Jump to content
45 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...

Xeon E5-1650v2 @ 3,5GHz (turbo 3.9 GHz) and Asus GTX650 - OSX 10.9.2

 

CPU (6 cores/12 threads): 960

1 core: 138

 

OpenGL:

60.64  with GTX650

79.93  with Sapphire HD6850

Oh yes i know that the comparison its completely different, sorry.

this is the windows bench XD

2upbrkh.png

 

but i have found that heaven benchmark on OsX and OpenGL gives better frame rates and i think its even better. (just my opinion)

 

this is a screen with everything maxed out...

Schermata+2014-03-23+alle+17.00.02.png

Your CPU- and OpenGL Cinebench scores on OS X are too low. Scoring lower on OS X is expected but your OpenGL performance shouldn't be cut in half.

 

It's possible that incorrectly- or not at all configured power management is holding it back.

Thanks :)

 

4770k at stock speeds..and stock gpu drivers..not from Nvidia..

And like Gringo Vermelho explains gpu running at stock OC speed.

 

Believe me it's because of CPU.

 

My PC:

Stock i5-3570K GTX660 Cinebench GPU ~60 CPU 484 pkt

i5-3570K@43:43:42:41 Cinebench GPU ~72 CPU 557 pkt

  • 2 weeks later...

Something is wrong here.my gtx660 scores 100+ fps with the same drivers

 

Here is something wrong, too. I get even less FPS with a Titan, 62(!) to pe precise - but 82 in Windows. On the other hand in Unigine Heaven OS X and Win scores are almost identical. Also noticed that Cinebench does not fully ramp up my clocks, while unigine does. Looks like Cinebench is not able to fully leverage these drivers in combo with the GK110 chips - or maybe a bug in the drivers itself.

Something is wrong here.my gtx660 scores 100+ fps with the same drivers

I know that and I think It's because of your newer CPU - Intel 4000 series and probably faster PCIE slot of your motherboard. If there is another reason and solution to that let me know ;)

×
×
  • Create New...