Jump to content
6414 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I'm modding my patches for current kernel.

Lots already done.

I also noticed I can apply my code signature patch perfectly to the new kernel...

So code signing... no problem ;)

EDIT: NOTE: The kernel has totally no i386 (32-bit) code inside as Mavericks never had a 32-bit kernel.

So some patches that patched the 32-bit code are obsolete...

Yes i see ! :)

I same done . I need install Maverick 10.9 and test . Or you can test it is my kernel )))

  • Like 1

Yes i see ! :)

I same done . I need install Maverick 10.9 and test . Or you can test it is my kernel )))

I have an Intel CPU...

Did you also leave the needed support for booting Intel inside?

Unfortunetely no AMD here...

I have an Intel CPU...

Did you also leave the needed support for booting Intel inside?

Unfortunetely no AMD here...

 

Yes ! I adding Intel's and AMD , i don't delete Intel ! If Your processor Intel(via) , i can add for VIA . ! 

  • Like 3

Bronya and Andy, if it's not asking too much, could you include Atom CPUs support to the mix? :P

My patch supports this.

Unfortunetely cltools 5.0.1 only is not enough to build XNU.

I also need Xcode 5.0.1 itself but I don't have enough bandwidth so I can only do the download in the weekend with a friend.

The patch, however, is fully ported.

EDIT: Oh yes, AMD TLB fix is no longer set unless boot argument is given

It can be enabled with boot argument

-amdtlbfix

As most AMD cpus don't need this...

 

@Bronya: You might want this, and if you could build it, would be cool ;)

EDIT: Oops, wrong diff... see somewhat further (a couple posts ahead)...

Removed file...

  • Like 3

I'll build it! I'll do at once. Thank you very much!


P.S.: Same errors both in patching - lots of .s files wouldn't be found - and building the actual kernel. In fact, it behaves just like when i tried with rc_4.

 

P.P.S.: a screenshot of the errors while applying the patches: 

 

Screen Shot 2013-10-24 at 3.59.48 PM.png

  • Like 2

Is Mavericks required to build the kernel? I only have Lion on my machine.

 

I built it with Mavericks, but i really don't know. Will Xcode 5 run with Lion? If yes, i don't see why not...

I'll build it! I'll do at once. Thank you very much!

P.S.: Same errors both in patching - lots of .s files wouldn't be found - and building the actual kernel. In fact, it behaves just like when i tried with rc_4.

 

P.P.S.: a screenshot of the errors while applying the patches: 

 

attachicon.gifScreen Shot 2013-10-24 at 3.59.48 PM.png

Is 32-bit Intel patches... strange...

Diff needs cleaning...

Other than that, all ok if no patches fail (fuzz = ok)

EDIT: Can't be right patch...

I checked, see screenshot, you applied the wrong one...

It has no acpi_wakeup.s in the source diff...

Uploading again...  :o

Test the MavTest 1 diff...

It should apply cleanly...

 

EDIT2: Use test2 diff... below...

I built it with Mavericks, but i really don't know. Will Xcode 5 run with Lion? If yes, i don't see why not...

Xcode 5.0.1 will run on 10.8.X -> 10.9.X

post-100023-0-21020500-1382638911_thumb.png

Could you post me full log in text file format?

I'll fix them...

EDIT: I fixed the errors I saw in the screenshots.

Try this one...

EDIT2: Try test3 below...

Ok after downloading what have i to do?

Put the tools in /usr/bin.

Make sure you have Xcode 5.0.1 and command line tools for Xcode installed.

Apply patch.

Build the kernel

attachicon.giflog.txt

 

Here!

Ok... I think all is fine with the test2 diff..

They don't mention building ctf_insert from cctools.

Included in my ctf tools package...

Check MakeInc.cmds...

It is used there...

So also install ctf_insert (you can get it from my uploaded ctf tools)

ctf_insert --help
Usage: ctf_insert input [-arch <arch> <file>]... -o output

Which is used...

 

Put the tools in /usr/bin.

Make sure you have Xcode 5.0.1 and command line tools for Xcode installed.

Apply patch.

Build the kernel

I've Mounatin Lion now. Have i to put the tools in ML?

What patch? Sorry i'm learning about coding ^_^

Interesting !!!

I install command_line_tool_mountain_lion and xcode 5.0 .

AND 

I compiled :

1) cxxfilt-11 <-- ok !

2)dtrace-96 <-- ok !

3) build xnu 10.9  <-- ok !!!

:)

  • Like 2

When will you start working with kernel for Phenom II ?

 

Are you think i should buy new FX if i want get better working OS X ?

 The first question isn't polite to be asked to someone who's working at no charge for your benefit. The second i can answer myself: yes, FXs work better, but if you are to buy a new (and expensive) CPU, i suggest you spend a few more bucks and go straight with a future proof Gigabyte/Intel build.

Andy, the build failed again: log2.txt

  • Like 3

 The first question isn't polite to be asked to someone who's working at no charge for your benefit. The second i can answer myself: yes, FXs work better, but if you are to buy a new (and expensive) CPU, i suggest you spend a few more bucks and go straight with a future proof Gigabyte/Intel build.

True, but I prefer Asus + Intel (cheap i3-3320 IVY Bridge + Asus P8H77-M LE)

Rampagedev also prefer Asus, and called my preference for Gigabyte boards "kool-aid from the 'other site'", lol. Anyway, back on topic, did you see my second log? It's right above!

Interesting !!!

I install command_line_tool_mountain_lion and xcode 5.0 .

AND 

I compiled :

1) cxxfilt-11 <-- ok !

2)dtrace-96 <-- ok !

3) build xnu 10.9  <-- ok !!!

:)

No issues with ctf_insert missing?

It's defined in MakeDefs.cmd...

×
×
  • Create New...