jrv10 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 1 hour ago, latze said: If you are seeing 25.50 at Core Req you are using the right one it wouldn't reach that level otherwise. To see your actual Max Freq there which from the pic seem to be 3.8GHz you need to change the replace string to C1E308B8 00260000 31D29090 ( 26 instead of FF => 26 in HEX is 38 ) But I recommend you to try my other method that I just posted instead of performance patch. Thank you latze, I am learning how PM works on X99. It is very interesting. I will try your method with CPUFriend and see what results I get. Are both kexts generic or specific to your CPU? My CPU is a Xeon E5 1680 V3 Haswell Could I use them directly in combination with Lilu Kext? Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latze Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 9 minutes ago, jrv10 said: Thank you latze, I am learning how PM works on X99. It is very interesting. I will try your method with CPUFriend and see what results I get. Are both kexts generic or specific to your CPU? My CPU is a Xeon E5 1680 V3 Haswell Could I use them directly in combination with Lilu Kext? Thank you. Kexts will work on any CPU, but I don't know how well depending on the model, hence the testing Yes, you can use them in combination with any other kexts, just place them in clover kexts/Other Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yapan4 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 (edited) On 5/12/2020 at 2:16 PM, laudou said: Hi I am wondering how you can add the kernel patches to opencore config.plist. Can you help me, please? Thanks Hi, @laudou Sorry. I don't use Open Core. But some kernel patches that i used in Clover was firstly realised in Open Core and then transmited in to Clover(kernel patch for locked 0x1AA). Also Open Core has built-in solution for locked 0xE2 MSR, so both this patches have built-in realisation in Open Core and just need be enabled in OC config.plist/kernel/Quirks Edited May 13, 2020 by yapan4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laudou Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 On 9/25/2018 at 10:51 AM, nmano said: Thanks a lot for you kind reply. I'll see what I can do from now on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted May 14, 2020 Author Share Posted May 14, 2020 XCPM Patches 10.15.5 Beta Modify By N.Mano X99/X299 This is New Method. X99/X299 System If Add bootstrap patch You have to Add original CPUID like this. Original CPUID FakeCPUID 0x0306F2 Haswell-E FakeCPUID 0x0406F1 Broadwell-E FakeCPUID 0x050654 Skylake-X FakeCPUID 0x050657 Cascade Lake-X I don't see any difference 10.15.4 and 10.15.5 beta please test this patches for 10.15.5 too. Thanks for your support. sysctl -x hw.cpufamily sysctl -x machdep.cpu.model sysctl -x machdep.xcpm.forced_idle_period sysctl -x machdep.xcpm.forced_idle_ratio sysctl -x machdep.xcpm.mode sysctl -x machdep.cpu.features sysctl -x hw.cputype #1 xcpm_core_scope_msrs © Pike R. Alpha Modify 10.15.5 N.Mano Comment String <-> xcpm_core_scope_msrs © Pike R. Alpha Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 31D2E857 D2FFFF MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 31D29090 909090 #2 _xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Comment String <-> _xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 31D2E8E9 F9FEFF MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 31D29090 909090 #3 Comment String <-> _xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs #1 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> BE060000 005DE908 000000 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> BE060000 005DC390 909090 #4 Comment String <->_xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs_2 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 31D2E838 FDFFFF MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 31D29090 909090 #5 Comment String <->__xcpm_enable_pstate_patch (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 41C1E608 4963D689 D048C1EA 20 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 41C1E608 B800FF00 0031D290 90 #6 This patch for X99(Haswell-E) Comment String <->xcpm_bootstrap HASwell-E (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 80C3C480 FB42 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 80C3C180 FB42 #7 This patch for X299(Skylake-X/Cascade Lake-X) Comment String <->xcpm_bootstrap Skylake-X/Cascade Lake-X (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 80C3C480 FB42 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 80C3BD80 FB42 #8 This patch for X99(Broadwell-E) Comment String <->xcpm_bootstrap Broadwell-E (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 80C3C480 FB42 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 80C3BC80 FB42 #9 This patch for IvyBridge Base: _xcpm_bootstrap Comment: xcpm_bootstrap IvyBridge (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Count: 0 Enabled: YES Find: 80C3C480 FB42 Identifier: kernel Limit: 0 Mask: (LEAVE THIS EMPTY) MatchKernel: Replace: 80C3C680 FB42 ReplaceMask: (LEAVE THIS EMPTY) Skip: 0 #10 Comment String <->_C6/C7_If=E2-Enabled=0x7E000403 Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> E2000000 4C000000 00000000 00000000 0F040000 00000000 0500001E MatchOS String <-> 10.12.x,10.13.x,10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> E2000000 4C000000 00000000 00000000 0F040000 00000000 0304007E #11 Comment String <->xcpm MSR Patch 4206 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 42060000 DC330600 00000000 00000000 1F000000 00000000 18000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 MatchOS String <->10.12.x,10.13.x,10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> 42060000 00000000 00000000 00000000 1F000000 00000000 18000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 #12 Comment String <->xcpm support /0x82D390/MSR_PP0_POLICY 0x63a (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 3A060000 DC330600 00000000 00000000 1F MatchOS String <->10.12.x,10.13.x,10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> 3A060000 00000000 00000000 00000000 1F #13 Disable panic kext logging on 10.15.5+ Modify By N.Mano Comment String <->Disable panic kext logging on @PMheart/Pike R. Alpha Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 8A0284C0 7447 MatchOS String <->10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> 8A0284C0 EB47 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olmirror Posted May 19, 2020 Share Posted May 19, 2020 Hi, I've just migrated to OC from Clover and have everything up and running (x99 UD4, 5820k @ 4300, Vega64), but am having the same issue as some of the other people on this thread. In order to get full performance I need to have the PMDrvr.kext installed. I've tried pretty much everything from all over the forums. I even have CPUfriend installed, patched and made all the necessary ssdt's but the scores stay the same, about 30% lower with the kext. What am I missing in order to get the same performance without this kext? - any suggestions? All related pm plugins are loading correctly through quirk AppleXcpmExtraMsrs and the corresponding kexts and ssdt's. Anyone is welcome to use this OC setup for their GA-UD4-X99 board. Don't forget to generate a proper System Serial Number in PlatformInfo. Everything appears to work properly in Mojave as well as Catalina. EFI.zip Another question I have is that through all the different configurations that I tried multiple cpu entries for the same cpu, 4 to be exact, have appeared in my ioreg. Is there any way that I can delete these, or is this something that I shouldn't worry about? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted May 19, 2020 Share Posted May 19, 2020 39 minutes ago, olmirror said: Hi, I've just migrated to OC from Clover and have everything up and running (x99 UD4, 5820k @ 4300, Vega64), but am having the same issue as some of the other people on this thread. In order to get full performance I need to have the PMDrvr.kext installed. I've tried pretty much everything from all over the forums. I even have CPUfriend installed, patched and made all the necessary ssdt's but the scores stay the same, about 30% lower with the kext. What am I missing in order to get the same performance without this kext? - any suggestions? All related pm plugins are loading correctly through quirk AppleXcpmExtraMsrs and the corresponding kexts and ssdt's. Anyone is welcome to use this OC setup for their GA-UD4-X99 board. Don't forget to generate a proper System Serial Number in PlatformInfo. Everything appears to work properly in Mojave as well as Catalina. EFI.zip Another question I have is that through all the different configurations that I tried multiple cpu entries for the same cpu, 4 to be exact, have appeared in my ioreg. Is there any way that I can delete these, or is this something that I shouldn't worry about? Thanks! Try this option. 4 CPU is ok EFI.zip 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olmirror Posted May 19, 2020 Share Posted May 19, 2020 3 hours ago, pitrysha said: Try this option. 4 CPU is ok EFI.zip Cool. Thanks, will do! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olmirror Posted May 19, 2020 Share Posted May 19, 2020 4 hours ago, pitrysha said: Try this option. 4 CPU is ok EFI.zip Tried your files out. The ssdt-EC is not recognized and I had to disable AppleCPUPMCfglock as it disabled my c3 states and fully functioning PM. But either way, it still kept my benchmarks as they were. It's as if the OS is not recognizing the overclock. It gives scores as if the cpu is running at stock speeds. PMDrvr pushes all the cores to max turbospeeds when the cpu is rendering, but I can't get this result without it. But at least the temps are where they are supposed to be instead of constantly fluctuating between 40 and 60 when the computer is idle. thanks for the input pitrysha. On a side note, did you have any difficulties getting your xeon to run on opencore? I'm thing of picking up a 2697 v3. My last effort with a xeon 2690v3 on Clover didn't get me anywhere and had to send it back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 10 hours ago, olmirror said: Tried your files out. The ssdt-EC is not recognized and I had to disable AppleCPUPMCfglock as it disabled my c3 states and fully functioning PM. But either way, it still kept my benchmarks as they were. It's as if the OS is not recognizing the overclock. It gives scores as if the cpu is running at stock speeds. PMDrvr pushes all the cores to max turbospeeds when the cpu is rendering, but I can't get this result without it. But at least the temps are where they are supposed to be instead of constantly fluctuating between 40 and 60 when the computer is idle. thanks for the input pitrysha. On a side note, did you have any difficulties getting your xeon to run on opencore? I'm thing of picking up a 2697 v3. My last effort with a xeon 2690v3 on Clover didn't get me anywhere and had to send it back. I have no problem with Xeon . Here I look at many with your processors that something is wrong . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olmirror Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 4 hours ago, pitrysha said: I have no problem with Xeon . Here I look at many with your processors that something is wrong . yeah, hackintoshes with xeon are usually not overclocked so everything works as it should. It's the ones that overclock that have problems getting their speeds to be recognized by the os. I wonder what we can do? You think implementing the performance patch in OC would make a difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 42 minutes ago, olmirror said: yeah, hackintoshes with xeon are usually not overclocked so everything works as it should. It's the ones that overclock that have problems getting their speeds to be recognized by the os. I wonder what we can do? You think implementing the performance patch in OC would make a difference? If you read the Open Core thread starting from page 90-100, they discussed these problems there and sort of solved them, that is, everything should work for you without XСPM patches, as I understand it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olmirror Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, pitrysha said: If you read the Open Core thread starting from page 90-100, they discussed these problems there and sort of solved them, that is, everything should work for you without XСPM patches, as I understand it. True, xcpm works in OC without the patches. What I am looking for though, is for a way to have the OS read an overclocked CPU (-maybe it's just an issue with Haswell-E?). I just did a benchmark at stock specs (3,4Ghz) and effectively, the scores are identical to my systems benchmarks running at 4,3Ghz. I remember there being an XCPM Performance fix that was implemented earlier on (High Sierra?) and was wondering whether a patch in that direction could help us on our way to getting our systems running at its full potential. So far I have tried pretty much everything I found around the net, including diabling eist, installing and configuring cpufriend, ssdt's but nothing has helped up to this point. Except for PMDvr.kext that is. But I don't like how that affects my wildly fluctuating temps. Edited May 20, 2020 by olmirror Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 15 minutes ago, olmirror said: True, xcpm works in OC without the patches. What I am looking for though, is for a way to have the OS read an overclocked CPU (-maybe it's just an issue with Haswell-E?). I just did a benchmark at stock specs (3,4Ghz) and effectively, the scores are identical to my systems benchmarks running at 4,3Ghz. I remember there being an XCPM Performance fix that was implemented earlier on (High Sierra?) and was wondering whether a patch in that direction could help us on our way to getting our systems running at its full potential. So far I have tried pretty much everything I found around the net, including diabling eist, cpu friend, ssdt's but nothing has helped up to this point. Except for PMDvr.kext that is. But I don't like how that affect my wildly fluctuating temps. And through the BIOS, what does not suit overclocking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olmirror Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, pitrysha said: And through the BIOS, what does not suit overclocking? Thanks Pitrysha, are you suggesting that I need to look at the settings in my bios? It's a gigabyte mobo, -any suggestions as to what settings I could try? I ticked the automatic overclock to 4,3... Edited May 20, 2020 by olmirror 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 26 minutes ago, olmirror said: Thanks Pitrysha, are you suggesting that I need to look at the settings in my bios? It's a gigabyte mobo, -any suggestions as to what settings I could try? I ticked the automatic overclock to 4,3... For example . https://nickwoodhams.com/x99-overclock-settings/ EFI.zip 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olmirror Posted May 21, 2020 Share Posted May 21, 2020 15 hours ago, pitrysha said: For example . https://nickwoodhams.com/x99-overclock-settings/ EFI.zip Thanks pitrysha. went through the guides, tried your files, same results. Maybe I should simply admit defeat and use the pmdrvr.kext when I need my system to run at full performance... Strange though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted May 21, 2020 Share Posted May 21, 2020 1 hour ago, olmirror said: Thanks pitrysha. went through the guides, tried your files, same results. Maybe I should simply admit defeat and use the pmdrvr.kext when I need my system to run at full performance... Strange though. PMDrvr.kext is not recommended. CPUFriend.kext + CPUFriendDataProvider.kext try this option. Set the maximum factor in the BIOS. If it does not work out, then I have no more options. Архив.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olmirror Posted May 21, 2020 Share Posted May 21, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, pitrysha said: PMDrvr.kext is not recommended. CPUFriend.kext + CPUFriendDataProvider.kext try this option. Set the maximum factor in the BIOS. If it does not work out, then I have no more options. Архив.zip Seriously appreciate your effort! Remains one final question, do I need to paste the included plists into X86PlatformPlugin.kext? Edited May 21, 2020 by olmirror Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted May 21, 2020 Share Posted May 21, 2020 11 minutes ago, olmirror said: Seriously appreciate your effort! Remains one final question, do I need to paste the included plists into X86PlatformPlugin.kext? Ready-made kexts with frequency characteristics. But you can make your own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olmirror Posted May 21, 2020 Share Posted May 21, 2020 (edited) 57 minutes ago, pitrysha said: Ready-made kexts with frequency characteristics. But you can make your own. Thanks, tried and didn't get anywhere. I'm throwing in the towel. Thanks for all your efforts! I think I'm going to pick up a used 2697 v3 which will keep me from overclocking. My latest attempt at installing a xeon brought me no further than a hang at pci configuration begin. This was on clover with the pci patch from Brumbaer implemented. Do you have any of those patches running on your setup or will ticking IncreasePciBarSize do the trick on OC? Edited May 21, 2020 by olmirror Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted May 21, 2020 Share Posted May 21, 2020 13 minutes ago, olmirror said: Thanks, tried and didn't get anywhere. I'm throwing in the towel. Thanks for all your efforts! I think I'm going to pick up a used 2697 v3 which will keep me from overclocking. My latest attempt at installing a xeon brought me no further than a hang at pci configuration begin. This was on clover with the pci patch from Brumbaer implemented. Do you have any of those patches running on your setup or will ticking IncreasePciBarSize do the trick on OC? Here is my plist config.plist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olmirror Posted May 21, 2020 Share Posted May 21, 2020 29 minutes ago, pitrysha said: Here is my plist config.plist sweet. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mxiris Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 Hello N.Mano, The official version of 10.15.5 has been released, the kernel patch has been invalidated, I hope you can take the time to update it, thank you very much. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted May 29, 2020 Author Share Posted May 29, 2020 XCPM 10.15.5 for X99/X299 Apple update bootstrap to 10.15.5 Now old method.please update FakeID in your config. X99/X299 System If Add bootstrap patch You have to Add original CPUID like this. FakeCPUID Original CPUID 0x0306C3 0x0306F2 Haswell-E 0x0306D4 0x0406F1 Broadwell-E 0x0406E3 0x050654 Skylake-X 0x0406E3 0x050657 Cascade Lake-X #1xcpm_core_scope_msrs © Pike R. Alpha Modify 10.15.5 N.Mano Comment String <-> xcpm_core_scope_msrs © Pike R. Alpha Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 31D2E857 D2FFFF MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 31D29090 909090 #2_xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Comment String <-> _xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 31D2E8E9 F9FEFF MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 31D29090 909090 #3 Comment String <-> _xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs #1 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> BE060000 005DE908 000000 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> BE060000 005DC390 909090 #4 Comment String <->_xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs_2 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 31D2E838 FDFFFF MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 31D29090 909090 #5 Comment String <->__xcpm_enable_pstate_patch (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 41C1E608 4963D689 D048C1EA 20 MatchOS String <-> 10.15.x Replace Data<-> 41C1E608 B800FF00 0031D290 90 #6 Comment String <->_C6/C7_If=E2-Enabled=0x7E000403 Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> E2000000 4C000000 00000000 00000000 0F040000 00000000 0500001E MatchOS String <-> 10.12.x,10.13.x,10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> E2000000 4C000000 00000000 00000000 0F040000 00000000 0304007E #7 Comment String <->xcpm MSR Patch 4206 (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 42060000 DC330600 00000000 00000000 1F000000 00000000 18000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 MatchOS String <->10.12.x,10.13.x,10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> 42060000 00000000 00000000 00000000 1F000000 00000000 18000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 #8 Comment String <->xcpm support /0x82D390/MSR_PP0_POLICY 0x63a (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N.Mano Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 3A060000 DC330600 00000000 00000000 1F MatchOS String <->10.12.x,10.13.x,10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> 3A060000 00000000 00000000 00000000 1F #9 Disable panic kext logging on 10.15.5+ Release kernel Comment String <->Disable panic kext logging on @PMheart/Pike R. Alpha Disabled Boolean <-> No Find Data<-> 8A0284C0 7447 MatchOS String <->10.14.x,10.15.x Replace Data<-> 8A0284C0 EB47 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts