Jump to content

[pre-release] macOS Ventura

fantomas

By fantomas,
in New Releases and Updates

 Share
3338 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Ellybz
Ellybz
Posted
Posted (edited)
On 7/22/2022 at 1:44 PM, Ellybz said:

@Extremeâ„¢

Bluetooth on m.2. adapter is only buggy if you use it to wake your system from sleep.  Thankfully I don't need it.

Also, I don't have another option, all my 44 PCIe lanes are maxed out. (GPU, TB, Audio card, Quad NVMe controller, USB PCie Hub.)

 

@surenmunoo@ricoc90@rafale77 and the others who chipped in.

 

Thanks for the input,

 

I thought Sidecar was the only feature limited to Igpu because of the T2 chip. 

I have not seen any infos limiting Universal control on MacPro7,1.  ( I've seen a couple of threads stating the opposite ). That is really a bummer. 😕

 

So to resume, I can Airplay between Ipad and Hack, use Airdrop, Handoff, Continuity, even the new feature using the camera from an IOS device in Hackintosh ( Facetime, whatsapp, etc..),

but I cannot use my keyboard & mouse between both?   What the 🤬 Apple?  

 

To be continued...

 

Just because I'm really stubborn, I kept looking for the solution with non IGPU systems and Universal Control and .......( Drum roll please )

IT IS NOW WORKING!!!! :hyper::yoji:

 

Solution was simple enough. Getting longer Wifi/Bluetooth antenna cables ( Shortening distance between  the BCM94360NG antennas and the IPad Pro ).

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08WZDS9XG?psc=1&ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_product_details

 

I can now use my mouse and keyboard ( even dragging files ) across the multiverse.  ( Also works in Monterey )

 

There you have it!! :thumbsup_anim:

 

 

image.png.8f93b6be4adc24784f792d5f04d68304.pngScreen Shot 2022-07-25 at 7.12.35 PM.png

Edited by Ellybz
  • Like 10
  • Thanks 1
deeveedee
deeveedee
Posted
Posted

@Ellybz Well done!  Those look to be 5dBi or better antennas.  That seems a bit extreme to fix the signal from your hack and what I suspect is a short distance to your iPad.  Is it possible that your original antennas or coax cables were bad?  One benefit is that you're now getting your recommended daily dose of RF.

  • Like 1
Ellybz
Ellybz
Posted
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, deeveedee said:

@Ellybz Well done!  Those look to be 5dBi or better antennas.  That seems a bit extreme to fix the signal from your hack and what I suspect is a short distance to your iPad.  Is it possible that your original antennas or coax cables were bad?  One benefit is that you're now getting your recommended daily dose of RF.

Standard 3dBi antennas that came with a WLAN PCIe card BCM94331 I bought four years ago ago on Ebay. Nothing fancy.

 

Despite changing cards BCM94331-> AX200-> BCM943360;  the BT reception was always mediocre at best, probably due to the positioning of the antennas ( Clustered in the back of my Hack, against a wall ).
Cables were examined and swapped, but no difference was noted...Until I gave the BT some Real Estates in top of the Hack, changing the cables to 50cm. That was it!

Distance between the antennas & IPad is now about 3.5 feet.

Edited by Ellybz
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
fuzzylogic
fuzzylogic
Posted
Posted

Was wondering if there was anything different about downloading beta 3 update? I installed beta 1 then update beta 2 but keep getting your mac is up to date, still on version beta 2. disk size is fine, installs one and update 2 went well wifi and bluetooth working

oc 83 and latest kext Lilu v1.6.2 whatever v 1.6.1 so latest beta 

uhd 630 internal igpu works fine

z390 asrock phantom gaming 9

odd that beta 2 went without any issues

deeveedee
deeveedee
Posted
Posted (edited)

@fuzzylogic - As eSAF said, Beta 3 should normally be available.  I reinstalled Ventura and Beta 3 multiple times during testing and I had only one instance where Beta 3 wasn't showing for me. I was certain that I hadn't changed my config.  I grew impatient (maybe it would have become available eventually if I had waited) and I "coaxed" the update by re-installing macOSDeveloperBetaAccessUtility.dmg.  This is the same utility you ran originally to enroll in the Ventura Beta program.  

 

When you re-install the utility, ignore any errors about not finding the requested update and allow the installation to finish.  If you are prompted to download the macOS installer, click "NO."   You should then see your hack checking for updates.  I hope this helps.

 

Edited by deeveedee
  • Like 3
aben
aben
Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, v-volodi said:

I upgrade and replace LCD display to full hd 1920 x 1080, and it works fine


Hello! Congrats and thanks for reporting on your success after replacing the 1600 x 900 panel to FHD. This further confirms my initial theory that KBL driver does not indeed support LVDS panels with native resolution of 1600 x 900 (HD+), at least on Ventura.

@PC IT There you have it! As advised the same, earlier on this thread here, the most straightforward and viable solution, at the moment, is to switch/upgrade your HD+ panel to FHD (1080p), if you wish to enjoy the flavors of Ventura on your Dell laptop, unfortunately. As stated earlier, finding a patch for this particular use-case is extremely challenging, code-wise, without immediate access to said hardware; the only other easier alternative being EDID patching which, again, is not exactly a practical approach since the overall scaling will end up being out of whack with degraded quality.

  • Like 2
aduket
aduket
Posted
Posted (edited)

Hi guys, I am occasionally checking this thread to figure out whether skylake based desktops (6700k for my case) are made compatible (including integrated cpu hd530) thanks to spoofing them as kabylake. Does it have any shortcomings after spoofing, if so what, or does it work perfectly as if apple supported it natively? can anybody give concise answer?

 

I see some posts who announce their success but I am still not sure. If compatibility of skylake isn't achieved I might update my system, which is very unlikely nowadays for me though. 

 

thanks in advance.

 

ps: I am using monterey now flawlessly . 

Edited by aduket
Slice
Slice
Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, aduket said:

Hi guys, I am occasionally checking this thread to figure out whether skylake based desktops (6700k for my case) are made compatible (including integrated cpu hd530) thanks to spoofing them as kabylake. Does it have any shortcomings after spoofing, if so what, or does it work perfectly as if apple supported it natively? can anybody give concise answer?

 

I see some posts who announce their success but I am still not sure. If compatibility of skylake isn't achieved I might update my system, which is very unlikely nowadays for me though. 

 

thanks in advance.

Sorry, my Skylake desktop has discrete graphics RX570. 

But I always had problems with HD530 (since High Sierra?). AFAIK it can't sleep-wake and sometimes randomly fall into the darkness. I prefer bugless discrete graphics.

  • Like 2
ichelash
ichelash
Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, aduket said:

Hi guys, I am occasionally checking this thread to figure out whether skylake based desktops (6700k for my case) are made compatible (including integrated cpu hd530) thanks to spoofing them as kabylake. Does it have any shortcomings after spoofing, if so what, or does it work perfectly as if apple supported it natively? can anybody give concise answer?

 

I see some posts who announce their success but I am still not sure. If compatibility of skylake isn't achieved I might update my system, which is very unlikely nowadays for me though. 

 

thanks in advance.

You need to use HDMI, DVI will not work if you are using it. Will send you my EFI when i get home.

  • Like 1
datafeedexpert
datafeedexpert
Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Rocky12 said:

iPadOS on Dell Optiplex 7050 MT 

8 GB ram 

Intel HD 530 

OpenCore 0.8.3

Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz 

 

no graphics acceleration very un unstable

Screenshot 2022-07-27 at 14.27.34.png

@Rocky12 Dell Optiplex 7050 MT (i5 6500T) 1xHDMI | 1xDP , Intel HD Graphics 530 Works with Monterey? I have a Problem with Display Connecter Patching , Have you last EFI for Previous mac OS Like - Catalina - Big Sur - Monterey ? if yes than can you please share your config.plist ?? 

  • Like 1
ichelash
ichelash
Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, aduket said:

Hi guys, I am occasionally checking this thread to figure out whether skylake based desktops (6700k for my case) are made compatible (including integrated cpu hd530) thanks to spoofing them as kabylake. Does it have any shortcomings after spoofing, if so what, or does it work perfectly as if apple supported it natively? can anybody give concise answer?

 

I see some posts who announce their success but I am still not sure. If compatibility of skylake isn't achieved I might update my system, which is very unlikely nowadays for me though. 

 

thanks in advance.

 

ps: I am using monterey now flawlessly . 

Try this.

EFI.zip

  • Like 2
Anto65
Anto65
Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, miliuco said:

 Do you have a bot monitoring Ventura betas? 😂

😆  No, but by now we know more or less the time from 19 to 19.30 ... and then I put my nephew to click "Check Updates" :hysterical:

 

However, here https://developer.apple.com/news/releases/  too take a look from time to time 😉

  • Like 2
  • Haha 4
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...