mm67 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 7870 XT at stock speed and i7-3770K at 4.5 GHz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbeepp Posted October 4, 2013 Author Share Posted October 4, 2013 I've disabled beam sync with Quartz Debug and my GPU score went from 59 fps to 79 fps. That's 20 fps increase! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe75 Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 sudo defaults write /Library/Preferences/com.apple.windowserver Compositor -dict deferredUpdates 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbeepp Posted January 29, 2014 Author Share Posted January 29, 2014 GAINWARD GTX 680 PHANTOM 4GB on Mavericks (10.9.1) and Mountain Lion - 75 fps How's that possible? Musicode's GTX 660 is much faster! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nubira Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 OpenGl 36.18 fps CPU 459 cb Asus P6T-SE i7 930 cpu Geforce GTX 650 Gonna try see what I score with my Quo Mobo i7 3770k and gtx 660 and get back later. quo mobo ga gtx 660 2 gig cpu 675 cb open gl 69.79 fps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdv Posted April 28, 2014 Share Posted April 28, 2014 Xeon E5-1650v2 @ 3,5GHz (turbo 3.9 GHz) and Asus GTX650 - OSX 10.9.2 CPU (6 cores/12 threads): 960 1 core: 138 OpenGL: 60.64 with GTX650 79.93 with Sapphire HD6850 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maximus Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JahStories Posted May 2, 2014 Share Posted May 2, 2014 My 780 doesn't seems so fast with this bench, but it run crysis3 with better frame rate... wtf?? (cpu not over clocked with web drivers) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gringo Vermelho Posted May 2, 2014 Share Posted May 2, 2014 There is no comparison. Crysis 3 does not: -run on OS X -use OpenGL If you want to compare, run the Windows version of Cinebench. It's in your Cinebench folder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfesq Posted May 2, 2014 Share Posted May 2, 2014 Feeling pretty limp. Yet, it does everything I want it to. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JahStories Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 Oh yes i know that the comparison its completely different, sorry. this is the windows bench XD but i have found that heaven benchmark on OsX and OpenGL gives better frame rates and i think its even better. (just my opinion) this is a screen with everything maxed out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gringo Vermelho Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 Your CPU- and OpenGL Cinebench scores on OS X are too low. Scoring lower on OS X is expected but your OpenGL performance shouldn't be cut in half. It's possible that incorrectly- or not at all configured power management is holding it back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JahStories Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 thats why i was expecting to have higher scores, i think that i need to fix the power management, even overclock seems effect-less on osx... i'll investigate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oswaldini Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 Thanks 4770k at stock speeds..and stock gpu drivers..not from Nvidia.. And like Gringo Vermelho explains gpu running at stock OC speed. Believe me it's because of CPU. My PC: Stock i5-3570K GTX660 Cinebench GPU ~60 CPU 484 pkt i5-3570K@43:43:42:41 Cinebench GPU ~72 CPU 557 pkt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankylan Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 My 3 year old hackintosh 3,41 GHz Intel Core i7 - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST - OS X 10.8.5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JahStories Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 i've redownloaded cinebench, but when i try to launch it it opens cinema4d (that i've not installed) instead and with a lot of errors... any tip? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbeepp Posted May 19, 2014 Author Share Posted May 19, 2014 Results after the latest upgrade (10.9.3) with Nvidia drivers. GPU - GTX 780 CPU - i7-2700K@4.5GHz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haxzion Posted May 19, 2014 Share Posted May 19, 2014 Results after the latest upgrade (10.9.3) with Nvidia drivers. GPU - GTX 780 CPU - i7-2700K@4.5GHz Something is wrong here.my gtx660 scores 100+ fps with the same drivers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankiee Posted May 19, 2014 Share Posted May 19, 2014 Something is wrong here.my gtx660 scores 100+ fps with the same drivers Here is something wrong, too. I get even less FPS with a Titan, 62(!) to pe precise - but 82 in Windows. On the other hand in Unigine Heaven OS X and Win scores are almost identical. Also noticed that Cinebench does not fully ramp up my clocks, while unigine does. Looks like Cinebench is not able to fully leverage these drivers in combo with the GK110 chips - or maybe a bug in the drivers itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbeepp Posted May 20, 2014 Author Share Posted May 20, 2014 Something is wrong here.my gtx660 scores 100+ fps with the same drivers I know that and I think It's because of your newer CPU - Intel 4000 series and probably faster PCIE slot of your motherboard. If there is another reason and solution to that let me know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts