Jump to content

Adobe: "Universal? What's That?"


Swad

Oh, Adobe. There was this memo floating around last June – you may or may not have seen it, it didn’t get much press – about how this tiny computer company called Apple was going to switch their processor architecture. Not a big deal, I can understand how you could have missed it…

 

…but then, wait, weren’t you at WWDC? Didn’t you give a press conference shortly thereafter? It would seem that since you had a good half-year’s head start, you could have at least given the Mac community something universal to whet our appetites. Well, there’s the Lightroom beta of course, but I know I can’t wait to use it with a beachball-ridden Photoshop.

 

Ok, well, maybe I’m being too hard on Adobe. I understand that they have a massive number of products that they would need to transition. But in light of their announcement yesterday that we may not see Universal apps like Photoshop, Dreamweaver, Fireworks, Illustrator, and the rest until 2007, it would seem that they have been nowhere to be found during the switch. Since Adobe knows that the millions of creatives who use Macs at work would at least need Photoshop, couldn’t they at least switch one or two apps over and then give us the suite next year?

 

In my opinion, there is no excuse for this. Their corporate line…

 

"As we've refined our software development process over the years, we've generally found that the most effective way for us to support these types of changes is to incorporate this testing into our regular development cycle. This enables us to advance our technology at the aggressive pace that our customers expect, while also adding support for significant new system configurations."

 

…doesn’t address the fact that as one of the world’s largest and most important software houses they had plenty of advance warning to at least prepare a universal Photoshop for MacWorld. I could even understand an interim universal release sometime in the next few months. But forcing Mac users to wait until the end of this year or the beginning of the next (at which point we’ll be using Leopard) essentially sends the message that we’re not all that important. And that’s a shame.


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



Once you use GIMP (which is free) you'll never go back to photoshop!

 

Gimp = Gnu Image Manipulation Something that starts with a P.

 

Install X code first if you don't already have it, then go to gimp.org or something like that and DON'T click on downloads (that link just has source), instead scrolldown to the three selections Widows, Mac, & Unix, thats where the already to go apps are.

 

 

 

For html someone needs to port notetab to mac, it has everything you need and not any more.

 

...and since it is small i think that would be easy to do but don't know for sure.

 

HAHAHA no-one could defend that interface.Gimpshop is worse.Are you a graphics professional?
Unlike photoshop it is intuitive and easy to use, you don't need to read a giant textbook to use it.

 

 

 

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For html someone needs to port notetab to mac, it has everything you need and not any more.

 

For html you need (believe it or not)...AppleWorks! As ridiculous as it might sound, it has that "export as HTML" option and it came free with the older consumer Macs (like the iMac G3 and G4). Plus, it has a lot of other modules, including the easiest database module I've ever used.

 

and btw, GraphicConverter is already a universal app and can handle 95% of the things Photoshop can. It's a lot cheaper too. Plus a goodly number of graphics professionals and page layout designers are still using G4 towers that boot in OS 9 (sounds silly, but it's true). If Adobe released a UB app, it automatically kills off 9 support. So it becomes a question of how to get the remaining stragglers onto OS X while not pissing them off by spending $125 in addition to the upgrade cost for Adobe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure Adobe's priority is Vista, then Mac Intel.

 

A new version of their software for Vista wouldn't require any substantial update from XP, and Vista won't be out till near the end of the year. Mac Intel WILL require a good bit of work, and is already here. Adobe clearly dropped the ball.

 

I see developers saying that "Apple said they weren't shipping machines till June". Actually, Apple said nothing of the kind. Steve Jobs said "by this time next year we will have machines in the marketplace". That means that they would be ready BEFORE June.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...