Jump to content
511 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

@laobamac_yyds Have the remaining OCLP Devs expressed any interest in formally welcoming you to the team?

 

EDIT: @dhinakg If you're following this at all, looks like you have a very capable developer who is more than happy to help.

Edited by deeveedee
  • Like 5
5 hours ago, deeveedee said:

@laobamac_yyds Have the remaining OCLP Devs expressed any interest in formally welcoming you to the team?

 

EDIT: @dhinakg If you're following this at all, looks like you have a very capable developer who is more than happy to help.

If given the opportunity, I would be happy to participate in this open-source project.

 

Unfortunately, I did not receive the invitation :)

  • Like 9
6 hours ago, laobamac_yyds said:

If given the opportunity, I would be happy to participate in this open-source project.

 

Unfortunately, I did not receive the invitation :)

The new that advances ...often scares us! :)

If I were you (with your skill in this field i mean) , I would remain independent and channel my skills towards the Hackintosh world in particular.
It won't last long (so they say), but at least we'll be able to use our top hacks as we do now for a while longer :) :)

 

Maybe, and here I would like to make a suggestion to the moderators and administrators of this forum, promote laobamac to Devs...
I think he deserves it, allowing all of us to have WiFi again...and more...before the indefinite time frame predicted in the past! :P

 

Edited by fabiosun
Edit Laobamac promotion! :)
  • Like 6
  • Thanks 2

Also some of us, cannot afford last Mac models, so they (including me here) want to have possibility to install Tahoe on an unsupported MacBook Pro. Anyway, Tahoe is the last macOS which can run on Intel Macs, supported or unsupported. That's why, I think laobamac's skills are good to do a refreshment to the long awaited official OCLP 3.00. 

Edited by XanthraX
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Friends, 26.4B2(25E5218f) until I released this information, there is still no suitable KDK. ( B1 is the same).

 

Once again, do not install any patches that require KDK before KDK is released, let alone try to use 26.3 KDK!

  • Like 3
2 minutes ago, laobamac_yyds said:

Friends, 26.4B2(25E5218f) until I released this information, there is still no suitable KDK. ( B1 is the same).

 

Once again, do not install any patches that require KDK before KDK is released, let alone try to use 26.3 KDK!

Hi @laobamac_yyds my friend, about mounting HFS+ disks, has Apple fixed this issue yet, or is it still the same? Thanks!! ;) 

  • Like 1
6 minutes ago, Max.1974 said:

Hi @laobamac_yyds my friend, about mounting HFS+ disks, has Apple fixed this issue yet, or is it still the same? Thanks!! ;) 

I'll burn an HFS+ test. Wait for me for a few minutes!

 

@Max.1974 I restarted the computer several times, but there was no error pop-up like Beta1. I think Apple has indeed fixed the problem of HFS+ mounting failure.

Edited by laobamac_yyds
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...