Jump to content
44 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

well I hope it is not 9A527, even tho it is good. I'd laugh it was 9b1 xD

You may have to laugh, I think you're close.

 

Current builds are 9Axxx, and the current builds of Tiger are 8Rxxxx

 

My guess is that, if convention holds, it will be 9R0001 or slightly higher allowing for RC candidate refreshes.

Current builds are 9Axxx, and the current builds of Tiger are 8Rxxxx

 

My guess is that, if convention holds, it will be 9R0001 or slightly higher allowing for RC candidate refreshes.

 

If they follow the convention, GM will be either 9AXXX or 9BXXX. Tiger Builds became four digits long, when they introduced Universal Builds.

 

Public Beta was 1H39 (Wikipedia)

10.0 was 4K78 through 4Q12 (10.0.4) (Wikipedia)

10.1 was 5G64 through 5S60 (10.1.5) (Wikipedia)

10.2 was 6C115 through 6R73 (10.2.8) (Wikipedia)

10.3 was 7B85 through 7W98 (10.3.9) (Wikipedia)

10.4 started with 8A428, split off at 8G32 (PPC) and 8G1152 (Intel) with 10.4.4

and is now at 8R218 (PPC) and 8R2218/8R2322 (Intel) (10.4.10) (Wikipedia)

 

9RXXX could be 10.5.7 or something. :(

If they follow the convention, GM will be either 9AXXX or 9BXXX. Tiger Builds became four digits long, when they introduced Universal Builds.

 

Public Beta was 1H39 (Wikipedia)

10.0 was 4K78 through 4Q12 (10.0.4) (Wikipedia)

10.1 was 5G64 through 5S60 (10.1.5) (Wikipedia)

10.2 was 6C115 through 6R73 (10.2.8) (Wikipedia)

10.3 was 7B85 through 7W98 (10.3.9) (Wikipedia)

10.4 started with 8A428, split off at 8G32 (PPC) and 8G1152 (Intel) with 10.4.4

and is now at 8S144 (PPC) and 8S2144 (Intel) (10.4.10) (Wikipedia)

 

9RXXX could be 10.5.7 or something. :(

Interesting,

 

I'd like to know then why my 10.4.10 says build 8R2322, it should be 8S something?

Interesting,

 

I'd like to know then why my 10.4.10 says build 8R2322, it should be 8S something?

 

Argh, got that wrong, sorry for the confusion. 8S something are the developer seeds for 10.4.11,

10.4.10 should be 8R218 for PPC and 8R2218 resp. 8R2322 for Intel. (got mislead by the wikipedia table)

Maybe Apple doesn't ship Leopard in october. Because according to the roadmap there should have been a final candidate in early september. And it's already mid september..

Nobody has ever said the roadmap was legit :D

 

It can be a pure creation, that roadmap is really not hard to imagine.

  • 1 month later...
×
×
  • Create New...