confirmed....not working!!!
73 replies to this topic
#41
Posted 07 May 2012 - 12:03 PM
#42
Posted 07 May 2012 - 05:57 PM
Yep, that down worry and use other OpenCL Benchmarks like Luxmark 2.0 or OpenCL_OceanWave.
#43
Posted 07 May 2012 - 06:04 PM
10.7.4 Lion
#44
Posted 08 May 2012 - 04:30 AM
damn...found my problem...a bad edit in geforcegldriverbundle... fixed after reading this:
in 10.7.3 there is a change in the GeForceGLDriver... see below
From Netkas Thread:
Find
EB A8 83 F8 02 7C 15
replace 02 with 03 to get
EB A8 83 F8 03 7C 15
Find
78 E8 83 F8 02 7C 11
replace 02 with 03 to get
78 E8 83 F8 03 7C 11
i didn't do the edit in bold...(in HexEdit)
...seems all good now...my bad...( i only get 60-65 gigaflops with my GeForce GT 520)
in 10.7.3 there is a change in the GeForceGLDriver... see below
From Netkas Thread:
Find
EB A8 83 F8 02 7C 15
replace 02 with 03 to get
EB A8 83 F8 03 7C 15
Find
78 E8 83 F8 02 7C 11
replace 02 with 03 to get
78 E8 83 F8 03 7C 11
i didn't do the edit in bold...(in HexEdit)
#45
Posted 08 May 2012 - 08:57 AM
Good to hear you get your fermi lowend GT 520 cardto work. 9600 GT gets 131 (10.7.3 and 10.7.4)
What result with Luxmark 2.0 in the small Luxball Scene ? i get around 740 (and 74 in the middle complex scene, 25 very complex scene)
http://www.luxrender...uxMark#Download
Oceanwave (attached) gets around 90 FPS. All results for Nvidia 9600 GT.
Fermi gpu type doesnt mean its always faster than the old non fermi types. For example the GTX 680 is great in OpenGL but very bad in OpenCL speed compared to GTX 580. GTX 680 plays in OpenCL region of GTX 460-GTX 470. Upcoming GTX 690 is much faster in OpenCL (ok, it has 2 OpenCL gpus on the card
)
What result with Luxmark 2.0 in the small Luxball Scene ? i get around 740 (and 74 in the middle complex scene, 25 very complex scene)
http://www.luxrender...uxMark#Download
Oceanwave (attached) gets around 90 FPS. All results for Nvidia 9600 GT.
Fermi gpu type doesnt mean its always faster than the old non fermi types. For example the GTX 680 is great in OpenGL but very bad in OpenCL speed compared to GTX 580. GTX 680 plays in OpenCL region of GTX 460-GTX 470. Upcoming GTX 690 is much faster in OpenCL (ok, it has 2 OpenCL gpus on the card
Attached Files
#46
Posted 08 May 2012 - 12:44 PM
robertx, on 08 May 2012 - 04:30 AM, said:
damn...found my problem...a bad edit in geforcegldriverbundle... fixed after reading this:
in 10.7.3 there is a change in the GeForceGLDriver... see below
From Netkas Thread:
Find
EB A8 83 F8 02 7C 15
replace 02 with 03 to get
EB A8 83 F8 03 7C 15
Find
78 E8 83 F8 02 7C 11
replace 02 with 03 to get
78 E8 83 F8 03 7C 11
i didn't do the edit in bold...(in HexEdit)
...seems all good now...my bad...( i only get 60-65 gigaflops with my GeForce GT 520)
in 10.7.3 there is a change in the GeForceGLDriver... see below
From Netkas Thread:
Find
EB A8 83 F8 02 7C 15
replace 02 with 03 to get
EB A8 83 F8 03 7C 15
Find
78 E8 83 F8 02 7C 11
replace 02 with 03 to get
78 E8 83 F8 03 7C 11
i didn't do the edit in bold...(in HexEdit)
thanx for da headsup....wrong edit too!!!fixed
432 gflops...thanx guys
#47
Posted 30 September 2012 - 09:54 PM
10.8.2, Nvidia 670 GTX (EVGA non-OC), 940 Gigaflops in Galaxies.
#48
Posted 07 October 2012 - 09:07 AM
10.8.2., NVidia 304.00.05f02 driver, Asus GTX670, 2560x1600, 918 Gigaflops in Galaxies
#49
Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:20 AM
Schermata 2012-12-04 alle 01.15.48.png 164.7K
11 downloads10.8.2 NVidia 304.00.05f02 driver, Asus GTX660ti, 1920x1200
#50
Posted 04 December 2012 - 08:19 AM
Great to see 1K Gigaflop was reached.
#51
Posted 04 December 2012 - 08:57 AM
AMD6870 - OS X Mountain Lion build 12D32
#52
Posted 04 December 2012 - 09:12 AM
AMD 78/9XX will be the fastest OpenCL card in near future i think. At least from the HW speed it shoud be beat any Nvidia. Maybe AMD OpenCL framework/drivers are the bottleneck.
PS: Have you already tried new Furmark OpenGL Benchmark? Happy to see new results
http://www.insanelym...x/#entry1867811
PS: Have you already tried new Furmark OpenGL Benchmark? Happy to see new results
http://www.insanelym...x/#entry1867811
#53
Posted 05 December 2012 - 07:29 PM
MSI 7970 10.8.3 beta !
edit: new bench whit browser closed:
edit: new bench whit browser closed:
Attached Files
#54
Posted 05 December 2012 - 09:59 PM
Outstanding result!
#55
Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:06 AM
This mean can i have the pole position ? 
#56
Posted 06 December 2012 - 08:05 AM
YES - an i think for a long time (until other similar AMDs bench or Nvidia build new highend gpus next year)
#57
Posted 06 December 2012 - 07:21 PM
here is my go at it
Attached Files
#58
Posted 08 December 2012 - 01:08 AM
#59
Posted 09 December 2012 - 06:06 AM
Is it an over clocked 7970, sea_man?
#60
Posted 15 December 2012 - 07:41 AM
To answer that question for him Yes it was overclocked it had 1010mhz bios on that card. Mine is at 925mhz. I'm pretty sure this is the card he has, http://us.ncix.com/products/?sku=68758
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Sign In
Create Account










