Jump to content
30960 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Hi, what will it return when typing in this in Terminal?

sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode

Hi, could you please try removing the first patch and attempt to boot with Clover r4155+? Thanks in advance.

Sure thing, Just give me a minute to prepare a bootable USB with clover r4155. I'll be back with the results ;)

Hi, what will it return when typing in this in Terminal?

sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode

Hi, could you please try removing the first patch and attempt to boot with Clover r4155+? Thanks in advance.

This  :)

 

captu101.png

No. XCPM is not enabled. Could you please post your config? (Remove SN etc of course)

Sure, I just didn't add the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> yet but here it is, my original config.plist

 

I will add the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> and check back in a second.

No. XCPM is not enabled. Could you please post your config? (Remove SN etc of course)

I added the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> and <key>AppleIntelCPUPM</key> and the results is 1

config.plist.zip

Sure, I just didn't add the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> yet but here it is, my original config.plist

 

I will add the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> and check back in a second.

I added the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> and <key>AppleIntelCPUPM</key> and the results is 1

Great. Thanks for your confirmation and congratulations!

  • Like 1

@PMHeart

 

 

All test is under Sierra 10.12.6

 

As cyberdev :I added the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> and <key>AppleIntelCPUPM</key> and  the results is 0

As Chris1111: I added the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> <key>AppleIntelCPUPM</key> <key>KernelPm</key> ans the results is 0

 

I still have the patch for testing

 

 

Edit: with the patch, sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode   The result is 0

Absolutely. AppleIntelCPUPM will patch AICPUPM.kext, but with XCPM in place it won't even be loaded, so patching it just makes no sense.

The only thing that I need to know now is without the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> and with the previous patches in post I had more subtle power management while the system was idle as you can see in my power gadget graphs which is not the same with the new patch is that normal?

post-1011040-0-15409600-1502384283_thumb.png

post-1011040-0-00163300-1502384298_thumb.png

Absolutely. AppleIntelCPUPM will patch AICPUPM.kext, but with XCPM in place it won't even be loaded, so patching it just makes no sense.

@PMHeart

 

 

All test is under Sierra 10.12.6

 

As cyberdev :I added the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> and <key>AppleIntelCPUPM</key> and  the results is 0

As Chris1111: I added the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> <key>AppleIntelCPUPM</key> <key>KernelPm</key> ans the results is 0

 

I still have the patch for testing

 

 

 

Edit: with the patch, sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode   The result is 0

 

with KernelIvyXCPM=true  alone, panic cpu

 

@PMHeart

 

 

All test is under Sierra 10.12.6

 

As cyberdev :I added the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> and <key>AppleIntelCPUPM</key> and  the results is 0

As Chris1111: I added the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> <key>AppleIntelCPUPM</key> <key>KernelPm</key> ans the results is 0

 

I still have the patch for testing

 

 

 

Edit: with the patch, sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode   The result is 0

 

with KernelIvyXCPM=true  alone, panic cpu

 

I Remove that one

<key>AppleIntelCPUPM</key>

 

Not need  ;) 

  • Like 1

The only thing that I need to know now is without the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> and with the previous patches in post I had more subtle power management while the system was idle as you can see in my power gadget graphs which is not the same with the new patch is that normal?

You were lack of the critical patch - _xcpm_bootstrap from what I could see in your old post. So XCPM wasn't really enabled, and previous you were probably playing with AICPUPM. To be honest, it's hard for me to say the difference with the two screenshots that you posted.

  • Like 1

All test is under Sierra 10.12.6

 

As cyberdev :I added the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> and <key>AppleIntelCPUPM</key> and  the results is 0

I have <key>AsusAICPUPM</key>and <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> I removed the <key>AppleIntelCPUPM</key> too.

  • Like 1

 

@PMHeart

 

 

All test is under Sierra 10.12.6

 

As cyberdev :I added the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> and <key>AppleIntelCPUPM</key> and  the results is 0

As Chris1111: I added the <key>KernelIvyXCPM</key> <key>AppleIntelCPUPM</key> <key>KernelPm</key> ans the results is 0

 

I still have the patch for testing

 

 

 

Edit: with the patch, sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode   The result is 0

 

with KernelIvyXCPM=true  alone, panic cpu

 

If only setting KernelIvyXCPM = true leads to a kernel panic, then this may be implying us that MSR 0xE2 is locked. Simply turning on KernelPm then.

If with KernelIvyXCPM & KernelPm = true and sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode returns 0, then I can't explain why... That's just weird.

  • Like 2

You were lack of the critical patch - _xcpm_bootstrap from what I could see in your old post. So XCPM wasn't really enabled, and previous you were probably playing with AICPUPM. To be honest, it's hard for me to say the difference with the two screenshots that you posted.

Fair enough, I will do some more tests and see how it goes :)

 

Update: If there's anything that I can provide to help out I'll be more than happy to oblige.

If only setting KernelIvyXCPM = true leads to a kernel panic, then this may be implying us that MSR 0xE2 is locked. Simply turning on KernelPm then.

If with KernelIvyXCPM & KernelPm = true and sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode returns 0, then I can't explain why... That's just weird.

 

I will try again KernelIvyXCPM & KernelPm = true and if sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode returns 0: Maybe i can't use your great job on my system.

 

Update: KernelIvyXCPM & KernelPm = true, panic cpu

 

Thanks

 

Sorry for my english

×
×
  • Create New...