Jump to content

Open CORE Kernel & Kext patch for X99/X299 motherboard


Message added by fantomas

The contents of these post are outdated, all the XCPM patches for X99 and similar chipsets can be enabled within Kernel → Quirks section

435 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

@nmano This guide work for x79 and Sandy Bridge-E (i73930K)? How I can find the Cpuid1Dat and FakeCPUID for SandyBridge-E?

I would like to try your tutorial to see if I can get BS to run on x79 and Sandy Bridge-E. I still couldn't do it with Clover and OC.

5 hours ago, Vinicius P. Miranda said:

@nmano This guide work for x79 and Sandy Bridge-E (i73930K)? How I can find the Cpuid1Dat and FakeCPUID for SandyBridge-E?

I would like to try your tutorial to see if I can get BS to run on x79 and Sandy Bridge-E. I still couldn't do it with Clover and OC.

Deleting UNC0 from my DSDT helped me on my x79 with Sandy Bridge-E

  • Like 2
17 hours ago, Vinicius P. Miranda said:

@nmano This guide work for x79 and Sandy Bridge-E (i73930K)? How I can find the Cpuid1Dat and FakeCPUID for SandyBridge-E?

I would like to try your tutorial to see if I can get BS to run on x79 and Sandy Bridge-E. I still couldn't do it with Clover and OC.

 

Sandy Bridge -E, Ivy Bridge -E are natively supported so you don't 'have to spoof any cpuid, you only need some tunes for reserved memory in order to get your graphics working if you are gonna use IGPU

 

  • Like 1

I update XCPM 10.16 /11.0 Beta 10 (20A5395g)  X99/X299

Enjoy.

 

 

  • Like 3
On 10/20/2020 at 6:36 AM, Frankovich said:

Deleting UNC0 from my DSDT helped me on my x79 with Sandy Bridge-E

How do I do that? DSDT is not placed in OpenCore.

 

On 10/20/2020 at 6:24 PM, Cclown98 said:

 

Sandy Bridge -E, Ivy Bridge -E are natively supported so you don't 'have to spoof any cpuid, you only need some tunes for reserved memory in order to get your graphics working if you are gonna use IGPU

 

I tested the Dortania, Sanity Check tutorials, and several other variations, but I was unable to start BigSur.
The only thing that made Power Management work in Catalina correctly was to put the following:

1968118455_CapturadeTela2020-10-24s15_20_09.thumb.png.0ef8754e2078066a9074eecdd5f44526.png

 

Can you tell me if I have to change these values to work with BigSur?

I check 11.0.1 Kernel

Beta 11.0 & 11.0.1 XCPM are same.

Edited by nmano
  • Like 1
On 10/24/2020 at 9:22 PM, Vinicius P. Miranda said:

How do I do that? DSDT is not placed in OpenCore.

https://dortania.github.io/Getting-Started-With-ACPI/Manual/dump.html

You need to get your DSDT, delete UNC0 from it, add DSDT in ACPI folder and config

17 hours ago, AslashA said:

You have something wrong. Too few scores in the benchmark. I have with one processor 82х - Single-Core and 81xx - Multi-Core.

Try Geekbench 5.1.0 or Latest

Edited by nmano
1 hour ago, nmano said:

Try Geekbench 5.1.0 or Latest

I have version 5.2.3 .. Now did the test again.

 

I'm using emulation + AppleXcpmExtraMsrs in OpenCore and PMDrv.kext.

Screenshot 2020-11-02 at 16.07.18.png

I don't use the turbo boost unlock!

Edited by AslashA
  • Like 2
On 11/6/2020 at 9:22 PM, Vinicius P. Miranda said:

His is right. 2 processors do not double performance. This would be the ideal scenario, but it is not what happens in practice.

No. He also has few points in the single core.

MacOS Big Sur Version 11.0.1 (20B28) XCPM nothing change.

  • Thanks 1

ACPI Patch for X99/X299 to Big Sur

#Remove SSDT-UNC.aml

 

Comment  <->UNC0 _HID to XID X99/X299

Enabled    <->Yes

Find          <->554E4330 085F4849 44

Replace   <->554E4330 08584849 44

 

Comment  <->UNC1 _HID to XID X99/X299

Enabled    <->Yes

Find          <->554E4331 085F4849 44

Replace   <->554E4331 08584849 44

  • Like 1
8 hours ago, nmano said:

ACPI Patch for X99/X299 to Big Sur

#Remove SSDT-UNC.aml

 

Comment  <->UNC0 _HID to XID X99/X299

Enabled    <->Yes

Find          <->554E4330 085F4849 44

Replace   <->554E4330 08584849 44

 

Comment  <->UNC1 _HID to XID X99/X299

Enabled    <->Yes

Find          <->554E4331 085F4849 44

Replace   <->554E4331 08584849 44

 

Hi @nmano thank you for this. Would you mind confirming the objective of this patch please? Is this mandatory for the latest Big Sur update?

Thanks a lot 

  • Like 1
23 minutes ago, rvilbert said:

 

Hi @nmano thank you for this. Would you mind confirming the objective of this patch please? Is this mandatory for the latest Big Sur update?

Thanks a lot 

I try Gigabyte motherboard X99 & X299 Its work Big Sur.

1 час назад rvilbert сказал:

Благодарность @nmano У меня есть Asus X99 Deluxe с запущенной бета-версией Big Sur 11.0.1. Ты думаешь мне это нужно? Большое спасибо. Ура.

Если вам удалось установить OS X с флешки, то этот патч вам ни к чему.

К тому же это не новости - post-2183427

Edited by Антико
21 minutes ago, Антико said:

If you were able to install OS X from a flash drive , then you don't need this patch for nothing.

Thanks for the response. I actually was not able to install Big Sur from a flash drive but i took another path and installed it through a restore disk which ultimately gave me the same result. I have now a running Big Sur so happy with it. Cheers.

  • Like 1
On 11/12/2020 at 8:50 AM, nmano said:

I try Gigabyte motherboard X99 & X299 Its work Big Sur.

 

 

I installed the public release of Big Sur this morning. It works well. I'm very pleased! Thanks a lot to all this Insanely community and also big Credit to @MaLd0n who helped me a lot to get to this point. Cheers guys. Take care !

 

 

Screenshot 2020-11-13 at 11.05.02.png

27 minutes ago, NeXtor said:

Я пытаюсь выполнить обновление прямо из Catalina в подробном режиме. Он начинает загружаться, но в какой-то момент, когда появляется логотип Apple, и панель загрузки начинает заполняться, компьютер перезагружается. Помогите

there are a lot of problems with our boards, which loader you use.?

×
×
  • Create New...