http://rs180.rapidsh...nel_Patcher.zip
This file contains NO illegal files or copywrited material and is perfectly acceptable to post here.
Mac OS X Leopard GM Final 9A581 Kernel Patch (INTEL/AMD/NO-HPET/NO-NX/SSE2) and Source Code for OSx86 Hackintosh
This kernel patch will allow you to run the newest leopard build (10.5 final or 9a581) on your (non apple) Intel or AMD pc.
Also included is the source code that was originally written by Lorem (oui, socket), Maxxuss, and Rufus for SSE3 emulation, the CPUID_SET_INFO patch that allows it to run on non Intel, and also several other tweaks and patches that allows all of this to work. This should be open to the world to have, so that others may be able to pick up where they left off and make their own kernels, and not just a few select people to have. The author of the source code has given me permission to post it here.
Mac OS X Leopard GM Final 9A581 Kernel Patch (INTEL/AMD/NO-HPET/NO-NX/SSE2)
Started by Lord.ButtPlug, Oct 27 2007 05:06 PM
58 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 27 October 2007 - 05:06 PM
#2
Posted 27 October 2007 - 05:15 PM
OMG -- The Source !!
Now the world never be the same!!
Now the world never be the same!!
#3
Posted 27 October 2007 - 05:20 PM
#4
Posted 27 October 2007 - 05:21 PM
Props for the good work!!! Btw does this need Tiger preinstalled? Either way, awesome work!!!!!
#5
Posted 27 October 2007 - 05:44 PM
Awesome!
#6
Posted 27 October 2007 - 05:48 PM
so. SSE2 with SSE3 emulation? Does this mean that with my SSE3 Athlon 64, it will be emulating the SSE3 stuff?
#7
Posted 27 October 2007 - 05:48 PM
Really ? Leopard for AMD ? Wooowwwww !
#8
Posted 27 October 2007 - 05:52 PM
A very big thanks for sharing knowledge (and the patch
)
#9
Posted 27 October 2007 - 05:58 PM
to those who didnt have any OS X yet.
Can you do the patch kind of this to patch Leopard in Vista, XP
Can you do the patch kind of this to patch Leopard in Vista, XP
#10
Posted 27 October 2007 - 06:12 PM
Netkas has his own kernel out too, and I don't think it is great to have a bunch of clowns making kernel left right and centre, we will have tons of crap, and Apple will make it harder to crack for all can see how it was cracked now.
#11
Posted 27 October 2007 - 06:25 PM
Could someone please post some instructions on how to use this patcher?
#12
Posted 27 October 2007 - 06:29 PM
instruction is inside archive
#13
Posted 27 October 2007 - 06:41 PM
Wow! Thats amazing! Thank you very much, and thanks to all that helped to make this work.
#14
Posted 27 October 2007 - 06:46 PM
Could someone uplaod it again
the rapidshare link does'nt work, may be too much access or
legal action from the fruit ?
Thanks
the rapidshare link does'nt work, may be too much access or
legal action from the fruit ?
Thanks
#15
Posted 27 October 2007 - 06:58 PM
it looks like they put it on the bay as well.
#16
Posted 27 October 2007 - 07:03 PM
Lord.ButtPlug, on Oct 27 2007, 01:06 PM, said:
This file contains NO illegal files or copywrited material and is perfectly acceptable to post here.
Umm... I am not sure what the current the DMCA policy is here... or even if this site is still under US jurisdiction, but in the Mashugly days of InsanelyMac this posting would be in violation site policy.
Just to be clear, like everyone else here I use these types patchs. We just want to make sure that this site stays out of Apple Legal trouble, which can be quite damaging.
#17
Posted 27 October 2007 - 07:12 PM
macwanabe, on Oct 27 2007, 06:12 PM, said:
Netkas has his own kernel out too, and I don't think it is great to have a bunch of clowns making kernel left right and centre, we will have tons of crap, and Apple will make it harder to crack for all can see how it was cracked now.
Very bad post
If I were a mod I'd delete it. Because you prefer the work of one developer you shouldn't call the others "clowns".
#18
Posted 27 October 2007 - 07:16 PM
macwanabe, on Oct 27 2007, 02:12 PM, said:
Netkas has his own kernel out too, and I don't think it is great to have a bunch of clowns making kernel left right and centre...
Thanks for the information on Netkas' kernel, but I think that it is good to have choices. I mean, the more people working on OS X kernels and hacks, the stronger the OSx86 community is.
#19
Posted 27 October 2007 - 07:28 PM
I'm using an Intel Core 2 Duo E6320.
When I use this kernel it says I have an Intel Core 2 Solo.
If I use the one from BrazilMac's Pack it says I have an Intel Core 2 Duo.
When I use this kernel it says I have an Intel Core 2 Solo.
If I use the one from BrazilMac's Pack it says I have an Intel Core 2 Duo.
#20
Posted 27 October 2007 - 07:30 PM
This is Great and for anyone who thinks this will make it harder to crack the kernels. since Apple can see what was done.This wont change anything they know what is going on.Apple does not need to even look at it cause they know how there kernel works...LOL there not stupid..
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Sign In
Create Account








