xtraa Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 (don't PM me for the link, just search there for JaS and you will find it!): No, we won't Any keyword hints? JaS did not upped anything ppf-like on demonoid by now. Who is the seeder? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melkuniels Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Is it for AMD of intell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asapreta Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Same here. This are supposed to be the checksums for ISO: MD5=a1960475511ffb5ecc7447ac7d71d44c SHA1= e5217b9e447624d607fce46375366ffa0bcea368 It´s the TORRENT HASH, not the ISO HASH. The torrent has one more file. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
subtext1 Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 search "10.4.8 JaS" - this is not about a ppf, it´s a reseed of the complete and correct ISO. No, we won't Any keyword hints? JaS did not upped anything ppf-like on demonoid by now. Who is the seeder? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@ppl3ju1ce Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Can some do a tutorial for the GMA 950 kernel delete and copy back the GMA 900? I don´t get this right... And should i install the semthex or mifki SSE3 Patch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtraa Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 search "10.4.8 JaS" - this is not about a ppf, it´s a reseed of the complete and correct ISO. Ah ok I misunderstood Yes I am already leeching @ 40%. Is it for AMD of intell? It is for intel, but in order to apply the upcoming ppf patches for AmD, you'll need this torrent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuXb Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 files details 517355 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melkuniels Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 which torrent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mathdude1284 Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Finished and seeding... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nastyhome Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Is this the right? File hash: 1d7059ae05cb9afc045240126636162aafddca2ba0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
re-book Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Torrents use hashchecking, so this should not be problem. If it were so easy to corrupt torrents, the RIAA and MPAA would be doing it constantly and the torrent system would not work at all. I do not know what happened with the first JaS 10.4.8 seed, but I am still not convinced it was in fact corrupted by RatioMaster (or whatever) either. [sorry, Jas]. I don't think that is impossible. You can get the source-code of azureus at sourceforge. I think with a lot work that should be possible to have a client that sends packages looking the same but contain somethings else. But the result of this would be that you receive waste and not a 80% working DVD. How I understood JaS, this release was not for the public - only for some early testers. But someone brought it to public. So it was a early shot and we wasted some time and bandwidth - never mind. JaS makes a great job and that should be the thing we keep in mind. re-book Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
figgy Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 at 2.1% azureus is reporting my hash as 1D7059AE05CB9AFC045240126636162AAFDDCA2B does this mean i have bad data Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mathdude1284 Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Theres a difference between the TORRENT hash and the ISO hash. Torrent hash from uTorrent: 9B91456DCFEF6DEF3E096A440DF0A2C8F507A11 Patched iso's MD5= a1960475511ffb5ecc7447ac7d71d44c Patched iso's SHA1= e5217b9e447624d607fce46375366ffa0bcea368 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nastyhome Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Theres a difference between the TORRENT hash and the ISO hash. Torrent hash from uTorrent: 9B91456DCFEF6DEF3E096A440DF0A2C8F507A11 Patched iso's MD5= a1960475511ffb5ecc7447ac7d71d44c Patched iso's SHA1= e5217b9e447624d607fce46375366ffa0bcea368 Yeah now I got one with: Torrent hash from uTorrent: 9B91456DCFEF6DEF3E096A440DF0A2C8F507A11 Hope that is correct! files details 517355 Yep I am on 517355 Reports: Torrent hash from uTorrent: 9B91456DCFEF6DEF3E096A440DF0A2C8F507A11 Anyone else can confirm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mathdude1284 Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 For some reason theres another release on demonoid...517846...fake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tripleboot Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 For some reason theres another release on demonoid...517846...fake? Two files posted today. One is listed in Dutch the other in English Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtraa Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 mathdude1284. now that you are ready with dl, could you check if the md5 hash is ok? to do so, just fire up the terminal and type md5 (then drag your file here with the mouse) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuXb Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 wow - both kernels run on my laptop - Semthex' Kernel scrores at an average of XBench 99 and Mifki's between 102 and 105 - before I had 65-67 :-) (without QE/ CI I have to admit). Pretty darn cool, ain't it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clonk Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 For some reason theres another release on demonoid...517846...fake? Hmm, it may be the first iso, at least the torrent comment seems similar. Interresting times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmoski Posted November 3, 2006 Author Share Posted November 3, 2006 Does that mean that after removing the 950 kexts, that QE/CI will work for the 900s? Yes, this is exactly what it means. Enjoy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@ppl3ju1ce Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Has somebody a ATI X1900XTX running with this build? I had very big problems on the others build with the card. Or for what is the installationpoint "10.4.8.ATi.Radeon.1x00.pcie.support"? And how can i solve the problem with the GMA900 Support? I´m totally new to this, so please do a easy tutorial oder anything like that And whats the difference between GMA900 and GMA950? EDIT: OK now i know what GMA is, its the graphic unit onboard. But which should i install now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiceTea Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Same here until I reconfigured my router, firewall, and Azureus settings. The NAT/Firewall test by Azureus is now OK, and "health" icons show up nice and green. Download speeds improved considerably. But I get refused by most peers, so my dl rate is 4/5kb/sec, while I upload at 50k..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mathdude1284 Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 mathdude1284. now that you are ready with dl, could you check if the md5 hash is ok? to do so, just fire up the terminal and type md5 (then drag your file here with the mouse) I just checked the iso and the md5 checksum is identical to the one in the first post. So all is ok for my copy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mihec Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Hi guys. Please send me an invit. for Oink. Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaS Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Torrents use hashchecking, so this should not be problem. If it were so easy to corrupt torrents, the RIAA and MPAA would be doing it constantly and the torrent system would not work at all. I do not know what happened with the first JaS 10.4.8 seed, but I am still not convinced it was in fact corrupted by RatioMaster (or whatever) either. [sorry, Jas]. If we can get osx running on a pc , someone can corrupt a seed.Nothing is impossible. Thats like ppl saying , I am not convinced they have the new kernel running LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts