Jump to content
14 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Wouah...

The new multitouch mouse i wonder if it's easy to use when you only used to know a PC mouse. Also aluminium remote seems very nice.

Core i7 to the mac and up to 16GB of Ram with option to 27 inch display my pc feel buggy.

IMO the price is now more justified and it's great to see that macbook price has been updated. I think Apple is doing a good move.

yeah I'm wondering the same thing as phoenixflame611... Snow Leopard STILL doesn't recognize my i7. It always lists it as an "Unknown" processor even after I installed the EFI v10.4 thing and a new smbios! Still not working... :)

Intel Core i7-860 Lynnfield 2.8GHz 8MB L3 Cache LGA 1156 dual channel

 

This is most likely what i7 they use

and it's not the infamous

 

Intel Core i7-9XX Bloomfield X.06GHz 4 x 256KB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache LGA 1366 triple channel

 

What might they be up to? Only the LGA 1366 will see the new Hexacore i9 extreme with the multiplier unlocked. Market date 1Q of 2010 (These currenly exist). Extremesystems web forum has already benched it and the results are more than enough not to choose LGA 1156 and then the reason for Triple channel memory emerges. There is also an Xeon EX coming down the pipe with 8 physical cores 16 logical cores but requires a new socket (Beckton)

. The Mac Pro is a socket LGA 1366 so expect an update past 2010 for dual socket Intel Xeon Gulftown (12 physical cores 24 logical total)

Apple dudes are smart at marketing!

 

My guess is they could not fit the thermal load of socket LGA 1366 (chip is physicaly much larger too). So, it makes sense they waited so long. Isn't this new iMac thinner? too!

What interests me most is the new 27inch display with 2560x1440 resolution, which is, as far as I know,

world's first 27 incher with that kind of high resolution. (correct me if I am wrong :unsure: )

I am guessing the panels are made by LGDisplay, exclusively for Apple and the display alone is worth

the money for any configuration

Agree, a great display. Most likely powered by a GPU that isn't better than what's currently availble on there Mac Pro, waste consedering what ATI eye (6 display port) infinity can do or a stock 5870 (DVI, display port, HDMI all running at once). Most iMacs use a mobile version GPU's with somewhat hadicapped GPU's to save on power and heat instead of running full tilt on dual slotted PCI-E with SLI or Crossfire. Just stating a point. I couldn't find out what GPU it uses? Let's hope that this baby gets some serious FPS for its resolution. Yes, it might matter to those that actually use real time rendering apps, but then again if one was serious about production work the obvious choice is a Mac Pro or Work Station PC based machine.

Agree, a great display. Most likely powered by a GPU that isn't better than what's currently availble on there Mac Pro, waste consedering what ATI eye (6 display port) infinity can do or a stock 5870 (DVI, display port, HDMI all running at once). Most iMacs use a mobile version GPU's with somewhat hadicapped GPU's to save on power and heat instead of running full tilt on dual slotted PCI-E with SLI or Crossfire. Just stating a point. I couldn't find out what GPU it uses? Let's hope that this baby gets some serious FPS for its resolution. Yes, it might matter to those that actually use real time rendering apps, but then again if one was serious about production work the obvious choice is a Mac Pro or Work Station PC based machine.

 

The quad-core 27in ones use the ATI Radeon HD 4850 graphics processor with 512MB of GDDR3 memory to quote the Apple site. The Pro has the option for the 4870. So eh.

;) update news on what the iMac 27" can do and yes it has a display port input so it act's only as a Monitor!

 

 

wired.com

 

Well if you can afford the latest and greatest in Tri SLI or Quad Crossfire for all PC gaming this as your monitor should be easy to afford. i9 cpu expected retail is $1500 or so. Thats pricey but what the hell. If your an enthusiast its worth it.

×
×
  • Create New...