1167 replies to this topic

[arkoyd]

intel P4   2.4 gb @3.2 gb

msi 865pe

1gb  ram

video card  9600xt 128


result test 48.00

[GrandMasta]

http://ladd.dyndns.o...&setCookie=true

Pentium 4 3.2e Prescott @ 3.62Ghz - Still Finding Max OC
1MB L2 Cache, SSE3
512MB Mushkin 2-2-2-6 @ 226Mhz
Abit IC7 (i875)
Radeon 9800 Pro 256Mb Vesa 2.0
System HD Is WD Raptor 10000RPM SATA

55.99

[ferntex]

The user emm ask for some PPC mac score post...
My computer:
powerbook G4 1.33, 2 GB RAM

Results 51.25
System Info
Xbench Version 1.2
System Version 10.4.2 (8C46)
Physical RAM 2048 MB
Model PowerBook5,4
Processor PowerPC G4 @ 1.33 GHz
L1 Cache 32K (instruction), 32K (data)
L2 Cache 512K @ 1.33 GHz
Bus Frequency 167 MHz
Video Card ATY,RV360M11
Drive Type TOSHIBA MK6025GAS
CPU Test 51.25
GCD Loop 122.94 6.48 Mops/sec
Floating Point Basic 30.61 727.31 Mflop/sec
vecLib FFT 76.19 2.51 Gflop/sec
Floating Point Library 41.45 7.22 Mops/sec

[guido420]

Two Scores:  38.6  (Celeron D) 46.3  (P4 3.2G)

MOBO: AS ROCK Dual 915 (Socket 478)
CPU: 1) 3.06GHz Celeron D
        2) 3.2GHz P4
RAM: 1GB PC3200 (2x512MB)
Video: OnBoard Intel 900
Hard Drive: Maxtor 40GB U133 7200 (only 6GB Partition)

Just an out of the box POS Board and a standard Windows DD Image on a native install.

Haven't tweaked it at all except the Kernel_Task fix and Platform=x86.

Good job Guys for all the work and info......

Peace

Guido

[ashd]

Processor: AMD64 3000+ (Venice)
Ram: 896mb
Gfx Card: Radeon 9600 Pro
Results: 23.79

With Maxxus' 0.4 patch; i have SSE3 but Rosetta doesn't seem to work without the patch.  

I was running Safari, iChat, iTunes and TomatoTorrent at the time.

Attached Files

•  xbench.txt   1.45K   167 downloads

[macgirl]

For SSE3 Rosetta is not patched, waht is patched is the TPM check.

[ripprasternode]

Here's a good comparison for you, my mac mini

Mac Mini G4 1.4
512mb

Results 40.37

I'm getting an i915 775 board next week. All the onboard gear seems OSx86 OK, I look forward to the results.
http://www.gigabyte....-8I915ME-GL.htm

Attached Files

•  macmini14.txt   1.73K   187 downloads

[foureight84]

Vaio V505EC

Results 33.70
System Info  
Xbench Version  1.2
System Version  10.4.1 (8B1025)
Physical RAM  512 MB
Model  ADP2,1
Drive Type  TOSHIBA MK6021GAS
CPU Test 19.67
GCD Loop 76.48 4.03 Mops/sec
Floating Point Basic 33.74 801.56 Mflop/sec
vecLib FFT 7.10 234.10 Mflop/sec
Floating Point Library 50.70 8.83 Mops/sec
Thread Test 55.40
Computation 42.51 861.22 Kops/sec, 4 threads
Lock Contention 79.51 3.42 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
Memory Test 49.65
System 49.06
  Allocate 118.38 434.73 Kalloc/sec
  Fill 47.01 2285.82 MB/sec
  Copy 31.82 657.26 MB/sec
Stream 50.26
  Copy 45.47 939.10 MB/sec
  Scale 45.87 947.70 MB/sec
  Add 56.10 1195.04 MB/sec
  Triad 55.63 1190.15 MB/sec
Quartz Graphics Test 90.68
Line 74.64 4.97 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
Rectangle 84.76 25.30 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
Circle 99.69 8.13 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
Bezier 98.50 2.48 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
Text 102.47 6.41 Kchars/sec
OpenGL Graphics Test 25.36
Spinning Squares 25.36 32.18 frames/sec
User Interface Test 64.33
Elements 64.33 295.25 refresh/sec
Disk Test 25.84
Sequential 47.08
  Uncached Write 38.76 23.80 MB/sec [4K blocks]
  Uncached Write 40.43 22.88 MB/sec [256K blocks]
  Uncached Read 79.25 23.19 MB/sec [4K blocks]
  Uncached Read 45.84 23.04 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Random 17.80
  Uncached Write 6.20 0.66 MB/sec [4K blocks]
  Uncached Write 36.32 11.63 MB/sec [256K blocks]
  Uncached Read 50.00 0.35 MB/sec [4K blocks]
  Uncached Read 63.29 11.74 MB/sec [256K blocks]

[NickDG]

Dell Optiplex GX280  <- Runs very nicely
P4 (SSE3) 2.8 Ghz 512MB DDR
SATA Hard drive

Score: 39.16

PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0 ghz  <- My workhorse
1.5 GB DDR
SATA Hard drive

Score: 84.55

Both attached.

Attached Files

•  Dell_GX280.txt   1.49K   138 downloads
•  PowerMac_G5_Dual_2.0_ghz.txt   1.67K   221 downloads

[firebush05]

AMD 3000+ (winchester, SSE2) @ 2.31ghz
1GB 400DDR
Soltek SL-K890pro-939
6600GT
OSX installed on its own 7200rpm 20gb HD.

Results 59.97
Loving it so far!

EDIT:  I got it going slightly faster....61.73
 AMD3000_.txt   1.5K   221 downloads
 Updated_score.txt   1.5K   181 downloads

[HoZy]

Amd64 s939 Winchester 3200+ 2.0ghz @ 2.45ghz
Msi K8n Neo2 Platinum M/board
1g pc4000 Ram
Radeon 9600 pro
WD Cavier 80Gb H/drive

75.44

[johnnybluejeans]

NickDG, on Aug 31 2005, 06:49 PM, said:

PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0 ghz  <- My workhorse
1.5 GB DDR
SATA Hard drive

Score: 84.55

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Further proof that Xbench is a completely useless metric.

[Sam0r]

I was at an apple store today, near where I live.

I did an Xbench of the new mini mac's that were there.

Check these results out.

Attached Files

•  xbench_mac_mini_score.rtf   1.98K   969 downloads

[selektor]

Just for a laugh:

Specs

PowerMac 7500 G3/500
Rage 128 Pro
Onboard SCSI
Mac OS X 10.3.9

Score:  5.62    



I don't know about Xbench being a "useless metric" but I can say that this score truely reflects how much OS X sucks on this Old World Mac.

Attached Files

•  PM7500_G3500.txt   1.59K   109 downloads

[firebush05]

selektor, on Sep 1 2005, 10:00 PM, said:

Just for a laugh:

Specs

PowerMac 7500 G3/500
Rage 128 Pro
Onboard SCSI
Mac OS X 10.3.9

Score:  5.62   



I don't know about Xbench being a "useless metric" but I can say that this score truely reflects how much OS X sucks on this Old World Mac.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

LOL.  My G3/500imac got a little over 9....ssllooww .  But the funny thing is I used it more than my brand new PC running windows.  The PC was a nintendo until osx86!

[Sam0r]

firebush05, on Sep 2 2005, 07:49 AM, said:

LOL.  My G3/500imac got a little over 9....ssllooww .  But the funny thing is I used it more than my brand new PC running windows.  The PC was a nintendo until osx86!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

At least you can play games on a nintendo  

I'll post a xbench of my 266mhz iMac oc'd to 300mhz later  

[NickDG]

johnnybluejeans, on Sep 1 2005, 12:27 PM, said:

Further proof that Xbench is a completely useless metric.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I agree.  The G5 is quite faster than the Dell.  The score should be well into the 100's.  Just look at the CPU score for the G5.

[Wingen]

Athlon64 3200+
1 GB PC3200 RAM 2.5-3-3-8
80 GB IDE U100

that's the relevant info, I guess.

Attached Files

•  Untitled.txt   1.49K   419 downloads

[kresh]

Original Mac mini 1.25Ghz OverClocked to 1.5Ghz
1GB Ram - PC3200
Original 4200 rpm Drive (TOSHIBA MK4025GAS)
ATI Radeon 9200 (249.75Mhz), overclocked to 276.75Mhz (Using ATIccelerator II)
32MB Vram (190.13Mhz), overclocked to 210.38Mhz (Using ATIccelerator II)

44.60  - Using ATIccelerator II - 5 test average
42.39  - No Video Acceleration - 5 test average


edit: spelling

[firebush05]

Sam0r, on Sep 2 2005, 07:28 AM, said:

At least you can play games on a nintendo 

I'll post a xbench of my 266mhz iMac oc'd to 300mhz later 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Yep, when I want to play game, or just to dabble around with spy/adware I just boot into Wintendows.   Whats really sad is your screaming fast OC'd 266mhz is probably more useful than Windows on my new PC/Mac!    

Here's a question for everyone... my xbench scores beat a mac mini by around 25points.  But, my cpu scores were lower than the mini because of this test -> vecLib FFT.  The mac mini had a score of 82.90 (2.73 Gflop/sec), and my score was 13.77 (454.22 Mflop/sec).  They are two very different chips, but what causes the difference in the numbers, whats that benchmarks relevance to speed, and if it is relevant.. is there something driver wise slowing it down?

Edit:  forgot..   my proc=AMD3000/2.31Ghz      Vs.     MacMini proc= G4/1.42Ghz.