RiceTea Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 CPU Test 168.93 This is awesome!! How do get along with your OSX 10.4.8 install - all stable? System clock works correctly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icyderguru Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 Just for comparison, here is my Core 2 Duo 6600 running at 3806 MHZ, 2GB DDR2845, x1600 pro Ordered a MSI 7900 GTO today, cant wait to get it bofors: I love your rig building posts, everything is so detailed and well structured, i hope you can archieve to get Dual Displays working sooner or later - if not a 30 inch Dell isnt too shaby and yeah, i have set correct fsb values Results 301.72 System Info Xbench Version 1.3 System Version 10.4.8 (8L2127) Physical RAM 2048 MB Model ACPI Drive Type Maxtor 6V320F0 CPU Test 198.96 GCD Loop 450.90 23.77 Mops/sec Floating Point Basic 217.17 5.16 Gflop/sec vecLib FFT 160.82 5.31 Gflop/sec Floating Point Library 141.56 24.65 Mops/sec Thread Test 382.51 Computation 349.91 7.09 Mops/sec, 4 threads Lock Contention 421.82 18.15 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads Memory Test 206.79 System 247.51 Allocate 201.10 738.52 Kalloc/sec Fill 263.88 12830.31 MB/sec Copy 297.75 6150.00 MB/sec Stream 177.58 Copy 173.11 3575.42 MB/sec Scale 177.97 3676.90 MB/sec Add 181.21 3860.08 MB/sec Triad 178.21 3812.28 MB/sec Quartz Graphics Test 316.98 Line 233.51 15.55 Klines/sec [50% alpha] Rectangle 304.42 90.88 Krects/sec [50% alpha] Circle 289.47 23.60 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha] Bezier 259.88 6.55 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha] Text 1106.38 69.21 Kchars/sec OpenGL Graphics Test 317.61 Spinning Squares 317.61 402.91 frames/sec User Interface Test 903.81 Elements 903.81 4.15 Krefresh/sec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe75 Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 icyderguru, what kind of cooling are you using Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icyderguru Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 icyderguru, what kind of cooling are you using everything is running on air with 4 fans (5 if you count the one on the gpu ), (sonic tower), 2 fans on the cpu cooler, 1 blowing air to the ram+northbridge, another one blowing air to the southbridge but if i cant get 4 ram sticks to work with the 333 strap i will have to use the 266+50% setting (3,6 ghz) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe75 Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 I could live with 3.6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted November 7, 2006 Author Share Posted November 7, 2006 bofors, dose your ram get to hot, because it seems as though you have big concerns. No, not with two the two 50mm Delta fans on it and copper heatspreaders. It seems to be just a few degrees above ambient during Rember (memtest) memory testing, same goes for the northbridge heatsink. But I did notice the memory getting hot in my other box, that is under 1.8v, 4-4-4-12, DDR2-667 (not overclocked). I want see what happens with 4 x 1GB first, but I am actually thinking about adding a third Delta 50mm to cool the memory or switching to two 60mm fans (50mm seems a little narrow). This is awesome!! How do get along with your OSX 10.4.8 install - all stable? System clock works correctly? I have not done any rigorous testing on the clock but it seems about right. It kept the time straight for the few minutes I watched it and the GUI animation speed seems normal now (it was hyper before I set the FSB kernel flag). I am using the version of Mifki's kenrel that JaS but on his 10.4.8, that is Rufus build 0.0.3. It is not quite 100% stable. I have had my system a few twice during Rember testing on all memory. But on the other hand, it completed 15 full loops (over several hours) with no problem and because Rember allocates all free memory (leaving none for anything else) it is not surprising that the system might have some problems when it is running. I have also had some issues with Rember on my PowerMac G5. EDIT: My system just rebooted itself while running Rember. I am going to try testing on less RAM and see if the problem goes away. EDIT 2: This Rember generated instability does not appear when testing less that the full amount of RAM, it really is not a legitimate problem. Anyways, there is a new version of Mifki's kernel availible (he claims it is perfect) and I will be switching to that soon. i hope you can archieve to get Dual Displays working sooner or later I am working on the dual display issue full time now and do not plan to stop until it is fixed. It looks trivial and in fact, looking over the Natit source, it appears that it might already work with a CRT and LCD. EDIT: The is new version of Natit that is set up to use Plists, so no programming is actually required to experiment with it now and it has removed the CRT vs. LCD business: http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?sho...1833&st=29# EDIT2: I now have dual displays working in extended desktop mode on this machine with a 3D Fusion 7600GS (VGA/DVI) and two Samsung 712n panels. Here is the version of Natit that is setup to make this work: http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?sho...view=getnewpost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David7586 Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 guys does anyone know the compatibility of the bad axe 2's sound chontroller? instead of the 9221 series the bad axe 2 iwill be suing the Intel® High Definition Audio (Sigmatel STAC9274D). I really hope this chipset works because it seems this new revision of the bad axe seems perfect with its enhanced OC'ing abilities Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted November 10, 2006 Author Share Posted November 10, 2006 guys does anyone know the compatibility of the bad axe 2's sound chontroller? instead of the 9221 series the bad axe 2 iwill be suing the Intel® High Definition Audio (Sigmatel STAC9274D). I really hope this chipset works because it seems this new revision of the bad axe seems perfect with its enhanced OC'ing abilities David, I am not sure what the state of OSx86 driver support is for HD Audio, but I would not count on anything. With the 9221 support seems to be limited to stereo out right now and I suspect that with some work we will get the same with 9274. I am trying to wrap up this build both in terms of software and hardware. Hardwise, the Samsung DVD-ROM I have been trying to use with mix results has turn into too much of a hassle with unreliable booting and now apparently the inability to play DVD movies (even the BIOS seems not to like this drive, boots are slower with it in). So, I ordered a Pioneer (which is the brand that Apple uses) DVR-111D from NewEgg for under $38 shipped. Attached is the version of AppleHDA.kext (courtesy of Kiko) that I used to get the 9221 outputing stereo through the blue jack (not the green). Also attached is the latest Mifki/Vitaliy/Daemon kernel which I am using. It automatically detects and sets the FSB speed but requires some particular version of AppleSMBIOS.kext which is included. Here is the complete Xbench with an XFX 7600GS driving dual VGA displays: Results 217.75 System Info Xbench Version 1.3 System Version 10.4.8 (8L2127) Physical RAM 2048 MB Model ACPI Drive Type SoftRAID_Media CPU Test 170.28 GCD Loop 384.56 20.27 Mops/sec Floating Point Basic 185.98 4.42 Gflop/sec vecLib FFT 137.46 4.53 Gflop/sec Floating Point Library 121.37 21.13 Mops/sec Thread Test 326.81 Computation 299.61 6.07 Mops/sec, 4 threads Lock Contention 359.43 15.46 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads Memory Test 229.14 System 228.95 Allocate 194.37 713.78 Kalloc/sec Fill 262.42 12759.52 MB/sec Copy 241.09 4979.54 MB/sec Stream 229.34 Copy 224.02 4627.08 MB/sec Scale 226.45 4678.37 MB/sec Add 235.92 5025.63 MB/sec Triad 231.34 4948.91 MB/sec Quartz Graphics Test 244.68 Line 199.11 13.26 Klines/sec [50% alpha] Rectangle 257.14 76.77 Krects/sec [50% alpha] Circle 246.12 20.06 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha] Bezier 221.13 5.58 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha] Text 340.32 21.29 Kchars/sec OpenGL Graphics Test 241.60 Spinning Squares 241.60 306.49 frames/sec User Interface Test 690.42 Elements 690.42 3.17 Krefresh/sec Disk Test 108.98 Sequential 196.60 Uncached Write 169.66 104.17 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 300.25 169.88 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 123.08 36.02 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 333.74 167.73 MB/sec [256K blocks] Random 75.39 Uncached Write 35.46 3.75 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 128.30 41.07 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 98.22 0.70 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 145.33 26.97 MB/sec [256K blocks] My disk scores are from a 10 GB partition on the fast edge of a three disk striped RAID set. I ordered four disks but one arrived DOA. and TigerDirect no longer carries these $20 refurbished drives. When I get a forth drive my disk scores should go up by about 30%. EDIT: TigerDirect has the $20 refurbished SATA hard drives back in stock, so I ordered two more. AppleHDA.kext.zip DaemonES_Kernel.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thade Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Thanks for the info... I just ordered a Bad Axe and I have E6400 on the shelf. I'll keep you guys posted on the results Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted November 13, 2006 Author Share Posted November 13, 2006 By the way, in case people don't know, the Bad Axe 2 is starting to show up at retailers: http://www.tankguys.biz/intel-d975xbx2-sat...dio-p-1703.html EDIT: TigerDirect has the original Bad Axe on sale for $200: http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/Se...mp;Sku=I69-2121 (But I certainly think the Bad Axe 2 for $240 is a better deal, we will see how far these old Bad Axes drop in price soon). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted November 13, 2006 Author Share Posted November 13, 2006 This is the Corsair "AirFlow" memory fan designed to work with the uber-expensive Dominator memory: http://www.performance-pcs.com/catalog/ind...oducts_id=20910 It is $22.50 at Performanc-PCs, but I would bet that what I built with a pair of 50mm Delta's is as good or better for about $8.50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 NewEgg now has Bad Axe 2 in stock (for $330 WTF???): http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?...N82E16813121059 TigerDirect has them for $250: http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/Se...mp;Sku=I69-2145 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thade Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 I got my Bad Axe (rev 306) and I'm currently at 8x400 with E6400 with very little fuss so I'm pretty happy with the results so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted November 16, 2006 Author Share Posted November 16, 2006 To go higher with OSx86, you probably need to do the "OC Debug": http://forums.legitreviews.com/about6375.html I found that I was able to run the CPU at the lowest vCore setting, which is good because it runs much cooler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rschultz101 Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 why not abit aw9d board, cheaper, dual gigE + sound ? http://www.nordichardware.com/Reviews/?pag...p;skrivelse=489 for me, just looking for 6+ sata, the asus is more money, ASUS P5W DH DELUXE/WIFI-AP has wifi,... also looking for cheap, cool , quiet cpu, so far on the D 352 celeron, is running hotter than E6300,... at least cheap to start for a server thanks, Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted November 16, 2006 Author Share Posted November 16, 2006 The Abit AW9D Max is a very popular board at Xtreme Systems: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=115839 I too like the idea of getting dual ethernet on a board in this price range. It also has an eSATA port off an Sil 3132 controller which should work with OSx86: http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=24254 However, I am not sure what LAN and audio chips it uses, so there could be issues with OSx86 compatibility there. Personally, I am sticking with the Intel boards for now. This is for a few reasons, one is that I want to continue to advocate on getting EFI working on OSx86. Intel is almost the only vendor that offers EFI motherboards. Another reason is that Apple now bases its own motherboards, to the extent of even making the firmware compatible, on Intel boards. The lastest reason I am favoring Intel, is that I am very pleased with my Bad Axe (which I got for much less than a new Abit AW9D Max). While I may have been able to overclock a little higher on some other board, my system runs great. My vCore is set all the down, so my E6300 run very cool. Finally, being a former Mac person, I have no hands-on experience with Asus, Gigabyte, Abit or others. I would like to take steps to avoid getting a bad board, so Intel is a safe, conservative choice for me. Now, I am waiting to see some overclocking results from the Bad Axe 2. If it overclocks much better than the original, it could really justify the price of a new one. _Demonoid.com__MAC_OS_X_10_4_8_Intel_Only_Jas_re_seed__SSE3_Only_NO_AMD__657855.0704.torrent.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thade Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 Quote: To go higher with OSx86, you probably need to do the "OC Debug": http://forums.legitreviews.com/about6375.html I found that I was able to run the CPU at the lowest vCore setting, which is good because it runs much cooler. I hesitate to do the debug mod for a couple of reasons. I haven't been able to verify that it has been done on a rev 306. Also, I am currently at 50% OC and I was under the impression that the MB would automatically max out at 30%. There may be something different about this rev I also picked up a sb Live! external which is working great. I boot into Win mostly for gamers and didn't want to swap blue-green connectors. My old Asus MB had a pop up for choosing boot disk. This was great because my OSs are on seperate disks so I used that as my "boot menu". No such feature on the Bad Axe that I can find so I went to the chain0 method and it's working fine Temp monitor app works but I believe it's wrong. Idle temps in OSX 50C vs 36-39C in Win and bios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted November 16, 2006 Author Share Posted November 16, 2006 I hesitate to do the debug mod for a couple of reasons. I haven't been able to verify that it has been done on a rev 306. Also, I am currently at 50% OC and I was under the impression that the MB would automatically max out at 30%. There may be something different about this rev They changed the BIOS a while back to enable 50% OC, my rev 305 Bad Axe had the same option without doing the "OC Debug" mod. With the "OC Debug" you are just connecting a jumper that Intel clipped, it enables more OC features in BIOS and nothing more. There really is no risk. Temp monitor app works but I believe it's wrong. Idle temps in OSX 50C vs 36-39C in Win and bios How are you measuring temp. in OS X? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenman100 Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 They changed the BIOS a while back to enable 50% OC, my rev 305 Bad Axe had the same option without doing the "OC Debug" mod. With the "OC Debug" you are just connecting a jumper that Intel clipped, it enables more OC features in BIOS and nothing more. There really is no risk.How are you measuring temp. in OS X? http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=28051 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thade Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 Temperature Monitor app. If functions but I don't believe it's accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DRKRONNIN Posted November 17, 2006 Share Posted November 17, 2006 Hello everyone Im a NOOB here and Ive been reading this forum for a few months as a guest and finally decided to take part. Im in the process of picking parts for my Conroe OSx86 box but im stuck on one thing. Im planning on getting the ASUS P5W DH becuase I like its features over the ones offered on the intel "Bad Axe" board. I have yet to hear anything wrong with it aside from the fact that the wireless router doesnt work in OSx86. Is there any factors that place the Intel "Bad Axe" board over the Asus P5W DH? My problem is I'm trying to select graphics cards but Im unsure if "Crossfire" is supported by OSx86 has anyone ever had any success running a OSx86 box with dual graphics Cards? Im looking at the new x1950 pro cards Here Im unsure if there supported (Checking the compatability list at the wiki). I wouldnt mind running crossfire with two of these. BTW Im still a noob when it comes to OCing a computer so if anyone has any tips feel free to tell me. Thanks again everyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted November 17, 2006 Author Share Posted November 17, 2006 Is there any factors that place the Intel "Bad Axe" board over the Asus P5W DH? No, not really. The P5W is also a top choice for OSx86: http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=23246 My problem is I'm trying to select graphics cards but Im unsure if "Crossfire" is supported by OSx86 has anyone ever had any success running a OSx86 box with dual graphics Cards? We have made a major progress with graphics cards lately, but I am not sure if anybody has even tried sticking two graphics cards in a Hackintosh. Furthermore, I do not think Crossfire or SLI is supported by OS X's drivers (yet). BTW Im still a noob when it comes to OCing a computer so if anyone has any tips feel free to tell me. This was my first overclock, so I am hardly an expert. I think northbridge cooling is an important issue with overclocking these boards. Other than that, overclocking is a simple "trial & error" process, so be prepared to spend a few hours tweaking parameters. The key voltages seem to be vMCH (this is why northbridge cooling is important), vDIMM and vCore (although this seems to have had no effect on my overclock). One approach is to raise them all to maximum (safe) values, find your maximum overclock and then lower the voltages until your overclock is unstable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DRKRONNIN Posted November 18, 2006 Share Posted November 18, 2006 Thanks Alot for you help bofors!!!! Im planning on building my machine so I can run Final Cut and Avid Xpress on one system. I thought both boards seemed really good so my deciding factor is going to be based soley on which one i can get the best deal on when I go to buy. I also wanted to know is it possible to build the machine, set up a raid 0 configuration then boot xp pro and osx86? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted November 18, 2006 Author Share Posted November 18, 2006 You certainly can dual boot XP and OSx86, although I don't run Windows. Setting up internal SATA RAID sets with Disk Utility now works with 10.4.8, but you can not boot off them (yet). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted November 19, 2006 Author Share Posted November 19, 2006 Here are a couple notes for people thinking about building an overclocked Core 2 Duo system. Fry's / Outpost.com has the E6400 on sale for $207 shipped: http://shop3.outpost.com/product/4893650 Spending an extra $25 or so more for it over an E6300 is certainly worth the money because you get a multiplier of 8 instead of 7. That would place my overcock at 3.7GHz (although realisticly I would expect a little less) over the 3.3GHz I am at. However, when shopping for a chip to overclock, one now also has the option of buying "Xeon" branded Conroe's. These are supposed to be of higher quailty: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=122224 So instead of buying E6600, I may spend a little more and get a Xeon 3060 (which is technically identical) instead: http://store.pagecomputers.com/store/produ...&scs=NEXTAG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts