- . 2008-03-20 07:43:47 +0100: Permissions differ on "usr/share/man/man8/halt.8.gz", should be -r--r--r-- , they are lr--r--r-- . 2008-03-20 07:43:48 +0100: Warning: SUID file "Applications/Utilities/Activity Monitor.app/Contents/Resources/pmTool" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:48 +0100: Warning: SUID file "Applications/Utilities/Keychain Access.app/Contents/Resources/kcproxy" has been modified and will not be repaired. 2008-03-20 07:43:53 +0100: Permissions differ on "usr/X11/lib/libX11.6.2.0.dylib", should be lrwxr-xr-x , they are -rwxr-xr-x . 2008-03-20 07:43:54 +0100: 2008-03-20 07:43:54 +0100: Permissions repair complete I think I should also introduce myself and my system Intel Core2 Duo E6750 ASUS P5K-E /WiFi-Ap 2*2 GB Corsair TwinX 6400 Asus EN8600GT 256MB Leopard 10.5.2 (kalyway) installed from dvd without graphics GUID vanilla and efi after conbo-update and 10.5.2 kernel I installed nvinject nv.33 and all software updates available after that. I just wanted to know if I should reinstall or repair before installing software, (cs3 suite Lightroom etc) I have had another install before this one, but after installing Aperture 2.01 or putting an IDE-drive in it got destroyed and kernel-panicked all the time. Thus I now got two SATAII drives in it. Best regards As you can see from my name I had (have) a PowerMac 7600. Wonderful machine, but as expensive as the Mac Pros today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironicall Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 So, it is not recommended if i´m not using now a vanilla kernel? thanks Pretty much mate. But then as some people with the vanilla kernel have had issues I think it's a "do at your own risk" kind of thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forceman Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 use with caution, it DOES replace the kernel and other kexts. new Darwin kernel backupd loginwindow Atheros chipset wireless drivers Broadcom chipset wireless drivers IPFirewall.kext System.kext AppleShare afpfs.kext DiskImage.framework Metadata.framework (mds/aka Spotlight) Did actually work fine for me and I wasn't on the vanilla kernel because the graphics kext would drop out, now it's fine. Darwin Kernel Version 9.2.2: Tue Mar 4 21:17:34 PST 2008; root:xnu-1228.4.31~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stravaganza Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 Installed it, now system reboots just before the grey apple screen would appear. Canno enter in single-user mode since it does not recognize my keyboard. What kexts does this thing update, or how can i roll back my system to how it was yesterday? I am using Kalyway 10.5.2, on an Intel Core 2 Duo hackintosh. Totally off the topic. I thought I like your signature first. Then I carefully looked at them. They looked too real. Now I am confused. Should I like them or hate them? It's weird. --S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
^_^ Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 ok, for all you guys with the new kernel .. is shutdown and restart working ? or not ? Works in my case, not sure about sleep Update, After a few reboot, it works normally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshitcat Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 I thought I like your signature first. Then I carefully looked at them. They looked too real. Now I am confused. Should I like them or hate them? It's weird. --S You'd better like them. Trust me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts