Rosetta and Driver Upgrades; New Build is Leaked

What ATI cards are supported? I checked the site and noe of the FAQ's have been updated yet.

http://wiki.osx86project.org/wiki/index.php/HCL_10.4.3

http://forum.osx86project.org/index.php?showtopic=4301 (end of thread)

http://www.win2osx.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1665

can someone please post the ati drivers... i dont want to get the new build a i have 10.4.1 with the 10.4.3 framework working perfectly

The 10.4.3 drivers will not work on the 10.4.1 kernel. You need the full 10.4.3 if you want the new ATi support.

I have 8F1099 and can post it, but where are they located ?

Essentials.pkg

But as I say, it's pointless trying to use them on 10.4.1.

i am a little confused and seeking some help. i installed the deadmoo on a vmware partition with little problems. i installed the changes from maxxus and dd'd the image to another drive. this drive booted without a hitch on a thinkpad T30 and a hp pavilion zt3000. i tried to install from the cd for 1099 with no luck. i just completed a download of 1111 and i am anxious to help out with some of the porting stuff. i have read the stuff for 1111 and maxxus working on the changes to make a bootable cd image. i was wondering if it is possible to mount my drive from the laptop to my g5 through usb and copy off the stuff from the dmg? once this is done i want to find out what it would take to setup the drivers to support my 1920x1200 resolution. i would be very grateful to anyone who could assist.

DVD Player now works in build 8F1111.

I tried forever to get any software to play a DVD in 10.4.1 but couldn't.

has anyone tried one of the new new ati cards? i've got a x1300. seems like newer=more likely to be supported?

Here's the ATI Radeon 9700 drivers from 8f1111. (URL removed to comply with DMCA)

So what is the deal with Rossetta supporting Altivec now? Is this unconfirmed or what?

Is anybody else surprised to see Apple trying to do this?

So what is the deal with Rossetta supporting Altivec now? Is this unconfirmed or what?

 

Is anybody else surprised to see Apple trying to do this?

My developer said that he tested Altivec apps and they did not run with Altivec and XBench didn't show any improvements while running in Rosetta in the Altivec portion of the test. So basically someone made up a HUGE hoax that Rosetta supported Altivec, which means no it's not true.

My developer said that he tested Altivec apps and they did not run with Altivec and XBench didn't show any improvements while running in Rosetta in the Altivec portion of the test. So basically someone made up a HUGE hoax that Rosetta supported Altivec, which means no it's not true.

Can you verify if 8f1111A could be an internal MAC release?

Does apple ever append a letter to the end? Typically an update would be like 8f1112 or they'd restart at 8g....

Anyway.

Here's the ATI Radeon 9700 drivers from 8f1111. [Removed for DMCA compliance]

HI

Can you post the driver for radeon 9800 too?

I have updated the 10.4.1 to the 10.4.3 and then I've deleted all the ati*.kext file and put the ati.kext from jas. But I think I have made a big mistake doing this.

Does apple ever append a letter to the end? Typically an update would be like 8f1112 or they'd restart at 8g....

Anyway.

Yes Apple appends an A to the end of minor updates, but there is NO 8F1111A as far as my dev or I knows.

I've been testing 8F1111 with Maxxus's patched oah750 and oah750d taken from build 8F1099.

My impression is : It looks stable, however, iTunes won't start up (it pops up an 'unknown error -50' message) and several x86 applications (not the ones bundled with the OS) crash unexpectedly due to

BAD_INSTRUCTION or BAD_ACCESS followed by a hex digit. (At least that's what it says in the CrashReporter). Anybody experiencing the same problems ?

I've been testing 8F1111 with Maxxus's patched oah750 and oah750d taken from build 8F1099.

 

My impression is : It looks stable, however, iTunes won't start up (it pops up an 'unknown error -50' message) and several x86 applications (not the ones bundled with the OS) crash unexpectedly due to

BAD_INSTRUCTION or BAD_ACCESS followed by a hex digit. (At least that's what it says in the CrashReporter). Anybody experiencing the same problems ?

How did you go about installing 8f111 with those old patches? I have the dmg file... what do I do from there?

I've been testing 8F1111 with Maxxus's patched oah750 and oah750d taken from build 8F1099.

 

My impression is : It looks stable, however, iTunes won't start up (it pops up an 'unknown error -50' message) and several x86 applications (not the ones bundled with the OS) crash unexpectedly due to

BAD_INSTRUCTION or BAD_ACCESS followed by a hex digit. (At least that's what it says in the CrashReporter). Anybody experiencing the same problems ?

I know why... You didn't install your OS in english

If you read the informations of the file "iTunes" in the folder applications, go to langages and uncheck all of the langages, and just keep english.

Then iTunes will work

I know why... You didn't install your OS in english

 

If you read the informations of the file "iTunes" in the folder applications, go to langages and uncheck all of the langages, and just keep english.

 

Then iTunes will work

Thank you very much Tetu! Infact I installed OSX in a language different from english.

You're welcome, I had the same problem because I installed it in French

My developer said that he tested Altivec apps and they did not run with Altivec and XBench didn't show any improvements while running in Rosetta in the Altivec portion of the test. So basically someone made up a HUGE hoax that Rosetta supported Altivec, which means no it's not true.

Well this certainly makes more sense to me than Rosetta supporting Altivec. Do to the fact that Atlivec beats the {censored} out of SSE3, it really makes no sense to emulate it and that logic likely applies to automatic translation as well. Furthermore, Apple had seemed to make it clear that Altivec was dead as far as OS X is concerned and otherwise only G3 emulation by Rosseta.

Hi all. I've been reading, with growing envy and frustration, everyones trials a successes with OSx86.

I wanna try it too any kind soul out there willing to give me an invite to demonoid so that I can play as well?

Thanks

Darrin

Hi all. I've been reading, with growing envy and frustration, everyones trials a successes with OSx86.

I wanna try it too any kind soul out there willing to give me an invite to demonoid so that I can play as well?

 

Thanks

 

Darrin

Oops no contact - darrinrobert@hotmail.com - that should help

just check maxxuss' site or google or a meta site like ts.kurtubba.com that searches demonoid, mininova, tpb, and all the top torrent sites for your all of your legal torrent needs.

who wants x86 itunes.pkg for 10.4.3, send me a PM, I'll give you.

I think it is on internet allready, but just in case..

Ok, so now that the new build is out, can someone please outline how they were able to use the previous leaked version patch on this version (please?)

ya, patching 1111 directly after converting it makes it unbootable. vmware gives this error in debug mode:

*** VMware Workstation internal monitor error ***

vcpu-0:ASSERT vmcore/vmm/cpu/segment.h:444 bugNr=19580

There is a problem in this version of VMware Workstation.

We rely on your feedback to improve the quality of our product. Please submit a support request that describes the problem at our Web page "http://www.vmware.com/info?id=8". Do not forget to attach the log file (C:\...\My Documents\My Virtual Machines\Other -macosx\vmware.log) and the core file (C:\...\My Documents\My Virtual Machines\Other -macosx\vmware-core.gz).

To collect files to submit to VMware support, run vm-support.vbs.

We appreciate your feedback,

-- the VMware Workstation team.

How did you patch 8F1111?

i used Maxxuss v1.1a patcher on the converted iso, but it and the unpatched version crash vmware