Jump to content

x86 version of 10.2


  • Please log in to reply
165 replies to this topic

#1
Dragon

Dragon

    Insanely Dragon

  • Retired Developers
  • 414 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:InsanelyMac forum
"Apple is internally running a complete, x86-compatible version of Jaguar, a k a Mac OS X 10.2, which shipped last week. "

- Apple Keeps x86 Torch Lit with 'Marklar'
http://www.eweek.com...,1656622,00.asp




was it ever leaked?

#2
Colonel

Colonel

    11 Herbs & Spices

  • Retired
  • 4,157 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:KFC

was it ever leaked?

I wish!

#3
OMX-Knuckles

OMX-Knuckles

    Girl wif the hammer ^_^

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 318 posts
  • Gender:Female
Still, it would be neat to see. I've wondered if a 10.1 or 10.2 build would still have the SSE2 limitation. It would be very neat to have OSX on my old P3 laptop or dually P3, even if it wasn't particularly functional!

Edited by OMX-Knuckles, 30 December 2006 - 07:18 AM.


#4
Dragon

Dragon

    Insanely Dragon

  • Retired Developers
  • 414 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:InsanelyMac forum
if anyone knows where a copy would be available could they please help us out?

ALSO, would the same source modifications semthex used on the 10.4.8 kernel work on the open source version of an earlier OS X that doesn't rely on sse2? that would be an osx86 breakthrough if that was possible.

#5
adriandkicks

adriandkicks

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 64 posts
I remember reading that on my old pentium 3 box back when the article was released and remember thinging about how coolit would be for me to have a copy of OS X on my PC...Granted I had a Pentium 1 system I was using for rhapsody DR2 almost every day.

#6
Dragon

Dragon

    Insanely Dragon

  • Retired Developers
  • 414 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:InsanelyMac forum
we must get a copy of this 10.2 x86 build or find a way to get OS X working using an old kernel (if that's possible).

#7
user2

user2

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 524 posts

we must get a copy of this 10.2 x86 build or find a way to get OS X working using an old kernel (if that's possible).


Good luck.

#8
CyBrian

CyBrian

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 66 posts
i know where to get it. you go to apple's headquarters (1 infinite loop, cupertino, california). make sure you enter via the back door as there are guards with machine guns at the front door. turn left at the first hallway. right at the next. right again. go down the stairs straight ahead. turn left. go down the other flight. turn right. go to the safe. the code's 8-90-24. careful. move too fast and it'll set off the alarm. there's 351 dvds in that safe. one of them contains mac os x jaguar x86 edition. if you can, just take them all since they only have dates on them. good luck getting out of there, though. they have silent alarms everywhere and if you set one off there's no way to know without having a machine gun pointed at you.

Edited by CyBrian, 30 December 2006 - 02:04 PM.


#9
Dragon

Dragon

    Insanely Dragon

  • Retired Developers
  • 414 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:InsanelyMac forum
well this : http://www.opensourc...nx86-141.iso.gz
is 10.0 darwin binary (x86)
and this : http://www.opensourc...winsource/10.0/
is the 10.0 darwin source

i found out that older versions of darwin don't require sse2 but most os x applications require sse2 to run. still... getting os x to run would be an accomplishment.

#10
McSkywalker

McSkywalker

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 609 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Corusant
  • Interests:2D - 3D design<br />Painting<br />Guitar playing<br />Woodworking - Gran...
I don't think it would need to be patched and it should support SSE2 CPU's. 10.2 was introduced in 2002 and SSE3 was introduced in 2004.

It was an internal development build to be used on "ADP" machines, which basically were regular PC's, I suppose.

So,

Finding it should be sufficient.

#11
Embio

Embio

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 976 posts
If this had leaked, wouldnt it have been a similiar situation to the release of OSx86? What I mean is we would have had the same situation as we had last november, only a 3 years ago. OS X on x86 would have been huge even 3 years ago.... I might be wrong of course.

#12
bwhsh8r

bwhsh8r

    InsanelyMac Deity

  • Gurus
  • 2,085 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Machine
it did leak to the internet... http://www.mymac.com...cle.php?id=1048

it did leak... Marklar-Tiger.iso :) so, all i have to do now is find that {censored}


well, that wasnt hard, i found it, just gotta check if it has seeds :D cant wait to share!

found two copies, an iso copy and an .dmg, im downloading both and cant wait to get them done for you guys ;)

#13
Colonel

Colonel

    11 Herbs & Spices

  • Retired
  • 4,157 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:KFC

it did leak... Marklar-Tiger.iso :) so, all i have to do now is find that {censored}

Um...Marklar-Tiger.iso sounds like a 10.4 image to me. ;)

#14
Dragon

Dragon

    Insanely Dragon

  • Retired Developers
  • 414 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:InsanelyMac forum
mcskywalker: the 10.2 darwin kernel (x86) runs on sse-only pc's. I had it running on my p3 laptop a while ago.

EDIT: The Marklar build of Tiger was the first build to be leaked to the public. I think that if Jaguar was leaked it would be a very rare find.

#15
Dragon

Dragon

    Insanely Dragon

  • Retired Developers
  • 414 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:InsanelyMac forum
we have the darwin kernel source for the x86 10.2 build but we don't have the rest of the jaguar intel files. if we can't get the jaguar x86 build then the only other option would be to try and use the jaguar kernel with tiger, but still most of tiger probably relies on sse2.

#16
bwhsh8r

bwhsh8r

    InsanelyMac Deity

  • Gurus
  • 2,085 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Machine

Um...Marklar-Tiger.iso sounds like a 10.4 image to me. :wacko:



lol, yep, i figured that out...

#17
Sondless

Sondless

    InsanelyMac Deity

  • Donators
  • 2,318 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hick-land (A.K.A indiana)
  • Interests:surfing, macs, skating, scheming
this would be cool, i love 10.2, it almoast passes tiger in my view

#18
Dragon

Dragon

    Insanely Dragon

  • Retired Developers
  • 414 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:InsanelyMac forum
well we need to do what semthex did with 10.4.8 kernel?

#19
Sherry Haibara

Sherry Haibara

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 699 posts
No, we need to have the original image, that probably is not protected and doesn't need any patches. :hysterical:
I think the only place where we can have some chances to find it is at the Apple Campus in Cupertino :hysterical:
Sherry Haibara

#20
Dragon

Dragon

    Insanely Dragon

  • Retired Developers
  • 414 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:InsanelyMac forum
The latest version of darwin that does not require SSE2 is OS X 10.4 - darwin kernel version 8.0.0.
8.0.1 is the first version that requires SSE2.
the kernel version in marklar-tiger.dmg is 8.1 (10.4.1), so it may be possible to use the earlier tiger kernel in the marklar-tiger image with a bit of modifying.

please correct me if any of this info is wrong.

EDIT: remember, we got every version of OS X from 10.4.4 to 10.4.8 running on 8.4.1 kernel. And also got leopard running on the tiger 10.4.8 kernel.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

© 2014 InsanelyMac  |   News  |   Forum  |   Downloads  |   OSx86 Wiki  |   Mac Netbook  |   PHP hosting by CatN  |   Designed by Ed Gain  |   Logo by irfan  |   Privacy Policy