it works differently now, there is no "commpage" and it doesn't need to be enabled, it's just always on and fires as needed.
i'll take a break from all this and see if an idea comes I guess.
Mountain Lion kernel testing on AMD (don't ask help here: use the Help Topic)
Started by theconnactic, Aug 03 2012 07:32 AM
Mountain Lion AMD legacy kernel x64_86 ssse3 ssse3 emulator
2463 replies to this topic
#981
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:00 AM
#982
Posted 18 December 2012 - 03:24 AM
You have to patch dyld to make it work. There is a huge problem on my machine with 64 bit processes, they don't spawn at all.
I have an exam tomorrow, but I have an interesting idea about debugging I'll be checking out after that.
I have an exam tomorrow, but I have an interesting idea about debugging I'll be checking out after that.
#983
Posted 18 December 2012 - 04:07 PM
Justin Edwards, Donk, Ham4ever and all you guys, please join #legacykernel at chat.osx86.hu (IRC), so you can talk with us real time. Otherwise, the topic will grow unreasonably large but with little useful information. In other words, a very low info to noise ratio, if we understand ourselves.
Thank you.
#984
Posted 22 December 2012 - 02:10 PM
I want to remind you that theconnatic has created this site, to aim primaer to create an Mountain Lion kernel !! Although I find the success with Snow Leopard with 64-bit kernel very well but we should necessarily go back to the roots of this page! My fear is that we are talking past each other as soon as we discuss by now three systems here.
Then should follow the proposal of sinetek be done and open up more pages.
#985
Posted 22 December 2012 - 02:49 PM
I must say, I agree with spakk. Maybe we should split the thread? AMD Development is in need of some new topics anyway.
#986
Posted 22 December 2012 - 02:52 PM
If you like I can try and split Snow Leopard and Lion AMD discussions to separate topics, but it might take a while considering it's all mixed together. Would you like that?
#987
Posted 22 December 2012 - 02:58 PM
#988
Posted 22 December 2012 - 03:08 PM
OK, I'll begin then...the split will happen in bits and pieces, but it will get done. 
And one thing: if anyone finds a post of theirs moved to an operating system when you were really talking about a different one, let me know and I'll move it accordingly.
And one thing: if anyone finds a post of theirs moved to an operating system when you were really talking about a different one, let me know and I'll move it accordingly.
#989
Posted 22 December 2012 - 03:12 PM
PookyMacMan, on 22 December 2012 - 03:08 PM, said:
OK, I'll begin then...the split will happen in bits and pieces, but it will get done. 
And one thing: if anyone finds a post of theirs moved to an operating system when you were really talking about a different one, let me know and I'll move it accordingly.
And one thing: if anyone finds a post of theirs moved to an operating system when you were really talking about a different one, let me know and I'll move it accordingly.
many thanks for your effort, PookyMacMan. I hope the others agree!
#990
Posted 22 December 2012 - 03:50 PM
yes is a good idea
#991
Posted 23 December 2012 - 06:55 PM
Below is a new kernel to test.
Implemented latest changes by Sinetek (including opemu)
Removed old style ssse3emulator.
Diff and kernel below (build with -march=k8, for AMD thus, also modded idt64.s)
@Sinetek, could you take a peak?
@Others: Please test...
Also used my amd_insn_patcher on dyld (for AMD dyld).
libSystem no longer contains sysenter instruction (checked).
both amd_insn_patcher and 10.8.2 dyld here
Implemented latest changes by Sinetek (including opemu)
Removed old style ssse3emulator.
Diff and kernel below (build with -march=k8, for AMD thus, also modded idt64.s)
@Sinetek, could you take a peak?
@Others: Please test...
Also used my amd_insn_patcher on dyld (for AMD dyld).
libSystem no longer contains sysenter instruction (checked).
both amd_insn_patcher and 10.8.2 dyld here
Attached Files
#992
Posted 23 December 2012 - 07:01 PM
i hope if i test now but my flash memory isnt with me now 
will try later sorry
will try later sorry
#993
Posted 23 December 2012 - 07:12 PM
Andy Vandijck, on 23 December 2012 - 06:55 PM, said:
Here is a new kernel to test.
Implemented latest changes by Sinetek (including opemu)
Removed old style ssse3emulator.
Diff and kernel here (build with -march=k8, for AMD thus, also modded idt64.s)
@Sinetek, could you take a peak?
@Others: Please test...
Also used my amd_insn_patcher on dyld (for AMD dyld).
libSystem no longer contains sysenter instruction (checked).
both amd_insn_patcher and 10.8.2 dyld here
Implemented latest changes by Sinetek (including opemu)
Removed old style ssse3emulator.
Diff and kernel here (build with -march=k8, for AMD thus, also modded idt64.s)
@Sinetek, could you take a peak?
@Others: Please test...
Also used my amd_insn_patcher on dyld (for AMD dyld).
libSystem no longer contains sysenter instruction (checked).
both amd_insn_patcher and 10.8.2 dyld here
Will try to boot 10.8.2 myHack USB Installer with this kernel, because I have no complete installation of ML atm.
#994
Posted 23 December 2012 - 07:15 PM
#995
Posted 23 December 2012 - 07:19 PM
will give it a try tomorrow i guess ..cant rite now
very curious though
very curious though
#996
Posted 23 December 2012 - 07:33 PM
Hahahaha working on my machine anyway (Intel though)
Need AMD tests...
Need AMD tests...
#997
Posted 23 December 2012 - 07:36 PM
Kernel is LP64 on Athlon II X2 215
#998
Posted 23 December 2012 - 07:50 PM
Tested it but my launchd panics but i´m using the patched one. Have to try the other one.
But it seems we go trough the problem before.
But it seems we go trough the problem before.
#999
Posted 23 December 2012 - 08:00 PM
AnV kernel, KP on ML10.8.2 myHack USB, Phenom II x4 965.
Do I need patched corecrypto?
EDIT: Btw, check my post number
Do I need patched corecrypto?
EDIT: Btw, check my post number
#1000
Posted 23 December 2012 - 08:06 PM
Yes, you do...



Sign In
Create Account









