#1
Posted 15 August 2008 - 01:18 AM
#2
Posted 15 August 2008 - 03:07 AM
#3
Posted 15 August 2008 - 03:44 AM
#4
Posted 15 August 2008 - 04:07 AM
btw will this be charged to text msg'ing or no?
#5
Posted 15 August 2008 - 04:15 AM
Thanks for the heads up, that application works amazingly well.Palringo works great for me, it's free from the App Store.
#6
Posted 15 August 2008 - 07:37 PM
Get the best ever multi-protocol chat: MobileChat! It's in the app store for only $3!!! It even includes a sort of push notification system.
#7
Posted 15 August 2008 - 08:45 PM
MobileChat3 = not free + Servers getting asshumped.
I pick Palringo.
#8
Posted 16 August 2008 - 04:52 AM
Palringo = Free, smooth running
MobileChat3 = not free + Servers getting asshumped.
I pick Palringo.
Servers are not getting asshumped, they've fixed all the problems. Palrgino has no keep-alive connection ability and no push notification system.
I pick MobileChat.
#9
Posted 16 August 2008 - 10:20 PM
#10
Posted 16 August 2008 - 11:33 PM
The push notification system has not been enabled by apple yet (2.1 firmware), so mobilechat doesn't actually have push notification yet either. They just have it all ready to go when apple finally does turn on "the switch".Servers are not getting asshumped, they've fixed all the problems. Palrgino has no keep-alive connection ability and no push notification system.
I pick MobileChat.
Nope, actually I believe you can use mobilechat to txt message using your data connection (you can txt without it counting as txting from your carrier).if i used mobile chat would it go against my txt messanging?
#11
Posted 17 August 2008 - 01:13 AM
So i don't think it uses ones data/internet plan
#12
Posted 17 August 2008 - 01:41 AM
#13
Posted 17 August 2008 - 01:45 AM
Palringo = Free, smooth running
MobileChat3 = not free + Servers getting asshumped.
I pick Palringo.
"How Does Palringo Connect? Palringo connects over the internet and will not work through a proxy. If you are using Palringo on a mobile phone then it will only use the phones data connection, whether that be WiFi, GPRS or 3G (not WAP) for example, and does not send/receive any SMS messages."
I pick Palringo
Now if only they'd let it running in the background while you were maybe doing something else it would be the best app
#14
Posted 17 August 2008 - 02:01 AM
#15
Posted 17 August 2008 - 03:32 AM
Palringo
#16
Posted 19 August 2008 - 09:34 PM
The push notification system has not been enabled by apple yet (2.1 firmware), so mobilechat doesn't actually have push notification yet either. They just have it all ready to go when apple finally does turn on "the switch".
Nope, actually I believe you can use mobilechat to txt message using your data connection (you can txt without it counting as txting from your carrier).
Sorry, try again. MobileChat uses a user-developed push notification system. It doesn't go through the phone, it can either send you a push through text message or email, whichever you use.
And guys, it works fine..jeez..
#17
Posted 19 August 2008 - 09:42 PM
Oh, nifty! I just read the section under being push compatible, didn't see the "fake push" method. I've just been using the AIM client, but I might try this instead. Thanks for the explanation berzerker!Sorry, try again. MobileChat uses a user-developed push notification system. It doesn't go through the phone, it can either send you a push through text message or email, whichever you use.
And guys, it works fine..jeez..
#18
Posted 09 September 2008 - 02:52 PM
#19
Posted 10 September 2008 - 02:16 AM
MobileChat really isn't so bad, not anymore.
I hope that by "not bad" you are referring to AIM/.Mac/ICQ and Google Talk support only...
And for the unenlightened, AIM/.Mac/ICQ are all the very same service with separate usernames.
It is lacking *MAJOR* functionality that is prominently advertised about the application.
Sure, their marketed feature list is "on the way", however it is not yet here meaning that all you get right now is offered freely through the official AIM client.
Add to that, an update has been "submitted, awaiting approval" for the past month now, and the "change list" the developers have been providing for that single submitted build that went to Apple keep changing on a regular basis, implying that no updated build has been submitted. When someone brings up these kinds of observations on their blog postings, they are promptly deleted as "confrontational".
Palringo at least supports all of their marketed features, which in my world accounts for a lot.
Personally, I am hoping that Beejive releases their client soon as it is shaping up to gain a commanding position in the marketplace. As well, they have a very good proven reputation in designing well-supported, reliable instant messaging clients as they have already designed several for various mobile platforms.
~Adrian
#20
Posted 10 September 2008 - 03:14 PM
an update has been "submitted, awaiting approval" for the past month now
Not their fault. Apple's app store is really that retarded. It's been awaiting approval for the past month and they've submitted 2 more updates but those updates can't be considered until Apple approves the current update.
implying that no updated build has been submitted
3 updated builds, majorly updated, stable and well-featured builds have been sent to Apple. This is how retarded the App store is. As I said, none of these builds can even be considered until Apple accepts the first update which was sent almost 2 months ago.
If you don't like it, email apple and {censored} to them, don't {censored} to the developers, because we're working our ass off on it, it's totally Apple's fault for being complete idiots with the App Store.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Sign In
Create Account







