Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Allan

      Forum Rules   04/13/2018

      Hello folks! As some things are being fixed, we'll keep you updated. Per hour the Forum Rules don't have a dedicated "Tab", so here is the place that we have our Rules back. New Users Lounge > [READ] - InsanelyMac Forum Rules - The InsanelyMac Staff Team. 
Acro_Design

does anyone like gnome shell/ eg gnome 3

19 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

i have tried gnome 3 and i have to say i think it is the single most beautiful simple interface that does away with menus and adds some really graphical functionality. and i hope that mac will start to use the dashboard in the same way, the only reason i do not use it at present is i have windows programs that are no good with wine or crossover namely the cs5 stuff. its a shame that gnome shell itsnt developed to cross over.

 

so does anyone else like gnome shell? i would love to see a very similar if not rip off in osx one day

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like gnome, but it is to much for my older PIII laptop, so I use openbox. But Gnome is my preferred Desktop Manager.

 

Gnome has nothing to do with WINE or CrossOver. They are completely separate projects.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah i know, i meant that i do not use ubuntu or any other distro because i need sertain windows based programs and dislike the functionality of the alternatives, but that was off topic so my fault for the miss understanding. however im talking about gnome shell / gnome 3 gui its like if windows and mac had a baby

 

google gnome shell. i realise the way it works is no different to gnome currently but its so much nicer then unity and really is nice to use.

 

http://fedoraproject.org/

 

fedora use gnome shell too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still on Ubuntu 10.04 and made gnome look alike OSX Snow Leo. I'm also running Dreamweaver, Photoshop, Wolfenstein, Tomb Raider and more with Wine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried out debian wheezy recently and it used gnome 3.2. I liked it. I had to tweak it of course a bit to get it just so, but isn't that true of all desktop environments. In fact, if I hadn't finally figured out how to get snow leopard on my old laptop I'd be using it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think gnome shell is amazing. I could understand power users not liking it but for laptops as such i find it perfect, so quick.

 

Also for anyone who doesn't know about it check out the gnomeshellextensions web page - makes customising it so much easier.|

 

Also there's an OS X style theme on gnomelooks which spices it up a bit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For laptops,its very nice.But as i consider myself a poweruser and used to the old ways of doing things,i must say i can't live with it.Btw,i got used to Win7->Win8 transition though..And might i add,since i see someone up top mentioned Ubuntu,Unity is the worst thing that ever happened for a GUI lol.Running Debian stable currently,still with the old Gnome.Good to know someone picked up where Gnome team left off... MATE Desktop :wink2:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just read the SolusOS 1 is now released. It uses Gnome for its desktop and is based on Debian Stable.

 

When I find some time, I'll give Solus a try and let you know what I think.

 

fos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was more dual-monitor friendly it could have been perfect. But then the same applies to ML/Lion. No real control over dual-monitor (and multi-workspace) setups really lets both the OS's down from a power user side. But I stand by what I said earlier; for laptops / casual use gome 3 is awesome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just intalled  gnome-3 on my free-bsd build(had to manually compile it) works nice though.

it seems that some distros are taking time to build packages for new gui's..bsd is one of those..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just had to log back in (been a while) to say that I love Gnome-shell 3.10 and all the new core apps ^_^, I prefer to use a few extentions to make it more usefull such as and I recomend dash to dock, because I would rather have a dock that sits on my desktop and only needs one click to get to it.

 

ps. for docky and plank fans.

I have worked out a way to make the dash launch from docky / plank and this seems to be a lot like launch pad, it uses the super key bound to a .desktop file. I dont use this method anymore as I am used to Gnome Shell 3.10, but it might make OsX fans a bit happier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ the right hardware hmmm... not really

 

personally i think gnome 3 is visually stunning , but the amount of resources it use up are quite a lot compared to other DE ( something like XFCE , LXDE, or the good ol' gnome 2 )  , not to mention the amount of dependencies it needs,  and the amount of time it takes to be compiled if by chance you are using a source-based linux distribution like i do.

 

but who am i to judge, it's a matter of taste anyway.

as a power user i prefer some dynamic lightweight window manager like awesome or bspwm. Both are certainly customizable , keyboard-driven , dual monitor friendly , and certainly a lot lighter than gnome, good news is awesome can be used in conjuntion to gnome shell as well)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    •   Boot option name retrieval To retrieve the boot option name: 1) Locate the booter image as explained blow. 2) Locate ".contentDetails" in the parent folder 2.1) if unsuccessful, locate ".disk_label.contentDetails" in the parent folder 2.2) if unsuccessful, retrieve the volume's name   HFS Boot 1) Retrieve blessed file via https://github.com/CupertinoNet/EfiPkg/blob/development/Include/Guid/AppleBless.h#L41 1.1) if unsuccessful, retrieve blessed folder via https://github.com/CupertinoNet/EfiPkg/blob/development/Include/Guid/AppleBless.h#L45, append "\\boot.efi". NOTE: This is broken in the latest binary I checked. 1.2) if unsuccessful, use the following hard-coded paths: "\System\Library\CoreServices\boot.efi", "\EFI\APPLE\{ARCH}\BOOT.EFI", <StandardEfiPath>, "\\boot.efi" in this order 2) FV2 Recovery does not follow the usual practice because it is not shown by BootPicker anyway. Determine it via https://github.com/CupertinoNet/EfiPkg/blob/development/Include/Guid/AppleBless.h#L49, verify it does not match 1).   APFS Boot 1) Determine the APFS Volume Info (and hencefor detect whether it is APFS in the first place) via https://github.com/CupertinoNet/EfiPkg/blob/development/Include/Guid/AppleApfsInfo.h#L54 1.1) Determine the APFS Container Info via https://github.com/CupertinoNet/EfiPkg/blob/development/Include/Guid/AppleApfsInfo.h#L36 1.2) Verify the Volume Role via https://github.com/CupertinoNet/EfiPkg/blob/development/Include/Guid/AppleApfsInfo.h#L51 1.3) Retrieve blessed file analoguous to HFS 1). NOTE: This step and 1.3.1) are broken in the binary I checked, hencefor it does not happen, but is probably supposed to. 1.3.1) if unsuccessful, retrieve blessed folder and append the booter name the same way as in HFS 1.2) 1.4) (if unsuccessful,) locate all Volumes that are part of the same container, check whether the current Preboot partition has folders named by the just located Volumes' GUIDs and append the hard-coded paths from HFS 1.2) if existant 2) Recovery detection works the same way as 1.4), just for a Recovery instead of a Preboot volume
    • Got garbled sound in earphone    Notebook Asus X550VX i7 - 7700hq with ALC255 not working with applealc  layout id  3, 13, 17, 18, 27, 28, 99 its is working with VoodooHDA but the new one 2.9.1 it much has low volume, but bad sound in earphone     codec dump linux https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pg2y76WvFYsO8vFY-2B_2OLyKMmkQ8Tg/view     latest debug http://www.mediafire.com/file/2pjny4eq5r64ed8/debug_1383 (1).zip  
    • For F6 Bios, which DSDT is the one i should use? I´m a little confused in the Mass of DSDT here ;-).   Great Thread by the Way.   Another Question: I have 2 960Pro inside my Rig (one with OS X, one with Windows 10). When i try to mount my EFI on OS X NVMe the system freezes... :-(   DWhen i unplug the Windows NVMe everything is fine an it mounts the EFI.   Anybody an idea?   Tried the upper Port on the Board (OS X) & the middle / lower Port, in the Middle it mounts the EFI in the lower it freezes.   But i need the middle Port for an SATA M.2 SSD :-D... Even when i plug the Windows NVMe into an PCIe Adapter Card it freezes at the point i mount the EFI.   I´m mounting with Clover Configurator.     Thank You guys.
    •   Just add "ngfxsubmit=0" to config.plist to disable the fix within nvidiafixup
    • @MegaCookie   ok, I have no solution for that Trial 7 good for the release?
      Is this codec good enough for you?


×