Jump to content

EasyBCD 2.0 Beta: Automated PC_EFI, CHAIN0 Installation


Computer Guru
 Share

173 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Colaly: Manually keying in the drive number works?

Manualy keying?

EasyBCD use select drive 0-9,not work.

Manualy Menu.lst edit 80-89,not work.

 

sorry,my english very poor.

 

Grub-dfe.iso using,darwinbootloader Type 2digits.

type 80 show FirstHDD Vista partition appear,select boot OK

type 81 show SecondHDD Leopard Partition appear,select boot OK

 

New select drive feature work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So.. i installed beta52. I tried to select, as i could understand, various disk numbers but without success...

 

post-81354-1234790212_thumb.jpg

 

This is my system... is it right to give drive number 3 in this situation?

 

And in global settings on mac entry drive must to be C and neogrub must to be mbr even if disk is guid?

 

post-81354-1234790331_thumb.jpg

 

Thanks computer guru for your work and attention...

 

Edit:

It worked for me if i select as disk number on boot instead of 80 or 81 number 82... then system start and boot from osx bootloader.

Is it possible to force this entry (82) directly from easybcd gui and select only osx entry from bootloader on restart?

post-81354-1234790444_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lateralusman, please try the latest build of EasyBCD and manually specify a drive number when adding an EFI entry.

 

WyseOne, Colaly: Are you saying the "force a drive" feature in EasyBCD isn't working in the latest build?

 

 

Genius! I'm writing this from my sata mac thanks for the help Computer Guru!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK guys - the select a drive feature isn't wholly broken seeing as it works for some people but not others... looks like a bug in the Chameleon/PC_EFI v9 bootloader.

 

No worries, I have a couple more tricks to try - I'll have a new build up soon.

 

 

idividebyzero: Currently, no. But it's planned for an upcoming build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still not working, I am getting the same thing.

 

Vista on Drive 1 which is 1 NTFS partition

 

OSX on drive 2 which is 1 GUI HFS+ partition

 

When I select the OSX drive in Vista's boot manager this is what happens.

 

For a split second after selecting the OSX drive it switches to a black screen and there is a reference to (0,0) NTFS which I can't see exactly what it says but there appears to be one word in front of (0,0) NTFS, directly after this it goes to NeoGrub screen where I have to select nst_mac.efi when I select nst_mac.efi I get the 2 second countdown, I hit any key and manually punch in 81 to get it to boot from the 2nd drive.

 

my menu.lst:

 

swap (hd0)(hd1)

swap (hd1)(hd0)

 

title nst_mac.efi

find --set-root --ignore-floppies /NST/nst_mac.efi

kernel /NST/nst_mac.efi

boot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well i am not getting the Neogrub screen now so there is progress however I get an error about not finding com.apple.Boot.plist.

 

Does it make a difference if I used the the guide that boots from the EFI partition instead of the OS X partition? could that be why this is not working properly? and if so is there any way to dual boot by using this method of install.

 

Could I just swap drives and make the OS X the primary drive and Vista the secondary drive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today,I tested Build54&55.

Select drive new swap method not work same error.

Booting EFI Mode Giveup.

 

Old Manualy chain0 mode change.

First test

/dev/disk0

#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER

0: FDisk_partition_scheme *298.1 Gi disk0

1: Windows_NTFS 40.0 Gi disk0s1

2: Windows_NTFS 200.0 Gi disk0s2

/dev/disk1

#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER

0: GUID_partition_scheme *298.1 Gi disk1

1: EFI 200.0 Mi disk1s1

2: Apple_HFS Leopard 149.0 Gi disk1s2

3: Apple_HFS Work 148.6 Gi disk1s3

Copy chain0 From Leopard to /NST/,and rename.

After,chain0 error.

umm

 

Second test

Split disk1s3,2partition(Add FAT32 MSDOS Partition)

Disk1 Hybrid GPT/MBR change.

After list

/dev/disk0

#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER

0: FDisk_partition_scheme *298.1 Gi disk0

1: Windows_NTFS 40.0 Gi disk0s1

2: Windows_NTFS 200.0 Gi disk0s2

/dev/disk1

#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER

0: GUID_partition_scheme *298.1 Gi disk1

1: EFI 200.0 Mi disk1s1

2: Apple_HFS Leopard 149.0 Gi disk1s2

3: Apple_HFS Work 116.5 Gi disk1s3

4: Microsoft Basic Data SHARE 32.0 Gi disk1s4

Copy chain0 From Leopard to /NST/,and rename.

Chain0 good work.

 

Once EFI Mode challenge!

……not work.....

I use manualy chain0 method,back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Computer Guru:

 

If at this point

 

post-81354-1234976158_thumb.jpg

 

i put 82 instead than 80 or 81 boot goes on and my osx start perfectly... how to add this in easybcd gui?

 

No chance for me to use chain0 method... only bios bootloader works.

 

post-81354-1234976303_thumb.jpg

 

Thanks for your great work...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay so I just downloaded build 55 from here.

When adding a Mac entry I leave it in EFI mode and tick Use custom drive number and change it to 83. The number I found to be my sata mac install. When I click Add Entry I noticed the custom drive number changes to 9.

 

So when I reboot to shows the Boot device as 0x80.

After the two seconds are up to goes to Calling chainbooter BOOTMGR is missing.

But if I press a key before the two seconds and press 83 it boots fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will check back often to see if there is a new build to test however swapping drives in my HP Pavilion that does not have BIOS support for manually selecting it's internal second drive as the boot drive (don't ask me why) is working fine. For now I have to boot the OSX drive and use GRUB to select the Windows drive to boot. I would rather use the Windows boot manager since it is a simpler approach that requires less steps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets give Computer Guro all the time he needs to fix this issue. he don't own every computer/configuration in this world. And he has also other work/job to do.

 

I will be with you in Beta thru Final Release. :P

 

No rush :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...