mitch_de Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Small 2D benchmark (of course OpenGL is used by QE / OS X) that measures creation time of 333 windows.Possible to select tested gpu/display for multi gpu systems (HD4000+discrete GPU).HD4000 performs very well compared to discrete gpus, because of fast cpu(cache)gpu bandwidth , no PCI-E overhead times/transferlimits and very low complex OpenGL commands / very less memeory transfer sizes compared to 3D benches.430 GT / OS X 10.9 / Quad 2.8 : around 24,1 sec (Oct 2013 Version!) EDIT: New Oct 2013 version: - max. window size = screen size doesnt matter anymore - added an second buffer flash = a bit more cpu>gpu transfer for each window Old values cant be compared to oct 2013 version! users with lower ( 2D_Benchmark_Oct2013.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p.H Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 my feedback. Machines specs are in signature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stefano.85 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Tested on the first hack in signature... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted December 4, 2012 Author Share Posted December 4, 2012 screen size does matter (takes a bit more time to render). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stefano.85 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 screen size does matter (takes a bit more time to render). yeah, i think that's a variable to take in consideration. I've installed the new gfx card just yesterday and i'm doing all possible tests to understand if it's all ok... cheers mitch and thx for all benchs software Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morfy Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 Result Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maximus Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Seems consistent with the rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maniac10 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 My system is on my signature, running at 1920x1080. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stefano.85 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 it seems that this benchmark is more cpu related than others... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 15, 2013 Author Share Posted January 15, 2013 Yep - CPU/ CPU Cache Speed and PCIe TransferSpeed does matter much. GPU Gaming speed doesnt matter. Ist not an classic OpenGL / GPU bench , more an 2D Bench - as it is named (even OpenGL and therefor the GPU is used by Apple). But anyway interesting - shows that gpus like Intel HD4000 work really good in ths case of 2D / Window tasks. Also, that 2D window bench would run extreme slow if the GPU isnt enabled as OpenGL accelerated Quartz device - in case of dsdt / chameleon injectin problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayang-NT Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 2500K @ 4.4GHz - AMD6870 1GB .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regi Yassin Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 specs in signature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkdwt Posted October 26, 2013 Share Posted October 26, 2013 Specs in signature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
npwski Posted October 26, 2013 Share Posted October 26, 2013 GTX Titan / OS X 10.9 / i7-2700K@4.75Ghz 1920x1080 : 22.4 sec 2560x1440 : 23.2 sec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted October 26, 2013 Share Posted October 26, 2013 Acer 8930G /core2duo T6500/NV 9600GSm MV 10.9 test 1080p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted October 26, 2013 Share Posted October 26, 2013 Opteron 3350 HE / HD 4670 / Lion 10.7.5 i386 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted October 28, 2013 Share Posted October 28, 2013 This is low end computer (#2 in sign). Not so bad, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacksheep Posted October 28, 2013 Share Posted October 28, 2013 How to compare results if there's so many variables: CPU, GPU, PCIE speed, screen size? Anyway nice bench mitch_de, as always Mac Pro 4,1/5,1 3.33 Hex HD5850 5.0 GT/s 10.8.5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
npwski Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 Geforce 8600 GTS 256Mb / OS X 10.9 / i7-2700K@4.75Ghz 1920x1080 = 22 sec 2560x1440 = 24 sec Old good Gf 8600 GTS is enough for 2D No problems with desktop animation in Mavericks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted November 1, 2013 Author Share Posted November 1, 2013 try to attach new oct version, upload (2.7MB) file fails - stuck at 1 MB. Will try later again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Geforce 8600 GTS 256Mb / OS X 10.9 / i7-2700K@4.75Ghz 1920x1080 = 22 sec Shot 2013-10-28 в 7.06.17.png 2560x1440 = 24 sec Shot 2013-10-28 в 7.04.38.png Old good Gf 8600 GTS is enough for 2D No problems with desktop animation in Mavericks. See, I have 27 seconds with IntelX3100. Is your Geforce only 20% faster? I think it is 5 times faster. It is not the test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
npwski Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Slice It's 2D-only test. In 2D my 8600-GTS shows same results as my GTX-Titan, and I think it's normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted November 3, 2013 Author Share Posted November 3, 2013 got uploaded now the new version (windows size limited , so screen size doesn't matter anymore). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacksheep Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 R9 280x, 3.33 Hex, 10.8.5 Disabling v-sync makes wonders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted November 10, 2013 Author Share Posted November 10, 2013 R9 280x, 3.33 Hex, 10.8.5 Disabling v-sync makes wonders. How did you switch vsync off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts