cipherworld Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Using Photoshop CS or CS2 (or PS 7) ================================================== 1.) Download Image from http://www.quicklance.com/test.jpg 2.) Save it to computer and then open it up in Photoshop 3.) From there please apply a 'radial blur' with the settings at: Amount = 100 Blur Method = Spin Quality = Best Using a stop watch / ps timer see how long it takes to apply this filter Please list your mac/pc system, cpu details, amount of ram and the time it took for the test, just so we can get an idea of how different mac machines handle this task. My Result: ================================= 137.4 Secs, G5 1.6G, 2GB RAM. Mac OSX 10.4.3 Photoshop CS2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jfn Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 (edited) ~9 minutes 1.8Ghz P4 M, 512mb RAM Mac OSX 10.4.3 (8f1099) Photoshop CS2 ouch! Edited December 6, 2005 by jfn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackt283 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 (edited) 5 minutes 20 eMac G4 1ghz, 768mb RAM Mac OS 10.4.3 Photoshop CS2 There is something wrong if a P4 that should be much faster than my eMac is taking almost twice as long to complete such a task. Is Rosetta not as fast as people say? Or is it just the amount of RAM and the processor speed? I would be interested to see how faster processors handle the task. Edited December 6, 2005 by jackt283 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
39thRonin Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 (edited) Here are my results: Software: Adobe Photoshop CS2 Hardware Overview: Machine Name: Apple Development Platform - Machine Model: Dell 8400 CPU Type: ADP2,1 Number Of CPUs: 2 CPU Speed: 2.99 GHz L2 Cache (per CPU): 1 MB CPU Features: FPU VME DE PSE TSC MSR PAE MCE CX8 APIC SEP MTRR PGE MCA CMOV PAT PSE36 CLFSH DS ACPI MMX FXSR SSE SSE2 SS HTT TM SSE3 MON DSCPL TPR Memory: 1 GB Bus Speed: 3.2 GHz Boot ROM Version: A07 (Dell Inc.) Display: Type: VGA-Compatible Controller Bus: PCI VRAM (Total): 128 MB Vendor: ATI (0x1002) Device ID: 0x5b60 Revision ID: 0x0000 Displays: Display: Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Depth: 32-bit Color Core Image: Supported Main Display: Yes Mirror: Off Online: Yes Quartz Extreme: Supported Running 10.4.3 BF1111 w/Maxxuss kernel mods (No NX, CPUID) Test time: 1 minute, 52 seconds NOTE: This test was run with Azureas running in the background with three torrents being dl'd. Edited December 6, 2005 by jbacko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghw9132 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Photoshop CS2 3 minutes 26 seconds. 10.4.1 with 10.4.3 update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrrjrr Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 149 seconds (2 minutes 29 seconds) Dell Inspiron 5150, P4 3.0GHz, 1.2GB RAM. Mac OSX 10.4.1 with 10.4.3 Userland Update Photoshop CS2 Same machine does 106 seconds (1 minute 46 seconds) in WindowsXP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poseidon Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 (edited) My system: G5 Dual 2.0 Ghz 1.5 GB RAM 160 GB HDD, PhotoShop CS2 Resault: 69.5 sec. (1 minute 09 sec) fine Edit: My osx86 8F1111= 108 sec. Edited December 22, 2005 by poseidon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balamut Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Hmm ... Its odd... On Dual Xeon 3.4 with 2GB of ram it did it in 128 sec. under 1099 and it took about 18 sec. under XP Weird Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mvp30 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 My system is a 945G chipset with P4 2.8 Mhz dual core 512 mb. cs 59 secs. Not done yet on the PowerBook G4-400. Will let you know then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac@amd Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 G4 MDD Dual 867 in 124 sec. with 13 program's running in background. 2Gb memory. 3 Years old I wil try it @ home with AMD64 3000+ Venice 10.4.3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donniedarko Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 2min 34 sec on celeron d 1 gig ram intel 915dgvl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e0feldgg Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 105 seconds. P4 (Prescott 630) 2.99 on AsRock 775 Dual with 1GB RAM, PATA drive 7200 rpm 120GB. Running CS2 on 10.4.3 (8F1111) at 1024x768 Millions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trailer Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 145 sec Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo M 1450G Computername: Apple Development Platform Computermodel: ADP2,1 Processortype: Intel® Pentium® M processor Number processors: 1 Processorspeed: 1.6 GHz L2-cache (per processor): 2 MB Processorkenmerken: FPU VME DE PSE TSC MSR PAE MCE CX8 APIC SEP MTRR PGE MCA CMOV PAT CLFSH DS ACPI MMX FXSR SSE SSE2 SS TM EST TM2 Memory: 512 MB Busspeed: 1.6 GHz Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900: Chipsetmodel: GMA 900 Type: VGA-compatibele controller Bus: Ingebouwd VRAM (totaal): 256 MB Vendor: Intel (0x8086) Deviceid: 0x2592 Revision-id: 0x0003 Display: Unknown display: Resolution: 1280 x 800 Depth: 32-bits color Core Image: Supported Main display: Yes Mirror: Off On line: Yes Quartz Extreme: Supported Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phun8890 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 (edited) Machine Name: Apple Development Platform Machine Model: ADP2,1 CPU Type: ADP2,1 <-- AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Venice E3 Number Of CPUs: 1 CPU Speed: 1.81 GHz L2 Cache (per CPU): 512 MB CPU Features: FPU VME DE PSE TSC MSR PAE MCE CX8 APIC SEP MTRR PGE MCA CMOV PAT PSE36 CLFSH MMX FXSR SSE SSE2 SSE3 Memory: 1 GB Bus Speed: 200 MHz Boot ROM Version: 6.00 PG (Phoenix Technologies, LTD) Graphics/Displays: Type: VGA-compatibele controller <-- NVIDIA Geforce 6600 GT Bus: PCI VRAM (total): 128 MB Vendor: nVIDIA (0x10de) Device ID: 0x0140 Revision ID: 0x00a2 Kernel Extension Info: No Kext Loaded Resolution: 1024 x 768 Depth: 32-bits color Core Image: Not Supported Main Display: Yes Mirror: Off Online: Yes Quartz Extreme: Not Supported I finished the radial blur effect for test.jpg in 2 minutes and 12 seconds on Photoshop CS2. I am currently running Mac OS X 10.4.3 (8F1111) on a Maxtor 6E040L0 40GB which is old and slow. Lifespan of this hard drive is 83%. If there will be an NVIDIA driver out of the Mac OS X86... I am sure my result will improve. I just did a XBench test for my hard drive and the end result is 17.2. That seem a bit low... is it? Edited December 6, 2005 by phun8890 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccihon Posted December 7, 2005 Share Posted December 7, 2005 My results: Work machine: Dual G5 1.8, Nvidia 5200, 1.25 Gigs Ram, 10.3.9, PS CS2 66.0 seconds PC Dell 4700 P4 530 3.0 HT, 1.5 Gigs Ram, Intel 915 PS CS2 WinXP 68.7 seconds Same Dell 4700 running OSX86 10.4.3 1099 native install, PS CS2 110.8 seconds I was surprised the single P4 kept pace with the dual G5 mac...but it looks like PPC apps take a 40% performance hit with rosetta emulation. I'm guessing other PS tests may show varying results, but these numbers come close to representing how these machines perform in real-world Photoshop work. I'm guessing rosetta-run PPC apps on anything 3.0 gigahertz and higher beat most any g4 mac and even some g5s running the same app. I'm going to see if I can get Strata running and do some tests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFMan Posted December 7, 2005 Share Posted December 7, 2005 I tested on my two OSX systems, both with CS2: Powerbook G4 1.33, 768 MB RAM 10.4.3: 146 seconds Intel P4 630 (3 GHz, 2MB Cache), Gigabyte GA-8I915ME-GL, 2GB RAM dual channel, 10.4.3 8F1099: 104 seconds The little Hackintosh isn't so bad after all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cipherworld Posted December 7, 2005 Author Share Posted December 7, 2005 59secs is BEST score I've seen so far. Can anyone else confirm is that because of a dual core P4 processor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdfs Posted December 7, 2005 Share Posted December 7, 2005 118 sec. using Photoshop CS (Version 8) on a native install (from marklar-tiger-release1.iso), 10.4.2 Exec-Patch, 10.4.3 Userland-Update and localisation update. My Hardware: Acer Travelmate 290 CPU: Pentium M 1.5 GHz Graphics: Intel 845 RAM: 512 MB CDFS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiDAN Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Machine Name: Apple Development Platform Machine Model: ADP2,1 CPU Type: Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor with Hyper-Threading Technology Number Of CPUs: 1 CPU Speed: 3.6 GHz L2 Cache (per CPU): 2 MB Hyper-Threading Technology: Enabled CPU Features: FPU VME DE PSE TSC MSR PAE MCE CX8 APIC SEP MTRR PGE MCA CMOV PAT PSE36 CLFSH DS ACPI MMX FXSR SSE SSE2 SS HTT TM SSE3 MON DSCPL EST TM2 CX16 TPR Memory: 1 GB Bus Speed: 800 MHz 80 seconds OSx86 8f1099 CS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cipherworld Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 Didan, Is that score from an Apple DTK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaxTrax! Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 53 Seconds: CS2 on 8F1111 Athlon X2 4400+ Dual Core (2x 2.2 GHz) :=) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ut2211 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 CPU Type: Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU SS3 Number Of CPUs: 1 CPU Speed: 3 GHz Memory: 1 GB GMA 900 1280x1024 Native install CS2 10.4.3 8F1099 108 sec. 10.4.3 8F1111 107 sec I've read 8F1111 was much better on Rosetta?!? No big difference! Very interesting the measure made by ccihon. It seems that executing a program under Rosetta gives you a 40% penalization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccihon Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 40% penalty was the difference for this particular Photoshop filter....some filters would show closer results, some a bigger gap. The dual-core machines are doing quite well, as would be expected with Photoshop, one of the few apps that can truly take advantage of it. The dual Athlon64 results beat my G5 1.8 dual....their extra speed was enough to overcome the rosetta emu penalty, here anyway. I do think this kind of test shows more accurately what to expect versus Xbench......for a comparison the G5 dual that did 66 sec on this test Xbenched LOWER than my OSX86 Dell P4 3.0.....? The DDR2 memory performance of the Dell is much higher than the mac, as are the graphics numbers...this is a surprise as the mac has an Nvidia 5200 card and the PC is Intel 900 graphics.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaxTrax! Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 I wouldn't mind seeing some results on the new G5 quad though :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cipherworld Posted December 9, 2005 Author Share Posted December 9, 2005 I wouldn't mind seeing some results on the new G5 quad though :-) Quad G5 took 17~19secs to finsih this test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts