Jump to content
4261 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Thank you for the answers, then several possibiltés I compiled chameleon doing mods, it is possible that the segments are not aligned after compilation.

after defragmentation of the Windows partition and chkdsk reorganizations,
the message "Kernel -__ symtab" not a kext "disappeared .. The concern is not that it is important as a message, but it appears this message.
So actually the message disappeared but I have no rational explanation.
thank you again


Why config option documented in the chameleon user manual does not work ?

"Additional Useful command-line options:
config = <file> Use an alternate Boot.plist queue. "

I upload the revision 2710 of Enoch (My Branch of Chameleon)

--> http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/files/file/71-enoch/

 

It has a "support" for El Capitan

 

I say "support" (Double quote) because is untested.

 

If someone try it with "El Capitan" let me know

(I have not the time to try myself on 10.11 DP1) other things have hight priority.

 

NOTE: the disk icon still generic until the graphics stuff will be made... maybe Blackosx :whistle: :whistle: :whistle: :whistle:

 

ErmaC

  • Like 6

I upload the revision 2710 of Enoch (My Branch of Chameleon)

--> http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/files/file/71-enoch/

 

It has a "support" for El Capitan

 

I say "support" (Double quote) because is untested.

 

If someone try it with "El Capitan" let me know

(I have not the time to try myself on 10.11 DP1) other things have hight priority.

 

NOTE: the disk icon still generic until the graphics stuff will be made... maybe Blackosx :whistle: :whistle: :whistle: :whistle:

 

ErmaC

 

 

yeah! lets rock!

I upload the revision 2710 of Enoch (My Branch of Chameleon)

--> http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/files/file/71-enoch/

 

It has a "support" for El Capitan

 

I say "support" (Double quote) because is untested.

 

If someone try it with "El Capitan" let me know

(I have not the time to try myself on 10.11 DP1) other things have hight priority.

 

NOTE: the disk icon still generic until the graphics stuff will be made... maybe Blackosx :whistle: :whistle: :whistle: :whistle:

 

ErmaC

Guide ready for the forum "ita" and ready to test

 

Fabio

The same revision boot fine Yosemite?

 

put FakeSMC into /Extra/Extensions/

and try to boot with UseKernelCache = No

 

ErmaC

 

yes, fakesmc works great on yoses.

tried both. still nothing.

Both?

So not boot Yosemite?

 

ErmaC

 

no, i mean fakesmc boots fine yosemite but didnt seem to work in el capn. 

 

tried both about put fake in e/e and use the flag UseKernelCache=No

 

so far, no matter what i try, i get early reboot.

no, i mean fakesmc boots fine yosemite but didnt seem to work in el capn. 

 

tried both about put fake in e/e and use the flag UseKernelCache=No

 

so far, no matter what i try, i get early reboot.

 

 

Pls...

Enoch 2710 with Yosemite boot? or also reboot?

Enoch 2710 with El Capitan reboot

  • Like 1

Pls...

Enoch 2710 with Yosemite boot? or also reboot?

Enoch 2710 with El Capitan reboot

 

 

el captain reboot. didnt try yose.

 

hold the phone ill try it.

 

edit: yose boots just fine.

el captain reboot. didnt try yose.

 

hold the phone ill try it.

 

edit: yose boots just fine.

 

Ok now.

With yosemite where you have stored the FakeSMC kext? in S/L/E? have you any special flag in your org.chameleon.Boot.plist? (I ask about Yosemite)

 

Wold be useful to see if is able to boot one already configured El Capitan system.

Ok now.

With yosemite where you have stored the FakeSMC kext? in S/L/E? have you any special flag in your org.chameleon.Boot.plist? (I ask about Yosemite).

 

fakesmc in yose is in SLE. flags are -f kext-dev-mode=1 npci=0x2000 darkwake=0

fakesmc in yose is in SLE. flags are -f kext-dev-mode=1 npci=0x2000 darkwake=0

OK

 

About El Capitan:

You try to install it or you have already install it on the HD?

- In the case of installation (so you are on USB probably) how you create it?

- In the case is already installed on HD are you able to boot it with Clover?

OK

 

About El Capitan:

You try to install it or you have already install it on the HD?

- In the case of installation (so you are on USB probably) how you create it?

- In the case is already installed on HD are you able to boot it with Clover?

 

 

not installed. i tried with clover with createinstallmedia command. always stops on still wanting for root device. tried initiating with the app and booting with clover but cant get to the guii because my arrandale graph needs patch.

 

now im trying with the usb method. mount basesystem... restore... same as yoses. then installing chameleon and putting fakesmc and null in E/E. just by the book. flags and all.

 

get it?

  • Like 1

Yep!

 

I will w8 for some report to see if can boot a working installed system.

 

BTW: the changes I made.. I just extend the patch used to boot Yosemite.

 

ErmaC

 

cool! ill be around. thanks

I upload the revision 2710 of Enoch (My Branch of Chameleon)

--> http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/files/file/71-enoch/

 

It has a "support" for El Capitan

 

I say "support" (Double quote) because is untested.

 

If someone try it with "El Capitan" let me know

(I have not the time to try myself on 10.11 DP1) other things have hight priority.

 

NOTE: the disk icon still generic until the graphics stuff will be made... maybe Blackosx :whistle: :whistle: :whistle: :whistle:

 

ErmaC

 

Hi ErmaC,

 

I have 1095+10103+1011dp1 work fine with clover 3215, and 1095+10103 work fine with trunk 2705.

 

Test with Enoch 2710, still get reboot when starting kernel on dark screen, after gray screen reading kext things.

 

The following is the last line..................before reboot.

post-61100-0-47741300-1433938686_thumb.jpg

zone_init: kmem_suballoc failed\"@/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/xnu/xnu-3216.0.0.1.13/osfmk/kern/zalloc.c:2186"

Just the same error, reboot with trunk 2705.

 

crazybirdy

  • Like 1

What would be the difference to Clover if it was UEFI? Or rephrased, what would still be Chameleon?

95% of computers today UEFI and therefore I asked and suggested

 

EDIT: Sorry we are have a two UEFI bootloader. Why would not we had three...

95% of computers today UEFI and therefore I asked and suggested

 

I know and this was the reason Clover and Ozmosis have been developed. I just asked you what would actually be the difference to current solutions and how current techniques would apply if it was UEFI. UEFI would mean boot.efi would be launched and that would make most of the boot loader part in Chameleon obsolete which is the reason for many to still use it. Chameleon like it is now would not benefit from UEFI and a Chameleon adapted towards UEFI would almost be Clover. ;)

  • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...