theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 No issues with ctf_insert missing? It's defined in MakeDefs.cmd... Here the vanilla also compiles just fine just by using shantonu's instructions, Andy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Rampagedev also prefer Asus, and called my preference for Gigabyte boards "kook-aid from the 'other site'", lol. Anyway, back on topic, did you see my second log? It's right above! Hmm... seems to be -Werror issues... I'll check... Seems to be warnings treated as errors... Hang on, post test3 soon EDIT: Ok... -Wcast-align removed and also -Werror. Apple TextEdit issues fixed („ -> ") @Theconnactic: Test 3 to build SinetekBronzovkAnVoodoo_MavTest3.diff.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 (edited) No issues with ctf_insert missing? It's defined in MakeDefs.cmd... i don't see problem ctf_insert with compiling xnu ! I'm don't delete "-Werror" in Makeinc.def ! But in terminal normal working tool "ctf_insert" Edited October 24, 2013 by Bronya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 i don't see problem ctf_insert with compiled xnu ! I'm don't delete "-Werror" in Makeinc.def ! But in terminal normal working tool "ctf_insert" Cool. Didn't know it was standardly included EDIT: True, -Werror can be preserved but -Wcast-align is annoying with full patch... things like opemu increase cast alignment... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe75 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Nice to see so much activity here I miss the old amd days.. 64bit only kernel might fix graphics problems from 10.7-10.8 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Nice to see so much activity here I miss the old amd days.. 64bit only kernel might fix graphics problems from 10.7-10.8 Maybe but 10.8 kernel was also in general x86_64 only (64-Bit only). But some stuff may have been modded in the graphics kexts and frameworks. Successful AMD tests are needed in order to be able to check that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Cool. Didn't know it was standardly included EDIT: True, -Werror can be preserved but -Wcast-align is annoying with full patch... things like opemu increase cast alignment... Yes ! I fix opemu.c and cpuid and tsc !!! But i found problem for "blacklist" in IOCatalogue.c - because it is don't working and can getting panic ! I need fix for blacklistEnabled ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Yes ! I fix opemu.c and cpuid and tsc !!! But i found problem for "blacklist" in IOCatalogue.c - because it is don't working and can getting panic ! I need fix for blacklistEnabled ! Odd... we need to test this... Doesn't it skip the kexts the usual way? The code doesn't seem to have changed in any way... Needs check Gonna see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 @Theconnactic: Test 3 to build Failed again, but went farther than the anterior: log3.txt P.S.: it seems that's a simple single mistake in a printf function... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Odd... we need to test this... Doesn't it skip the kexts the usual way? The code doesn't seem to have changed in any way... Needs check Gonna see Yes i can skip "blacklist" . It is working normal . Then i need testing on Maverick . @Theconnactic, you should fix "printf(„Local APIC version" to -->"printf("Local APIC version" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 Okay, guys, here's our first: All credits to Andy Vandjick, and additional thanks to Bronzovka for the wrong character tip. My personal recommendation is to rename it as amd_kernel and thus boot with the flag amd_kernel. mach_kernel.zip 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Guys , here's our first! Beta version mach_kernel_10.9_rc1 !!! I need create file.diff , but no have time . it is soon . mach_kernel_10_9_rc1.zip 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mohamed Khairy Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Okay, guys, here's our first: All credits to Andy Vandjick, and additional thanks to Bronzovka for the wrong character tip. My personal recommendation is to rename it as amd_kernel and thus boot with the flag amd_kernel. panic and auto restart afer panic by 1 sec Guys , here's our first! Beta version mach_kernel_10.9_rc1 !!! I need create file.diff , but no have time . it is soon . mach_kernel_10_9_rc1.zip invalid kernel opcode 64 bit ...... -- is this also for phenom ii ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 panic and auto restart afer panic by 1 sec invalid kernel opcode 64 bit ...... -- is this also for phenom ii ? Thank for test ! It is i added for phenom ii , It is sse4_2 ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 Here also. Now testing Bronzovka's! P.S.: and sorry, but i posted the first one Expect that yours be the first one that actually works! P.S.: instant reboot after loading all the kexts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sannti Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 This kernel should work with my PC ? I mean it should support x4 955 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 both have pros and cons. On intel mine boots slow and no fx support however, all works including blacklist. Your kernel boots fast and has fx support however, 5 coreapps crash and no blacklist. Maybe combining our work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 gils83, it is problem in commpage_populate ... Andy Vandijck , I no have time for create file.diff , soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS01 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Hey... apple released the sources... Awesome... They must have read my post.... lol That's odd.. I thought we usually had a 2-3 week wait? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 (edited) I added "blacklist" in IOCatalogue.cpp and it is working "blacklist" ))). If "invalid kernel opcode 64 bit " - it is because don't working opemu.c ))))) . Because in Maverick 10.9 - secured . gils83, panic - it is leaf7 no support on amd . mach_kernel_10.9_rc1_fix.zip Edited October 25, 2013 by Bronya 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ira Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 I don't want to mess the topic but I need to say that I'm very happy and pleased to see you guys working on for the AMD support. Much respect, and remeber, if you guys need some test or log from my intel/via machine just ask me, I don't have Mavericks in this yet but will build a spare USB stick in to my other Intel machine so it will be ready to test from tomorrow I think... Again, much respect! Cheers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mohamed Khairy Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 I added "blacklist" in IOCatalogue.cpp and it is working "blacklist" ))). If "invalid kernel opcode 64 bit " - it is because don't support sysenter ))))) . In 10.9 only syscall64 , but why stop at launchd ? Maybe problem syscall64 ? gils83, panic - it is leaf7 no support on amd . mach_kernel_10.9_rc1_fix.zip don't know if you added support or not but by the way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 hmmm... I found in mp_desc.c deleted sysenter 32 bit ... only sysenter 64 bit ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlo_67 Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 pc signature, the same block, I prepared usb with Pandora, mach_kernel_10.9_rc1_fix.zip But I am confident hmmm... I found in mp_desc.c deleted sysenter 32 bit ... only sysenter 64 bit ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrApocalypse Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 Ok, stupid question. If I wanted to test a kernel, would it be best to attempt to upgrade to Mavericks, then swap the kernel before the reboot. Or just make USB Mavericks installer with the testing kernel on it, and see how far it gets? I know, stupid question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts