Jump to content

[Guide] Mac OSX 10.12 and 10.13 with X99 Broadwell-E family and Haswell-E family


nmano
 Share

1,954 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I have the same Mainboard. You have modded bios ore unlock msr with KernelPatch? If You have modded bios can you share the file? 

I deleted the modded file but here there are guides how to patch bios with uefipatch...it's very simple. Here is the post:

http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/285444-uefipatch-uefi-patching-utility/page-96?hl=%2Buefipatch&do=findComment&comment=2277274

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fixed unsupported GPU Error After Effects with CUDA

1-Install Cuda

2-Edit  to raytracer_supported_cards.txt

Just add your device on top

GeForce GTX 970

GeForce GTX 285

GeForce GTX 675MX

GeForce GTX 680

GeForce GTX 680MX

GeForce GT 650M

Quadro CX

Quadro FX 4800

Quadro 4000

Quadro K5000

 

/Applications/Adobe After Effects CC 2015/Adobe After Effects CC 2015.app/Contents/Resources/raytracer_supported_cards.txt

 

 

Fast Draft: Available

 Texture Memory: 1638.00 MB

Ray-tracing: GPU

 

OpenGL

Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation

Device: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 OpenGL Engine

Version: 2.1 NVIDIA-10.13.65 367.15.10.05f01

Total Memory: 4.00 GB

Shader Model: -

CUDA

Driver Version: 8.0

Devices: 1 (GeForce GTX 970)

Current Usable Memory: 2.66 GB (at application launch)

Maximum Usable Memory: 4.00 GB

post-413859-0-91924000-1475327955_thumb.png

raytracer_supported_cards.txt

post-413859-0-15474000-1475328019_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fabiosun,

 

I won't have time to check FW 3402 for a month since I will be out for business trip.

Will check it out once I get back.

 

hi nmano

could you check this?

Could you help to create a valid DSDT for my system?

I would like to know if using a correct DSDT produces different results on my rig

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Fliagd.

 

I was wondering if you can take a look at mine too, for dual CPU?

 

I keep getting kernel panic with 121 CPUS but when i shut off hyper treading I got 120 and can pass on to installation screen. I've tried playing with the DSDT and found SCK0-04 and not sure if thats responsible for passing wrong information to the kernel.

 

Thanks a lot,

 

Here is the original ACPI dump from clover.

origin.zip 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gimme a few min I'll test it out
Same thing.

Panic with hyper on:
7e3b506290e550e8d4d061e5233ab213.jpg

And without:
46a5838a47682a1f5dcb6c5b19fbbd37.jpg


What really confuses me is that between those two the first one have the double amount of processor ids, but what's funny is that I think os thinks we are in 2040 with 120 core cpus.

Can this be the dsdt issue?

 

 

on the side note, after I've managed to install, i get this, Terminal failes to open and GeekBench doesn't know what architecture it is running on.

 

Oh and on this board I have to specify the amount of memory I've got in the SMBIOS section otherwise it only detects 32gb out of 128.

post-6786-0-95951600-1475366320_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when you boot without hyper threading

What is displayed in "About This Mac"?

 

 

It show 2x the cpu but unknown, I'm working on installing it again, will have the screen shot the moment I'm on the system, but the problem is even with the hyper threading off, the system is unworkable, can't access terminal, and gets some random kernel crashes time to time. I've tried tweaking DSDT with the X99 patches and removing extra CPU stuff from it, but no luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you put a Fake CPUID?

Yup: 0x040674

 

That's the only one that worked for me.

 

The weird thing is that fabiosun have the same CPU just a single one and different motherboard and it installs without a problem, I've even tried his config file just in case. Same results.

 

I guess there is something ether in dual cpus or in the motherboard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is due to the number of cores 44x2
88 cores must exceed OSX capacity management
The motherboard is not in question


osX management capacity would 2F (47) so 48 cores (CP2F)

This is probably why you can not activate the hyper thearding

post-1181448-0-57359200-1475368350.png

Edited by Fljagd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is due to the number of cores 44x2

88 cores must exceed OSX capacity management

The motherboard is not in question

 

osX management capacity would 2F (47) so 48 cores (CP2F)

This is probably why you can not activate the hyper thearding

 

Thanks man, to be quite honest I'm fully ok with hyper threading off, my issue is the system instability and terminal crashing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...