nmano Posted April 5, 2020 Author Share Posted April 5, 2020 (edited) XCPM Patches 10.15.4 Modify By N.Mano X99/X299 This is New Method. X99/X299 System If Add bootstrap patch You have to Add original CPUID like this. So Choose your bootstrap patch. Original CPUID FakeCPUID 0x0306F2 Haswell-E FakeCPUID 0x0406F1 Broadwell-E FakeCPUID 0x050654 Skylake-X FakeCPUID 0x050657 Cascade Lake-X Bios Setting C6/C7 State Support: EnabledCPU EIST Function: Enabled #1xcpm_core_scope_msrs © Pike R. Alpha Modify 10.15.4 N.Mano Comment String <-> xcpm_core_scope_msrs © Pike R. Alpha Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 31D2E857 D2FFFF MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 31D29090 909090 #2_xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Comment String <-> _xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 31D2E8E9 F9FEFF MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 31D29090 909090 #3 Comment String <-> _xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs #1 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> BE060000 005DE908 000000 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> BE060000 005DC390 909090 #4 Comment String <->_xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs_2 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 31D2E838 FDFFFF MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 31D29090 909090 #5 Comment String <->__xcpm_enable_pstate_patch (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 41C1E608 4963D689 D048C1EA 20 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 41C1E608 B800FF00 0031D290 90 #6This patch for X99(Haswell-E) Comment String <->xcpm_bootstrap HASwell-E (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 80C3C480 FB42 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 80C3C180 FB42 #7This patch for X299(Skylake-X/Cascade Lake-X) Comment String <->xcpm_bootstrap Skylake-X/Cascade Lake-X (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 80C3C480 FB42 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 80C3BD80 FB42 #8This patch for X99(Broadwell-E) Comment String <->xcpm_bootstrap Broadwell-E (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 80C3C480 FB42 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 80C3BC80 FB42 #9 Comment String <->_C6/C7_If=E2-Enabled=0x7E000403 Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> E2000000 4C000000 00000000 00000000 0F040000 00000000 0500001E MatchOS String <-> 10.12.x,10.13.x,10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> E2000000 4C000000 00000000 00000000 0F040000 00000000 0304007E #10 Comment String <->xcpm MSR Patch 4206 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 42060000 DC330600 00000000 00000000 1F000000 00000000 18000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 MatchOS String <->10.12.x,10.13.x,10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> 42060000 00000000 00000000 00000000 1F000000 00000000 18000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 #11 Comment String <->xcpm support /0x82D390/MSR_PP0_POLICY 0x63a (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 3A060000 DC330600 00000000 00000000 1F MatchOS String <->10.12.x,10.13.x,10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> 3A060000 00000000 00000000 00000000 1F #10 Disable panic kext logging on 10.15.4+ Release kernel Comment String <->Disable panic kext logging on @PMheart/Pike R. Alpha Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 8A0284C0 7447 MatchOS String <->10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> 8A0284C0 EB47 Edited April 5, 2020 by nmano 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlcdgd Posted April 5, 2020 Share Posted April 5, 2020 Thanks nmano, I will try with my 5960x. I still couldn’t found the perfect config that I have found for Mojave. Protools HDX is a very demanding configuration. For software coders: it will nice to have some kind of app able to generate the patches trogugh a kext like the brumbauer one. Thanks to everybody for the contributions hope you all are well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamhx Posted April 5, 2020 Share Posted April 5, 2020 3 hours ago, nmano said: XCPM Patches 10.15.4 Modify By N.Mano X99/X299 This is New Method. X99/X299 System If Add bootstrap patch You have to Add original CPUID like this. So Choose your bootstrap patch. Original CPUID FakeCPUID 0x0306F2 Haswell-E FakeCPUID 0x0406F1 Broadwell-E FakeCPUID 0x050654 Skylake-X FakeCPUID 0x050657 Cascade Lake-X Bios Setting C6/C7 State Support: EnabledCPU EIST Function: Enabled #1xcpm_core_scope_msrs © Pike R. Alpha Modify 10.15.4 N.Mano Comment String <-> xcpm_core_scope_msrs © Pike R. Alpha Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 31D2E857 D2FFFF MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 31D29090 909090 #2_xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Comment String <-> _xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 31D2E8E9 F9FEFF MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 31D29090 909090 #3 Comment String <-> _xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs #1 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> BE060000 005DE908 000000 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> BE060000 005DC390 909090 #4 Comment String <->_xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs_2 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 31D2E838 FDFFFF MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 31D29090 909090 #5 Comment String <->__xcpm_enable_pstate_patch (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 41C1E608 4963D689 D048C1EA 20 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 41C1E608 B800FF00 0031D290 90 #6This patch for X99(Haswell-E) Comment String <->xcpm_bootstrap HASwell-E (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 80C3C480 FB42 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 80C3C180 FB42 #7This patch for X299(Skylake-X/Cascade Lake-X) Comment String <->xcpm_bootstrap Skylake-X/Cascade Lake-X (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 80C3C480 FB42 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 80C3BD80 FB42 #8This patch for X99(Broadwell-E) Comment String <->xcpm_bootstrap Broadwell-E (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 80C3C480 FB42 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 80C3BC80 FB42 #9 Comment String <->_C6/C7_If=E2-Enabled=0x7E000403 Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> E2000000 4C000000 00000000 00000000 0F040000 00000000 0500001E MatchOS String <-> 10.12.x,10.13.x,10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> E2000000 4C000000 00000000 00000000 0F040000 00000000 0304007E #10 Comment String <->xcpm MSR Patch 4206 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 42060000 DC330600 00000000 00000000 1F000000 00000000 18000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 MatchOS String <->10.12.x,10.13.x,10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> 42060000 00000000 00000000 00000000 1F000000 00000000 18000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 #11 Comment String <->xcpm support /0x82D390/MSR_PP0_POLICY 0x63a (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 3A060000 DC330600 00000000 00000000 1F MatchOS String <->10.12.x,10.13.x,10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> 3A060000 00000000 00000000 00000000 1F #10 Disable panic kext logging on 10.15.4+ Release kernel Comment String <->Disable panic kext logging on @PMheart/Pike R. Alpha Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 8A0284C0 7447 MatchOS String <->10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> 8A0284C0 EB47 Hi nmano, I'm really appreciate your efforts! My desktop is: Gigabyte X99-Ultra Gaming + Intel i7-6850k, running on Catalina 10.15.4 (19E266). I tried your latest updates on 10.15.4. However, I cannot normally boot (stuck on +++) with all the 10 patches applied. So I tried to use only 4 below patches, and then successfully booted: #1xcpm_core_scope_msrs © Pike R. Alpha Modify 10.15.4 N.Mano #2_xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano _xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs #1 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano _xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs #2 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Also, I used back to the FakeID 040674. Below is the Geekbench results, from where you can see the score is quite low, 40% lower than my previous Mojave. Did I choose the wrong patches? Actually I tried to add the other 6 patches one by one, but none of these options can boot. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted April 5, 2020 Author Share Posted April 5, 2020 1 hour ago, williamhx said: Hi nmano, I'm really appreciate your efforts! My desktop is: Gigabyte X99-Ultra Gaming + Intel i7-6850k, running on Catalina 10.15.4 (19E266). I tried your latest updates on 10.15.4. However, I cannot normally boot (stuck on +++) with all the 10 patches applied. So I tried to use only 4 below patches, and then successfully booted: #1xcpm_core_scope_msrs © Pike R. Alpha Modify 10.15.4 N.Mano #2_xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano _xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs #1 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano _xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs #2 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Also, I used back to the FakeID 040674. Below is the Geekbench results, from where you can see the score is quite low, 40% lower than my previous Mojave. Did I choose the wrong patches? Actually I tried to add the other 6 patches one by one, but none of these options can boot. #test#test#test#test...... #BIOS SETTING #ORI CPUID #BOOTSTARP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamhx Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 8 hours ago, nmano said: #test#test#test#test...... #BIOS SETTING #ORI CPUID #BOOTSTARP Hi nmano, Here is my BIOS setting: BIOS Settings: Load the default values and change the outlined settingsM.I.TX.M.P = Profile 1 – Mhz depending on your CPU/MemoryAdvanced CPU Core SettingsIntel(R) Turbo Boos Max Technology 3.0 = Enable. (not available in i7 5820k)Hyper-Threading Technology = EnableCPU Enhanced Halt(C1E+ = EnableC3 State Support = EnableC6/C7 State Support = EnableCPU EIST Function = Enable (different than the guide as "Disabled" reduces cpu benchmark results after sleep)BIOSWindows 8/10 Features = Windows 8/10CSM Support = DisabledPeripheralsEHCI Hand-off = EnabledInter(R) Thunderbolt Support (option unavailable if no Thunderbolt AIC is installed)Inter(R) Thunderbolt Support = Disabled (currently it breaks sleep so I keep it at disabled)ChipsetXHCI Mode = Enabled And my CPU is i7-8560K. The ORI CPUID should be 0x0406F1, right? However, once I used this ID, the booting stuck again... The bootstrap patch also gives me high CPU freq keeping at 4.00GHz, no changing all the time. Thanks again~! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted April 6, 2020 Author Share Posted April 6, 2020 11 hours ago, williamhx said: Hi nmano, Here is my BIOS setting: BIOS Settings: Load the default values and change the outlined settingsM.I.TX.M.P = Profile 1 – Mhz depending on your CPU/MemoryAdvanced CPU Core SettingsIntel(R) Turbo Boos Max Technology 3.0 = Enable. (not available in i7 5820k)Hyper-Threading Technology = EnableCPU Enhanced Halt(C1E+ = EnableC3 State Support = EnableC6/C7 State Support = EnableCPU EIST Function = Enable (different than the guide as "Disabled" reduces cpu benchmark results after sleep)BIOSWindows 8/10 Features = Windows 8/10CSM Support = DisabledPeripheralsEHCI Hand-off = EnabledInter(R) Thunderbolt Support (option unavailable if no Thunderbolt AIC is installed)Inter(R) Thunderbolt Support = Disabled (currently it breaks sleep so I keep it at disabled)ChipsetXHCI Mode = Enabled And my CPU is i7-8560K. The ORI CPUID should be 0x0406F1, right? However, once I used this ID, the booting stuck again... The bootstrap patch also gives me high CPU freq keeping at 4.00GHz, no changing all the time. Thanks again~! Can you update your config,plest I will check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamhx Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 2 hours ago, nmano said: Can you update your config,plest I will check. Hi nmano, Here is my config.plist. BTW, I'm using clover revision 5108. Thanks! config.plist 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted April 6, 2020 Author Share Posted April 6, 2020 2 hours ago, williamhx said: Hi nmano, Here is my config.plist. BTW, I'm using clover revision 5108. Thanks! config.plist Try FakeCPUID 0x0406F1 You have to Enable this patches in config _xcpm_enable_pstate_patch xcpm_bootstrap Broadwell-E _C6/C7_If=E2-Enabled=0x7E000403 Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano xcpm MSR Patch 4206 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano xcpm support /0x82D390/MSR_PP0_POLICY 0x63a (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Just enable this 2 setting Bios Setting C6/C7 State Support: Enabled CPU EIST Function: Enabled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamhx Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 9 hours ago, nmano said: Try FakeCPUID 0x0406F1 You have to Enable this patches in config _xcpm_enable_pstate_patch xcpm_bootstrap Broadwell-E _C6/C7_If=E2-Enabled=0x7E000403 Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano xcpm MSR Patch 4206 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano xcpm support /0x82D390/MSR_PP0_POLICY 0x63a (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Just enable this 2 setting Bios Setting C6/C7 State Support: Enabled CPU EIST Function: Enabled Hi nmano, I tried with your guide, but unfortunately, stuck at +++ again. Actually I tried different combination by apply these 10 patches, but all failed if I use FakeCPUID as 0x0406F1. And what strange is, if I use 0x040674, I can boot successfully with patches #1#2#3#4 only. And if I use even 0x0306D4, I can boot with all patches applied but CPU always stay at 4.00GHz. I'm still using iMacPro1,1. Is that the problem? Do I need to change? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamhx Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 Sorry, my typo... My CPU is i7-6850K, Broadwell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucke Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 Is there a way to activate: "Core Req" in Intel power Gadget ...? in my case it is blocked at 25.50 ... !! ?? !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzmadd Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 (edited) Hi, any advice for running Intel Xeon E5 2600 family - Haswell on chinese motherboard? Should I just use the latest patches as presented by nmano according to CPU generation, platform and OS? Thanks a lot. Edited April 9, 2020 by zzmadd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamhx Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 On 4/7/2020 at 1:16 AM, nmano said: Try FakeCPUID 0x0406F1 You have to Enable this patches in config _xcpm_enable_pstate_patch xcpm_bootstrap Broadwell-E _C6/C7_If=E2-Enabled=0x7E000403 Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano xcpm MSR Patch 4206 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano xcpm support /0x82D390/MSR_PP0_POLICY 0x63a (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Just enable this 2 setting Bios Setting C6/C7 State Support: Enabled CPU EIST Function: Enabled Hi nmano, I'm here again to update my further trial. FakeID 0x0406F1 still cannot work for my i7-6850K + GA X99, stop at ++++. However, other FakeID (0x0306D4, 0x040674, and even 0x0306F2) all can work, but the CPU always stays > 2.0GHz, like below picture. Also, I cannot use the patch for bootstrap, no matter Haswell or Broadwell. Because once applied, my CPU keeps at 4.00GHz. Is it something related to my memory? Or, could you help to share your config.plist file? Thus I can do a thorough compare to see what's the problem. Thanks so much!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xiaovie Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 On 2020/4/10 at PM5点11分, williamhx said: 嗨nmano, 我再次在这里更新我的进一步试用版。 FakeID 0x0406F1仍然无法用于我的i7-6850K + GA X99,请在++++处停止。 但是,其他FakeID(0x0306D4、0x040674甚至0x0306F2)都可以工作,但是CPU始终保持> 2.0GHz,如下图所示。 另外,无论Haswell还是Broadwell,我都不能使用该补丁进行引导。因为一旦应用,我的CPU就保持在4.00GHz。 这和我的记忆有关吗? 或者,您可以帮助共享您的config.plist文件吗?因此,我可以进行彻底的比较以查看问题所在。 非常感谢!! me too,I installed 10.15.2, 10.15.3, 10.15.4, CPU 6800K keeps running at 3.6GHZ, I have rolled back 10.14.6, maybe you use ssdtPRGen.sh c to generate ssdt.aml can solve this problem,You can use my ssdt.aml, change ACPI> DropOEM check Change Acpi> SortedOrder and add "ssdt.aml", maybe it can solve the frequency conversion problem, please be sure to test 2020.4.15mojave10.14.6.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latze Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 On 4/4/2020 at 10:11 AM, nmano said: Hi @latze I test your patch but score is down. Your patch My patch Still I don't know which one is correct. I am waiting for @PMheart Thanks for your support. Hi @nmano but with my patch single score is better If you disassemble the kernel and search the sequence you'll see. To make sure we are on the same kernel my md5sum is bfa96eba22d16421f046d02f78f5afba /System/Library/Kernels/kernel On 4/5/2020 at 7:47 PM, nmano said: #test#test#test#test...... #BIOS SETTING #ORI CPUID #BOOTSTARP On 4/5/2020 at 5:50 PM, williamhx said: Hi nmano, I'm really appreciate your efforts! My desktop is: Gigabyte X99-Ultra Gaming + Intel i7-6850k, running on Catalina 10.15.4 (19E266). I tried your latest updates on 10.15.4. However, I cannot normally boot (stuck on +++) with all the 10 patches applied. So I tried to use only 4 below patches, and then successfully booted: #1xcpm_core_scope_msrs © Pike R. Alpha Modify 10.15.4 N.Mano #2_xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano _xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs #1 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano _xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs #2 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Also, I used back to the FakeID 040674. Below is the Geekbench results, from where you can see the score is quite low, 40% lower than my previous Mojave. Did I choose the wrong patches? Actually I tried to add the other 6 patches one by one, but none of these options can boot. You must include the performance patch, otherwise performance will be low. To get over the issues with stuck at ++++ ( which I experienced also ) you must include the long patches ( _C6/C7_If=E2-Enabled=0x7E000403 Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano xcpm MSR Patch 4206 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latze Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 On 4/8/2020 at 3:43 PM, lucke said: Is there a way to activate: "Core Req" in Intel power Gadget ...? in my case it is blocked at 25.50 ... !! ?? !! It is at 2550 because the performance patch ( 41C1E608 B800FF00 0031D290 90 ) sets it like that. See the FF in the code, that sets the frequency. To set it to your max frequency ( 4300 ) change it to 2B so the replace code will be 41C1E608 B8002B00 0031D290 90 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latze Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 On 4/16/2020 at 3:35 AM, xiaovie said: me too,I installed 10.15.2, 10.15.3, 10.15.4, CPU 6800K keeps running at 3.6GHZ, I have rolled back 10.14.6, maybe you use ssdtPRGen.sh c to generate ssdt.aml can solve this problem,You can use my ssdt.aml, change ACPI> DropOEM check Change Acpi> SortedOrder and add "ssdt.aml", maybe it can solve the frequency conversion problem, please be sure to test 2020.4.15mojave10.14.6.zip You don't need ssdt.aml, just enable PluginType in clover. You must be sure you select the correct patches, for 10.15.X they changed from version to version, and include all of them. I attached my config for example, I am on Haswell-E, i7 5820k, MSR unlocked config-example.plist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamhx Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 1 hour ago, latze said: Hi @nmano but with my patch single score is better If you disassemble the kernel and search the sequence you'll see. To make sure we are on the same kernel my md5sum is bfa96eba22d16421f046d02f78f5afba /System/Library/Kernels/kernel You must include the performance patch, otherwise performance will be low. To get over the issues with stuck at ++++ ( which I experienced also ) you must include the long patches ( _C6/C7_If=E2-Enabled=0x7E000403 Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano xcpm MSR Patch 4206 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano ) Hi latze, I did use those patches. But i still got +++ if i use the fakeCPUID 0406F1 on my i7-6850k. Also, when I used the xcpm_bootstrap patch, my CPU just keeps at highest 4.00GHz, no changing at all. Any advices are appreciated. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latze Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 11 minutes ago, williamhx said: Hi latze, I did use those patches. But i still got +++ if i use the fakeCPUID 0406F1 on my i7-6850k. Also, when I used the xcpm_bootstrap patch, my CPU just keeps at highest 4.00GHz, no changing at all. Any advices are appreciated. Thanks! Try the following for bootstrap: Find: 80C3C480 FB420F Replace: 80C3BC80 FB420F Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamhx Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 50 minutes ago, latze said: Try the following for bootstrap: Find: 80C3C480 FB420F Replace: 80C3BC80 FB420F Thanks latze again! I tried this one, but no lucky... still keeps as high as 4.0GHz... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latze Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 4 minutes ago, williamhx said: Thanks latze again! I tried this one, but no lucky... still keeps as high as 4.0GHz... And utilization in Intel Power Gadget shows 100% ? Do you have the CPU type set to 0x0706 in Clover? What product name are you using in SMBIOS section? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamhx Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 10 minutes ago, latze said: And utilization in Intel Power Gadget shows 100% ? Do you have the CPU type set to 0x0706 in Clover? What product name are you using in SMBIOS section? yes, the Intel Power Gadget shows 100% My CPU type was set to 0706 already. in SMBIOS, i tried both iMacPro1,1 and MacPro7,1. They all failed... And back to the problem of stuck at +++ when using fakeCPUID 0406F1, you suggested to use "patches ( _C6/C7_If=E2-Enabled=0x7E000403 Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano". But looks like my original E2 shows as below, not 7E000403. Is that the reason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latze Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 1 hour ago, williamhx said: yes, the Intel Power Gadget shows 100% My CPU type was set to 0706 already. in SMBIOS, i tried both iMacPro1,1 and MacPro7,1. They all failed... And back to the problem of stuck at +++ when using fakeCPUID 0406F1, you suggested to use "patches ( _C6/C7_If=E2-Enabled=0x7E000403 Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano". But looks like my original E2 shows as below, not 7E000403. Is that the reason? I use iMacPro1,1 disable bootstrap patch and use 0x040674 for fakeCPUID . Disable all other patches and leave only the performance one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamhx Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 59 minutes ago, latze said: I use iMacPro1,1 disable bootstrap patch and use 0x040674 for fakeCPUID . Disable all other patches and leave only the performance one. I tried as you suggested, disable all patches (such as core_scope, pkg_scope, etc.). But stuck at +++ again... Do I need at least smt_msrs patches? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latze Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 30 minutes ago, williamhx said: I tried as you suggested, disable all patches (such as core_scope, pkg_scope, etc.). But stuck at +++ again... Do I need at least smt_msrs patches? Yes, now enable them one by one, boot and see what happens. You changed the fakeCPUID to 0x040674 also right? I suggest you start with the one that starts with 42060000 DC330600 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts