Jump to content

the guys over @ http://forums.krazynonsense.com/showthread...p?p=448#post448

are talking about the dev dvd for osx86 being leaked to morrrow the day after.

 

i dont know if there is any truth behind this. but it would be great to finaly get our hands on this fantastic OS.

 

i hope we can still reach the target for our Dev kit donations. because it will help with the cracking of the TCPA that apple has put into

osx86.


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



rose

Posted

But what I am looking for is something similar to Norton Ghost where you could backup the whole drive and then restore it to a PC.  Is there a way to do that?

 

you wnat g4u. the author is genius. its works you just need a live ftp server with an account called install. its quite slow. but it REALLY works and is Filesystem AGNOSTIC!

 

g4u google it

 

 

http://www.feyrer.de/g4u/

 

its a boot cd it dds and gzips your had image .. best to sue perl to zero out all teh empty sectors.

um it then can upload a tar.gz quite compoact

 

but quite time consuming

 

but very good.

 

 

please donate ot his guy if you find it sueful

Potemkin

Posted

Man.. It's dangerous to post links to topics like these on big trackers. People just fill it with garbage like "How can I make Mac OS run by clicking an icon on the desktop".. Eesh. (I found the link on the PirateBay.org and just read through the whole topic)

cajuncoon

Posted

haha gradual decay thats funny.

RDTG

Posted

For all of you giving MACTEL instructions, note this thread is for DEV DVD, not MACTEL. :(

Guest

Posted

no way...if that's real, then you can call me santa...

cajuncoon

Posted

i'm extracting another xiso image. I corrupted mines after a long night of torturing it with file extracting and injection

 

 

whoa hold on the xiso seems to be the failed one at the bottom

 

http://www.livejournal.com/users/brian_q/ look at the second line of picture witht the two black screens i wonder what release he was using then :D

rakshasa

Posted

no way...if that's real, then you can call me santa...

 

And I'll be your elf.

 

If I hadn't deleted the fake in utter disgust, I'd verify that this is yet more trash. Someone else..?

bubbaganoush

Posted

okay, forget that.

The "spiro multimax 3000" you see in the first screenshot is a pearpc thing.

cajuncoon

Posted

omg!

this is the flasher release.

 

it had {censored} porn pictures on here when you switch the dates the pc freezes and {censored} picture play slideshow while the dialup modem buzzes

 

:D I have family in the room this is wrong i wish whoever made this release would go somewhere and die

 

I knew XISO was fake i just didnt know this was that perverted 800mb release at the same time as mactel

philburr

Posted

okay, forget that.  

The "spiro multimax 3000" you see in the first screenshot is a pearpc thing.

 

Wouldn't it be even funnier if there were pearpc code in osx x86? :D

mallyone

Posted

Maybe Rosetta is based on pearpc? :D

mstrobel

Posted

Saw this on another forum O_o

http://www.livejournal.com/users/brian_q/

 

Well, he can't possibly be booting that on a ThinkPad T41p (unless he's doing it through PearPC). I have a T41p, and it uses a Pentium M CPU and does not support SSE3. Additionally, it has an ATI FireGL T2 GPU, so video would be unsupported as well.

 

*EDIT* OK, so apparently he is booting with PearPC... nevermind. Sorry, I should really not post to forums after having this much to drink.

BastiX

Posted

The Assembler code posted on that site is actually {censored}.

"2005h" and "0804h" declares an hexadecimal value.

Which means some day in the year 8197 :lol:

lanny

Posted

The Assembler code posted on that site is actually {censored}.

"2005h" and "0804h" declares an hexadecimal value.

Which means some day in the year 8197 :lol:

 

Not quite. Im too tired to explain it, but the bios call returns the date in BCD format. That means 2005h = 2005d.

 

But I bet also that it was a fake anyway. I haven'seen any info on starting the graphic environment on an install disk. And if he modified the graphic core on the istall cd he wold probably wrote something about it.

yellowbkpk

Posted

The Assembler code posted on that site is actually {censored}.

"2005h" and "0804h" declares an hexadecimal value.

Which means some day in the year 8197 :lol:

 

0x2005 = 0010000000000101 binary

 

break it up:

 

0010 = 2

0000 = 0

0000 = 0

0101 = 5

 

0x0804 = 0000100000000100 binary

 

0000 = 0

1000 = 8

0000 = 0

0100 = 4

 

Aug 4, 2005.

BastiX

Posted

The Assembler code posted on that site is actually {censored}.

"2005h" and "0804h" declares an hexadecimal value.

Which means some day in the year 8197 :lol:

 

Not quite. Im too tired to explain it, but the bios call returns the date in BCD format. That means 2005h = 2005d.

 

But I bet also that it was a fake anyway. I haven'seen any info on starting the graphic environment on an install disk. And if he modified the graphic core on the istall cd he wold probably wrote something about it.

 

I figured that out, sorry. Seems to be a very x86 specific "feature" ;)

fbartho

Posted

guys, not that it should be neccessary at this point, but they were right about the fraudulent error preventing you from running it till the 4th. It was a fake though, packaged by GNAA and with the most disturbing images I've ever seen. Goatse, lemon-party and tubgirl were the "tame" ones in the slideshow it boots to. You've been warned.

cajuncoon

Posted

take it from me i know i had family in the room and the cursor was stuck in vmware and all i seen was some of the grosses mess ive ever seen :lol: and on top of that the dialup modem buzzes like a siren

zhLilDoggi

Posted

take it from me i know i had family in the room and the cursor was stuck in vmware and all i seen was some of the grosses mess ive ever seen :) and on top of that the dialup modem buzzes like a siren

 

Were you showing off?

cajuncoon

Posted

? NO those pics where gross stop mentioning them im trying to delete them from my memory

brotproblem

Posted

After trying several types of installation i found a very strange thing.

 

As i suppose to have the correct Devkit-DVD (md5 checked) i wonder why there are so few kext's in /System/Library/Extensions. The most important thing is that there is no AppleTPMACPI.kext, but you will find Rosetta in /usr/libexec/oah.

 

As the Installer needs ATSServer, and as ATSServer is only in PPC-Binary, it should need Rosetta to run. How is Rosetta started off the DVD if there is no TPM-Extension?

 

Correct me if i'm totally wrong, but this shows me that there is another way to start Rosetta TPM-less ???

niteice

Posted

I believe that it contains both ISO and HFS+ volumes, open it up with a program like UltraISO and check both.

brotproblem

Posted

already done, the ISO-FS won't even have an Extensions-Folder

zhLilDoggi

Posted

? NO those pics where gross stop mentioning them im trying to delete them from my memory

 

:o uhmm....ok :)



×
×
  • Create New...