Jump to content
88 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

i think it's because you using geekbench 2.2.6 (x64), and diazz used the latest version with 32bit test :wacko:

ok thk i going test on 32bits

Wath the latest version?

I Check update and nothing... :(

Geekbench sores isn't kernel testing guys...

this true :blush:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this mine:

http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=668591Sanstitre.png

 

6311???

 

you have one problem no... my phenon x4 3.7Ghz give 8530...

@Diazz Check your boot.plis if you have P-States and C-States Generate=Yes

I do not think there is problem in OS X , here is my WiN 8.1 result:

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/193832

 

And yeah, can somone plzz make me good .plis for my configuration. . .Tnx ;)

 

--------

 

Maybe i am getting so low result because i am running benchmark in 32Bit mode?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think there is problem in OS X , here is my WiN 8.1 result:

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/193832

 

And yeah, can somone plzz make me good .plis for my configuration. . .Tnx ;)

 

--------

 

Maybe i am getting so low result because i am running benchmark in 32Bit mode?

Sure 64 runs faster :), but maybe u getting so low result because u running benchmark on an MSI Board?! hahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

First test with Mavericks without adjustments of the graphics card, adjustments of the graphics card takes place at a later date

SingleCore Score --> 1897 MultiCor Score--> 8387

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/230860

 

 

after installed cuds etc.

SingleCore Score --> 1862 MultiCor Score--> 8662

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/230885

 

 

 

new one

SingleCore Score --> 2109 MultiCor Score--> 9726

 

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/231753

Edited by spakk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heya Guys... =^)

 

Same setup as my sig: running at 200x20=4.0Ghz RAM @ 1600

Benchmark in 10.6.8 .. Anv V8_R2  :) 32-bit GeekBench

post-513502-0-56452800-1427989694_thumb.png

Oh and just for nostalgia's sake my old faithful ECS (RIP 2004-2013)...

post-513502-0-62254600-1427989746_thumb.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hummmmm

 

Machine type :

AMD Athlon II X2 250, 6Gb DDR3@1300Mhz, SSD OCZ Vertex 2+, Radeon 5770 fully ssupported, audio USB card ( onboard not supported ), MB : ASUS M5A78-LM-LX

 

Kernel :

sh-3.2# uname -a
Darwin Mac-Pro-de-chocoboss.local 12.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 12.5.0: суббота,  9 ноября 2013 г. 07:52:39 (MSK); *patched-2050.48.11_10.8.5_Sinetek_Anv_Bronzovka_rc5/BUILD/obj//RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
 

 

163223Capturede769cran20131221a768095632

 

so, seems bad, but perfectly working, no bug with my graphical card, my usb audio card is 100% working.

 

I boot without bootflag :D

 

PS : I'm french ok :P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With OC +23%, so 3.7Ghz, I can g0 to 3.9 Ghz I think but I will not take risk at 8 o'clock AM XD

 

308445Capturede769cran20131224a768082316

 

My cores are more efficient than gil's :D

 

Regor are rly nice for OC, but as I can see, not better than A8 chip

 

OC parameters http://www.hardware.fr/myocdb.com/fiche22928.html

 

I don't own geek bench, so 32 bit testing

 

Purely bios OC, no other trick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With OC +23%, so 3.7Ghz, I can g0 to 3.9 Ghz I think but I will not take risk at 8 o'clock AM XD

 

308445Capturede769cran20131224a768082316

 

My cores are more efficient than gil's :D

 

Regor are rly nice for OC, but as I can see, not better than A8 chip

 

OC parameters http://www.hardware.fr/myocdb.com/fiche22928.html

 

I don't own geek bench, so 32 bit testing

 

Purely bios OC, no other trick

I have not overclocked my CPU, the test is carried out on standard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...