Jump to content
30960 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Badruzeus said:

Sorry, I meant this one. Seems not updated since 2 years ago, but I got it working till 10.14.x

Screenshot 16.png

 

unfortunately, DNSCrypt can't help me. i need to use VPN. i now can access sf from only VPN server(japan, or other country) :(

2 hours ago, Sherlocks said:

in korea, sourceforge blocked korea IP and access. i can't access sourceforge site without VPN(other country). it's so sad. i don't know why they blocked korea IP.

나의 SM-N960N 의 Tapatalk에서 보냄
 

 

Unfortunately, because of large amounts of spam coming from korea many sites are blocking korean IP addresses. Seems quite brutal for source forge but do you still have access to other similar type sites, like github?

 
Unfortunately, because of large amounts of spam coming from korea many sites are blocking korean IP addresses. Seems quite brutal for source forge but do you still have access to other similar type sites, like github?
hi apianti.
recently i change asus wifi router rt-ac66u to ac rt68u. first i suspected router issue. but most of korean people suffered this issue for only sf.

except only sf, i don't have problem to access source site(github and etc)

나의 SM-N960N 의 Tapatalk에서 보냄

6 minutes ago, Sherlocks said:

hi apianti.
recently i change asus wifi router rt-ac66u to ac rt68u. first i suspected router issue. but most of korean people suffered this issue for only sf.

except only sf, i don't have problem to access source site(github and etc)

나의 SM-N960N 의 Tapatalk에서 보냄
 

 

I expect that sourceforge was maybe being barraged by korean traffic so it had no choice but to block an entire regional subnet of IP addresses. May even be attacks that are not originating in korea but those IP addresses have now been deemed as compromised by sourceforge's firewall/filtering.

 

EDIT: Maybe put in a support ticket and see why?

Edited by apianti
19 hours ago, apianti said:
 
I expect that sourceforge was maybe being barraged by korean traffic so it had no choice but to block an entire regional subnet of IP addresses. May even be attacks that are not originating in korea but those IP addresses have now been deemed as compromised by sourceforge's firewall/filtering.
 
EDIT: Maybe put in a support ticket and see why?

thank you for explanation.
as result, if i need to commit, i always use VPN :(

나의 SM-N960N 의 Tapatalk에서 보냄

 

EDIT1

best way is TouchVPN.

it's a simple UI. and can find app from appstore.

Edited by Sherlocks
2 hours ago, meaganmargaret said:

UEFI Shell tip:

 

It is important to be able to type a colon for file management purposes.  The only answer I've found is to use an older Mac wired keyboard.   Wired windows keyboards, wireless keyboards don't work.   The only solution for me was to use the full size wired Apple keyboard.

What are you talking about?? I use Wired Windows Keyboard, and i can type "colon" in UEFI Shell

Edited by Andres ZeroCross
14 hours ago, meaganmargaret said:

UEFI Shell tip:

 

It is important to be able to type a colon for file management purposes.  The only answer I've found is to use an older Mac wired keyboard.   Wired windows keyboards, wireless keyboards don't work.   The only solution for me was to use the full size wired Apple keyboard.

 

Actually i use usb full apple keyboard and i can't type colon !

I have a wireless usb 3.0 keyboard and have no problem in the shell. Try using one of the other shell variations. It may be a limitation of your firmware or the keyboard as well since the simple text input protocol doesn't have shift/alt/control/etc key support so it relies on the driver. If the driver doesn't properly check whether the shift key is pressed to alter the character that is retrieved from the keyboard then it will just use the character represented by the key scan code. The keyboard may also be to blame by having a different scan code for keys, especially if it is not an ANSI english keyboard.

 

EDIT: You can also try using either the ps2 keyboard driver from edk2, or the usb keyboard driver from clover or unmodified from edk2. Though if you are legacy booting you already have the clover modified one.

Edited by apianti

Uhm...guys? Is this intended? Cause it looks like a bug to me... Looks like VBoxHfs-64.uefi is present as both Mandatory and non-mandatory driver.

 

My guess is that it should probably be removed from non-mandatory...?

 

Point is, I can't build Clover anymore due to that error. If there is something I've missed, please, let me know.

 

2115821658_Screenshot2019-05-06at13_19_17.png.1eee70800bcb751fe4e1f301009b3c2a.png

Edited by arsradu
  • Like 1
On 5/6/2019 at 12:19 PM, arsradu said:

Uhm...guys? Is this intended? Cause it looks like a bug to me... Looks like VBoxHfs-64.uefi is present as both Mandatory and non-mandatory driver.

 

My guess is that it should probably be removed from non-mandatory...?

 

Point is, I can't build Clover anymore due to that error. If there is something I've missed, please, let me know.

 

2115821658_Screenshot2019-05-06at13_19_17.png.1eee70800bcb751fe4e1f301009b3c2a.png

 

 

I don't have this problem with both edk2 and udk2018 script. Which one do you use?

2 hours ago, Matgen84 said:

I don't have this problem with both edk2 and udk2018 script. Which one do you use?

 

Well, the same one I've always used (attached)... And I'm using UDK2018. Not sure what changed and where. Which one are you using? :)) Also, is this with a clean environment?

CloverNew

Edited by arsradu

I see no problem

total 43360
drwxr-xr-x  13 sergey  staff      442 May  7 21:28 .
drwxr-xr-x  15 sergey  staff      510 May  7 21:28 ..
drwxr-xr-x   5 sergey  staff      170 May  7 21:28 CloverCD
drwxr-xr-x   3 sergey  staff      102 May  7 21:28 CloverISO-4928
-rw-r--r--   1 sergey  staff  2882689 May  7 21:28 CloverISO-4928.tar.lzma
-rw-r--r--@  1 sergey  staff  9467800 May  7 21:28 Clover_v2.4k_r4928.pkg
-rw-r--r--   1 sergey  staff       68 May  7 21:28 Clover_v2.4k_r4928.pkg.md5
-rw-r--r--   1 sergey  staff  9385613 May  7 21:28 Clover_v2.4k_r4928.zip
drwxr-xr-x   3 sergey  staff      102 May  7 21:26 Resources
drwxr-xr-x   6 sergey  staff      204 May  7 21:27 build
drwxr-xr-x   3 sergey  staff      102 May  7 21:28 i386
drwxr-xr-x   3 sergey  staff      102 May  7 21:28 package
drwxr-xr-x   6 sergey  staff      204 May  7 21:27 utils
done!

 

6 minutes ago, Slice said:

I see no problem


total 43360
drwxr-xr-x  13 sergey  staff      442 May  7 21:28 .
drwxr-xr-x  15 sergey  staff      510 May  7 21:28 ..
drwxr-xr-x   5 sergey  staff      170 May  7 21:28 CloverCD
drwxr-xr-x   3 sergey  staff      102 May  7 21:28 CloverISO-4928
-rw-r--r--   1 sergey  staff  2882689 May  7 21:28 CloverISO-4928.tar.lzma
-rw-r--r--@  1 sergey  staff  9467800 May  7 21:28 Clover_v2.4k_r4928.pkg
-rw-r--r--   1 sergey  staff       68 May  7 21:28 Clover_v2.4k_r4928.pkg.md5
-rw-r--r--   1 sergey  staff  9385613 May  7 21:28 Clover_v2.4k_r4928.zip
drwxr-xr-x   3 sergey  staff      102 May  7 21:26 Resources
drwxr-xr-x   6 sergey  staff      204 May  7 21:27 build
drwxr-xr-x   3 sergey  staff      102 May  7 21:28 i386
drwxr-xr-x   3 sergey  staff      102 May  7 21:28 package
drwxr-xr-x   6 sergey  staff      204 May  7 21:27 utils
done!

 

 

Yeah, everything looks fine in your case. 

 

Then it's probably just me... But I can't figure out what am I missing here... It's the same script I've always used. And this is actually the first time I'm encountering this issue...

 

Hmm... which Xcode version are you using? Are you still on High Sierra?

 

I doubt this is an Xcode issue... But then again, we've seen many weird issues in the past that were caused by that. So, I wouldn't be surprised if this is another one of those cases. Right now, I'm on Xcode 10.2.1.

 

If you think it could be Xcode, I can try to get an older version (such as 10.1) and see if that still occurs.

 

Also, I think it might be interesting to see how does it work if I'm trying to force it to build a specific version. Such as 4921 for example. Same environment, of course. Same Xcode. Just a different revision.

 

I'll let you know. :)

Edited by arsradu
7 minutes ago, vector sigma said:

Fine here

Is bash the stock one?


echo $BASH_VERSION

 result:


3.2.57(1)-release

 

 

 

Same here.

 

1945849698_Screenshot2019-05-07at21_51_19.thumb.png.9f7fa4412facbcba853d11ce46e43d6f.png

 

Also, I can build 4291 just fine. I'll try 4293... Maybe there's something in that commit that it doesn't like.

 

One thing I've noticed with build 4291. The name is different.

676635730_Screenshot2019-05-07at21_53_15.thumb.png.91cb48a067c74fcb69f2929a4e6e385a.png

 

Edited by arsradu
6 minutes ago, vector sigma said:

Using USE_APPLE_HFSPLUS_DRIVER?

 

Bingo! Indeed, I am using HFSPlus. But...does it check for that before it makes the build? Cause it didn't seem to do that with previous versions. Is this something new?

 

Also, 4923 displays the same error which seems to be caused by the same name... but I'm guessing it's not...caused by that? Since Slice was able to build the latest version with no issues?

 

I'm guessing there's something with commit 4923 that causes this. Maybe only when there's HFSPlus driver... But again, we're not talking about installing the build here. Just...creating it in the first place. If there's a check for that during this step, I wasn't aware of it. Of course, I could be wrong.

Edited by arsradu
4 minutes ago, arsradu said:

 

Bingo! Indeed, I am using HFSPlus. But...does it check for that before it makes the build? Cause it didn't seem to do that with previous versions. Is this something new?

This must be related to a very old commit, but anyway if you want use that functionality you have to ensure that 

Clover/FileSystems/HFSPlus/X64/HFSPlus.efi

exists :)

EDIT

probably VBoxHfs will be copied anyway and a change will be required, but this is another story.

2 minutes ago, vector sigma said:

This must be related to a very old commit, but anyway if you want use that functionality you have to ensure that 


Clover/FileSystems/HFSPlus/X64/HFSPlus.efi

exists :)

 

Wait. I'm using HFSPlus in the sense that I've got it under Clover/CloverUEFIDrivers on the EFI partition. :)) Not that I'm using it to build Clover. That's what I was trying to say before. I wasn't aware that there's a function that checks what you have in your EFI folder before building Clover. :)) If there isn't, then this is not the case we're talking about.

 

And, as I said, building works perfectly fine with 4921, with the exact same setup.

6 minutes ago, arsradu said:

 

Wait. I'm using HFSPlus in the sense that I've got it under Clover/CloverUEFIDrivers on the EFI partition. :)) Not that I'm using it to build Clover. That's what I was trying to say before. I wasn't aware that there's a function that checks what you have in your EFI folder before building Clover. :)) If there isn't, then this is not the case we're talking about.

 

And, as I said, building works perfectly fine with 4921, with the exact same setup.

Doesn't check if exist in your ESP in fact, but we're not talking about building Clover?

I mean that if you pass -DUSE_APPLE_HFSPLUS_DRIVER ...it expect to find Clover/FileSystems/HFSPlus/X64/HFSPlus.efi... in the source code directory.. otherwise Vboxhfs will be copied..

Edited by vector sigma
Just now, vector sigma said:

Doesn't check if exist in your ESP in fact, but we're not talking about building Clover?

 

We are. That's the thing. I don't want it to build Clover with HFSPlus already included. I can add it myself once it's built. I just want it to build it. :)) It doesn't matter what I have in ESP.

 

And looking at commit 4923 I'm guessing some of that might be causing some of the drivers to have a duplicated name...which might cause the error? I don't know. I might be talking stupid here. But...I don't see why it would show that error with build 4923 (which it does indeed looks like it's trying to build two drivers with the same identical name) and not with 4921 (where it builds the VBoxHfs driver without the "-64" part). 

 

1764849128_Screenshot2019-05-07at22_19_26.thumb.png.763ed687ed4aa50106bec36d26f36f60.png

Just now, arsradu said:

 

We are. That's the thing. I don't want it to build Clover with HFSPlus already included. I can add it myself once it's built. I just want it to build it. :)) It doesn't matter what I have in ESP.

 

And looking at commit 4923 I'm guessing some of that might be causing some of the drivers to have a duplicated name...which might cause the error? I don't know. I might be talking stupid here. But...I don't see why it would show that error with build 4923 (which it does indeed looks like it's trying to build two drivers with the same identical name) and not with 4921 (where it builds the VBoxHfs driver without the "-64" part). 

 

1764849128_Screenshot2019-05-07at22_19_26.thumb.png.763ed687ed4aa50106bec36d26f36f60.png

Yes can be, but I though you find the culprit by using USE_APPLE_HFSPLUS_DRIVER. You said "Bingo" Lol

 

1 minute ago, vector sigma said:

Yes can be, but I though you find the culprit by using USE_APPLE_HFSPLUS_DRIVER. You said "Bingo" Lol

 

 

Misunderstanding on my side... And lucky coincidence, I guess...? :))) Cause I actually do have HFSPlus in ESP.

 

Sorry, my bad. :) I hope it's all clear now. At least for this part of the problem. :))

  • Haha 1
3 minutes ago, arsradu said:

 

Misunderstanding on my side... And lucky coincidence, I guess...? :))) Cause I actually do have HFSPlus in ESP.

 

Sorry, my bad. :) I hope it's all clear now. At least for this part of the problem. :))

Found the problem, and is not a problem with Clover. Go there: https://github.com/acidanthera/AppleSupportPkg/releases

and download latest release.... it contains VBoxHfs.efi:hysterical::hysterical:

512366948_Schermata2019-05-07alle21_35_34.png.78461de2fe891902f483c40065a4285e.png

  • Haha 2
×
×
  • Create New...