Jump to content

Lenovo ThinkPad T420 with UEFI Only


K0gen
 Share

5,271 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Yeah, lost sound since latest Lilu.kext

 

Latest version 88KB Previous version 245KB ??? Thats some thinning down there....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, lost sound since latest Lilu.kext

 

Latest version 88KB Previous version 245KB ??? Thats some thinning down there....

 

sorry guys - i forgot update AppleALC kext - so I posted a new bundle with Lilu and AppleALC updated.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just test High Sierra Beta, and it got a sleep problem. When I close lid to sleep, If I use default hibernatemode (3), it goes to hibernation mode and can not start up. If I turn off hibernationmode (0), It just panic(cpu 2 caller 0xffffff800038a611): Kernel trap at... And want more things, It cosume a lot of cpu even in idle, and cost more RAM compare to Sierra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just test High Sierra Beta, and it got a sleep problem. When I close lid to sleep, If I use default hibernatemode (3), it goes to hibernation mode and can not start up. If I turn off hibernationmode (0), It just panic(cpu 2 caller 0xffffff800038a611): Kernel trap at... And want more things, It cosume a lot of cpu even in idle, and cost more RAM compare to Sierra

 

well resume from Hibernate (3) never worked as far as I know. have to change to mode 7.

 

but i use mode 0. it goes to sleep just fine - originally I did have KP on resume/wake from sleep. if i turn off the BT before sleep then no problem on wake. 

 

try this - if this is a fix, ie turn off BT... i am happy to share my sleepwatcher screens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well resume from Hibernate (3) never worked as far as I know. have to change to mode 7.

 

but i use mode 0. it goes to sleep just fine - originally I did have KP on resume/wake from sleep. if i turn off the BT before sleep then no problem on wake. 

 

try this - if this is a fix, ie turn off BT... i am happy to share my sleepwatcher screens.

I just cannot use hibernate mode 7: 

Usage pmset options

See pmset(1) for details 'man pmset'

 hibernatemode supports values of 0, 3, or 25. Whether or not a hiberna-

     tion image gets written is also dependent on the values of standby and

     autopoweroff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah you will have to write to the file directly.

 

see /Library/Preferences/com.apple.PowerManagement.<UID>.plist 

 

Dict {
    Battery Power = Dict {
        Hibernate Mode = 7
        Wake On AC Change = 0
        Wake On Clamshell Open = 1
        AutoPowerOff Delay = 0
        Standby Delay = 10800
        TTYSPreventSleep = 1
        TCPKeepAlivePref = 1
        Hibernate File = /var/vm/sleepimage
        Standby Enabled = 1
        AutoPowerOff Enabled = 0
    }

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

sudo /Applications/Install\ macOS\ High\ Sierra.app/Contents/Resources/createinstallmedia --volume /Volumes/clemacos --applicationpath /Applications/Install\ macOS\ High\ Sierra.app --nointeraction &&say Done

Yes. having an up to date Installation USB is aways a good idea. I upgraded my T420 without any issue by downloading and running it directly from the HD

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terminal command for install without filesystem upgrade for the final installer:

Code:
/Applications/Install\ macOS\ High\ Sierra.app/Contents/Resources/startosinstall --converttoapfs NO

Agree to the License Agreement and a reboot should start.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah you will have to write to the file directly.

 

see /Library/Preferences/com.apple.PowerManagement.<UID>.plist 

 

Dict {

    Battery Power = Dict {

        Hibernate Mode = 7

        Wake On AC Change = 0

        Wake On Clamshell Open = 1

        AutoPowerOff Delay = 0

        Standby Delay = 10800

        TTYSPreventSleep = 1

        TCPKeepAlivePref = 1

        Hibernate File = /var/vm/sleepimage

        Standby Enabled = 1

        AutoPowerOff Enabled = 0

    }

But when I open this file , there are unreadable characters 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes. everything works as before. the conversion does not mess with the other partition for windows. this is what my disk looks like now:

$ diskutil list
/dev/disk0 (internal, physical):
   #:                       TYPE NAME                    SIZE       IDENTIFIER
   0:      GUID_partition_scheme                        *512.1 GB   disk0
   1:                        EFI EFI                     209.7 MB   disk0s1
   2:                 Apple_APFS Container disk1         459.7 GB   disk0s2
   3:       Apple_KernelCoreDump                         655.4 MB   disk0s3
   4:       Microsoft Basic Data C                       50.6 GB    disk0s4
   5:           Windows Recovery                         995.1 MB   disk0s5
/dev/disk1 (synthesized):
   #:                       TYPE NAME                    SIZE       IDENTIFIER
   0:      APFS Container Scheme -                      +459.7 GB   disk1
                                 Physical Store disk0s2
   1:                APFS Volume macOS                   314.9 GB   disk1s1
   2:                APFS Volume Preboot                 18.5 MB    disk1s2
   3:                APFS Volume Recovery                520.0 MB   disk1s3
   4:                APFS Volume VM                      8.6 GB     disk1s4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone got the HDD in the ultra bay to work in HS? thought it was just a beta bug but it still is not readable in the final build.

yeah I had issues with the bay drive since Sierra sometime ago, so i gave up using it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

yes. everything works as before. the conversion does not mess with the other partition for windows. this is what my disk looks like now:

$ diskutil list
/dev/disk0 (internal, physical):
   #:                       TYPE NAME                    SIZE       IDENTIFIER
   0:      GUID_partition_scheme                        *512.1 GB   disk0
   1:                        EFI EFI                     209.7 MB   disk0s1
   2:                 Apple_APFS Container disk1         459.7 GB   disk0s2
   3:       Apple_KernelCoreDump                         655.4 MB   disk0s3
   4:       Microsoft Basic Data C                       50.6 GB    disk0s4
   5:           Windows Recovery                         995.1 MB   disk0s5
/dev/disk1 (synthesized):
   #:                       TYPE NAME                    SIZE       IDENTIFIER
   0:      APFS Container Scheme -                      +459.7 GB   disk1
                                 Physical Store disk0s2
   1:                APFS Volume macOS                   314.9 GB   disk1s1
   2:                APFS Volume Preboot                 18.5 MB    disk1s2
   3:                APFS Volume Recovery                520.0 MB   disk1s3
   4:                APFS Volume VM                      8.6 GB     disk1s4

sounds good.

Is it better, faster?

do you feel a difference in speed?

should I stay with HFS+ or should I convert to APFS?

Hard questions, but may be you have an opinion.

 

Thanks again for all your efforts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

verleinix - the performance of HFS seems to still be better according some benchmarks i read about. but i went with APFS on my SSD (on both my hack and real macbook)

 

superkwn - well i dont know about that. the TrackPad code logic is pretty much contained in one file - VoodooPS2SynapticsTouchPad.cpp - so one read that and then compile in DEBUG mode to print out values etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...