Rhapsody Guru Posted August 27, 2006 Share Posted August 27, 2006 Guys: Have any idea where the rather shady "Copland" build of Mac OS is? I can't find much information on it. Guru Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vince29 Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 Copland was never finished. When they decided to end this program, all they had was pieces of code which should have magically gotten together to work. [EDIT] : just in case, I gogled a little and found out that a copy of "copland dr-0" was sent to some developers, but it usually crashed before they had time to do anything productive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 You might want to take a look at this. http://arstechnica.com/reviews/01q2/macos-.../macos-x-1.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackandblue Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I used to have a copy but i lost it along with Rhapsody and years of downloaded {censored} in a bit of a partitioning accident when i installed OSX86. I had downloaded it from some Hotline server ages ago. It only ran on a VERY select few powermacs, needed another connected at all times set up as a debugger and pretty much did nothing. Its still floating around some ftps and hotline servers, i think. i never got it working either, but i never had anything that would run it anyhow. I did try it on my powerbook 1400 but it bombed and crashed at boot. There is scarce info about on it. There was one forum which i found a ton of info for it on, but i cant remember what it was. Ill delve into google and see what we can scrounge up! http://macdomain.abwnet.org seems to have a download but its down. http://www.68kmla.net/ these guys are fair cluely about copland too and of course wiki has a fair swath of info too http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RacerX Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 It only ran on a VERY select few powermacs, needed another connected at all times set up as a debugger and pretty much did nothing.Part of the reason for this was that the versions floating around were designed for hardware developers so that they could help Apple with stabilizing the system. It never reached the point of being sent to software (application) developers. The underpinnings of Copland started to be integrated with the Mac OS with Mac OS 8.0/8.1, with more elements being added with Mac OS 8.5/8.6 and 9.0/9.1. Copland originally was to have a completely new application environment, but developers got wind of this and protested forcing Apple to rework the application environment in Copland to be based on the original Mac APIs. When developers pulled pretty much the same protest with Rhapsody, Apple turned to the application environment built for Copland. This was how Apple was able to get Carbon running on a special version of Rhapsody 5.1 for WWDC so that they could demo apps like Simple Text, AppleWorks 5 and Photoshop 5 running natively in Rhapsody during the Keynote with only a few weeks of work. Of course the fact that they were able to do all that within a few weeks is also why Apple gave overly optimistic release dates for Mac OS X. Once they spent a little more time with "Carbon" they quickly found that the Copland development team wasn't as far along as they had originally thought... and that getting Carbon ready for real world use was going to take quite a bit longer. Apple also had to prove to old Mac developers that Carbon was going to be given as much attention as Cocoa in Mac OS X. This was why Apple started over from scratch in building the Finder as a Carbon app. By making the single most important application in Mac OS X a Carbon app, Apple showed developers that they were truly investing time and effort in the Carbon environment. When you think about it, by Mac OS 8.5 quite a bit of Copland was present. A number of the kernel elements had been added (enabling multitasking, multithreading and partial protected memory), the Platinum theme (and themes in general by 8.5) were added, special find and open/save dialogs were added (this was completed by 9.x), and the application environment was added (with the addition of Carbon in 8.5). Copland by itself may have been a failure as a stand alone OS, but almost every part of Copland was eventually used. Apple made great use of the concept of "waste not, want not" after Jobs returned. In addition to using many parts of Copland for both Mac OS 8/9 and Mac OS X, Apple also reused the technology in MAE (Macintosh Application Environment for UNIX based systems) in the development of Blue Box... which later became Classic. I wouldn't even be surprised to find that Apple used elements of MacX in X11 (though I'm not sure that it would have been as helpful as other previous Apple technologies as a starting point). Anyways, that may help put Copland into a little better historical perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwhsh8r Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 well, idk, matt was gracious enough to give me the files, but theyre just files, not an iso or anything, any insight matt? if anyone can tell me how i would go about getting this into iso format it would be much appriciated (heh arix) max Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhapsody Guru Posted September 13, 2006 Author Share Posted September 13, 2006 Ok dude... here is the lowdown. I just found out from a collegue that the Copland .SIT files are to be opened and installed on a system with MacOS 7.5.x or MacOS 7.6.x already installed. When you want to try Copland, boot up System 7.5 or 7.6, extract the .SIT file to a directory, and run the installer. There is no such thing as an iso. In this case, you may want to get a m68k emulator and install System 7.5 or 7.6 on it and install Copland in the emulator. Hope that helps. Guru Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwhsh8r Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 Ok dude... here is the lowdown. I just found out from a collegue that the Copland .SIT files are to be opened and installed on a system with MacOS 7.5.x or MacOS 7.6.x already installed. When you want to try Copland, boot up System 7.5 or 7.6, extract the .SIT file to a directory, and run the installer. There is no such thing as an iso. In this case, you may want to get a m68k emulator and install System 7.5 or 7.6 on it and install Copland in the emulator. Hope that helps. Guru ohhh thanks, allright will do max Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RacerX Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 In this case, you may want to get a m68k emulator and install System 7.5 or 7.6 on it and install Copland in the emulator. Hope that helps.I'll be the first to admit that I'm not much of an expert on emulation, but how is a PowerPC operating system supposed to run in a 68k emulator? Did I miss something here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 System 7 was for 68k last time I checked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RacerX Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 System 7 was for 68k last time I checked.And Copland was PowerPC the last time I checked. ... which means that the question remains: How do you run a PowerPC OS in a 68k emulator? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 Can we just forget the 68k red herring? how about sheepshaver? That should be able to boot 7.6 & unpack the SITs.. I'm just wondering what kind of rom it would need to run to work with both sheepshaver & copland.. I remember copland floating about way back in the day.. the only thing that really caught on was the gui, & numerous themes were made to make MacOS more coplandish.. I think I ran one or two myself.. In any caser, this isn't one I'm going to get into, I still have rhapsody to untangle (damn graphics drivers) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invisibl Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 c@rr@ch0 68.44.250.101:9700 might be interesting..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhapsody Guru Posted September 29, 2006 Author Share Posted September 29, 2006 c@rr@ch0 68.44.250.101:9700 might be interesting..... Uh... what is that? Guru Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(MoC) Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 Hey, what was the compuetr designed for copland for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhapsody Guru Posted September 29, 2006 Author Share Posted September 29, 2006 Hey, what was the compuetr designed for copland for? m68k and PPC platforms are supported by Copland as far as I know. SheepSaver may be able to pull off Copland! Guru Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korrupted Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 Can we just forget the 68k red herring? how about sheepshaver? That should be able to boot 7.6 & unpack the SITs.. I'm just wondering what kind of rom it would need to run to work with both sheepshaver & copland.. I remember copland floating about way back in the day.. the only thing that really caught on was the gui, & numerous themes were made to make MacOS more coplandish.. I think I ran one or two myself.. In any caser, this isn't one I'm going to get into, I still have rhapsody to untangle (damn graphics drivers) Sheepshaver only boots Mac OS 8.5 and above I think.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grabberslasher Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 Afaik Copland never worked in an emulator. There are two versions of it floating around, D11E4 (which probably doesn't require a debugger) and D7E1. I only ever got D7E1 to boot, and that was to an error screen (unable to find gDevice). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriX Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 Sheepshaver only boots Mac OS 8.5 and above I think.. no, it can go all the way down to 7.6 (and maybe lower) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Luca Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 Can anyone write a small HOW-TO install copland in a pre-existing System 7.5 installation? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriX Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 No one's gotten it to work yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwhsh8r Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 No one's gotten it to work yet. idk, ill try it out some time. max Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Luca Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 I didn't mean "how to get it working".... I just asked if there's a "standard" way of simply installing it... I saw that we have to do something with "scarecrow" and "non-scarecrow" volumes... what does it mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RacerX Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 Guys, you do realize that none of these releases were designed to be run "in the wild", on stand alone systems. These releases were for hardware developers to help create drivers to finally put together a stable (self supporting) release. As it is, Copland releases were for very specific hardware to run on and additionally needed a second system to support the running of Copland on the hardware it is running on. Further, you need a hardware debugger running on the secondary system to provide the support to keep Copland running at all. So unless you can emulate two Macs connected to each other via a serial connection with at least one of them meeting the hardware requirements for Copland... you are all barking up the wrong tree. For those of you with Macs that fit the qualifications... experience setting up and using a hardware debugger to initiate and sustain the Copland system would be needed (assuming that you even have access to the debugger software needed to do all that). But if any of you get that far, this is most likely what you'll be greeted with during startup... Best of luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invisibl Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 @ GURU c@rr@ch0 is Carracho ....The application 68.44.250.101:9700 ............... is the address of a server ) whose name escapes me) where a bunch of older mac os's are housed/hosted....... Incl Rhapsody Unless I mistaook yr question........... PM me if i am way off base Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts