Jump to content

News and Editorial: Apple Seeds New 10.4.2 Build


sHARD>>

After the recent seed of OS X for Intel version 10.4.2 (build 8B1072) to Apple ADC members, we've received confirmed today reports that Apple has seeded a new update, available through the "Software Update" system. Known as 10.4.2 build 8B1072A, this new version fixes graphics and performance issues and is purported to prevent current workarounds for running the system. Weighing in at 26.6MB, this update is quite small, but provides radical changes.

 

After much speculation has been tossed around as to how Apple would lockdown their new Intel operating system, perhaps we have found the answer. Many popular blogs and websites have begun to think that Apple may, in fact, be using the community of enthusiasts to find the bugs in their new OS and crush them, leaving a truly user tested final product which is almost uncrackable. When looking at Apple's track record, it would almost seem ludicrous, why would the company for the people use the people as a tool? Well, it's a few elements working together. Most importantly, Apple isn't for the people. Apple is for the cash. As it's been said before, Apple IS a hardware company, and until they change their focus (not something to be ruled out), they will still make their cash selling you iBooks and PowerMacs. It's a simple fact of life. Any company which doesn't watch out for profits will die.

 

Most interesting, however, is the method this update was delivered. Ponder this: Apple adds support for new features and fixes security flaws, seeding these updates through Software Update. However, these updates also lock out any cracks and holes that have recently been discovered. Sounds like a good deal right? Just don't update. Except for one problem. Imagine that Apple then strongly "advises" publishers to only allow their software to work with these updated versions. Suddenly users without updates are locked out.

 

While this may seem like a smart measure to prevent piracy, let’s look at the whole picture. Many Apple users love their legacy hardware and Apple famously supports them past their death date. Look at the number of computers still running 10.3, 10.2, or even 10.1 and 10.0, simply because they can't handle the latest updates. Although these are major revisions, which, of course, have some incompatibilities, imagine this process compressed to the point where a single update stops you from running that latest programs. Perhaps this update breaks something in your hardware as Apple phases out support, perhaps it just has a new bug, either way, it could spell trouble.

 

 

At this point I think many Apple fanboys put too much trust in Apple. Yes, they could do it right and only break compatibility between major revisions, yes, they could debug the updates incredibly well and keep out all but the smallest bugs. But Apple is really out there to make money. Can we really trust that? Maybe Apple isn't God's gift to the geek, but then again, do we really need one? Perhaps we should love the product and not the company, because the two just don't go hand in hand.


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



If no one's talking about the actual topic, it derails. That's a basic forum guideline. :) Everyone lost interest in the editorial a while ago. Apple is evil is now "Will apple sell OSx86?" and more recently, "What are the benefits of game consoles with desktop functions?" :)

 

Besides, this topic had nothing to do with the leaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 10.4.2.a build will be obsolete soon enough and a new 10.4.3 build will be around the corner. But until then, we need the basic 10.4.2 build that has a working system updater.

 

Well, I think we are close to a real 10.4.2 leak as Apple may be distributing an unmarked DVD to developers at this time. However, general use of the updater might be a security mistake. But someone should be able to anonymously capture a copy of the 10.4.2A update file and then seed it for manual updates.

 

As far as 10.4.3 goes, there is some speculation that it's delay on the PPC side is part of the reason Apple has yet to update the PowerBook and PowerMac lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UNIX GUI is horrible, even when compared to Windows. Sure, it's ugly, but it's slow and unresponsive, and way too flexible. X11 is too layered. You have X, a DE, and an app. Sounds simple, but you have ninety thousand different toolkits, including Qt and GTK+, which are each used by 40% of Linux users. And Qt is dual-licensed, and there's all this useless politics between X implementations.

 

Which is why I speculate that Apple will get a lot of people from the Linux camp who are attracted to a good looking BSD Unix based Operating system. Once you get used to using a Unix based OS, going back to windows is like a step down.

 

OSX Impresses me -- I get the Unix based OS, along with one of the best GUIs. I love Linux, would use it over Windows any day, but OSX might change all of that -- IF they make it available. I will not buy a Mactel system from Apple. I don't want to get burned again by getting locked into a proprietary closed system like I did with the three Macs I owned from 1995 - 2002

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is why I speculate that Apple will get a lot of people from the Linux camp who are attracted to a good looking BSD Unix based Operating system. Once you get used to using a Unix based OS, going back to windows is like a step down.

 

OSX Impresses me -- I get the Unix based OS, along with one of the best GUIs. I love Linux, would use it over Windows any day, but OSX might change all of that -- IF they make it available. I will not buy a Mactel system from Apple. I don't want to get burned again by getting locked into a proprietary closed system like I did with the three Macs I owned from 1995 - 2002

 

I have a OSx86 partition on my hard drive but I still prefer linux over OS X. OS X's potential as a unix based OS for the masses as a direct competitor to windows is what appeals to me. KDE is my favorite desktop environment and I have found that kubuntu with the ubuntu "human" color scheme is much more asthetically pleasing than the default kde blue.

 

snapshot20zx.th.jpg

 

oh sorry for all those typos earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a OSx86 partition on my hard drive but I still prefer linux over OS X. OS X's potential as a unix based OS for the masses as a direct competitor to windows is what appeals to me. KDE is my favorite desktop environment and I have found that kubuntu with the ubuntu "human" color scheme is much more asthetically pleasing than the default kde blue.

 

snapshot20zx.th.jpg

 

oh sorry for all those typos earlier.

 

Nice one, but imho kde is still miles behind the functionality of X. Good looking is one thing, but try to drag some plain marked MS Word text simply on the desk and see what happens in osx is another one.

 

Plus, you'll still have the advantage of unix. :D

 

Apple may, in fact, be using the community of enthusiasts to find the bugs in their new OS and crush them, leaving a truly user tested final product which is almost uncrackable.

 

"almost" is enough B)

 

Security is not a product, it is a process. The standard tpma = product while hacking = a process.

 

So tpma is not security. But it's secure they'll hack it :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...