insanely2010 Posted May 30, 2011 Share Posted May 30, 2011 I wrote a small Benchmark called "CoreBench" my goal is to finally demonstrate real speed of real-applications (worehouses/shops management) on MacOS and on Windows For now i've collected a small amount of results from some friends... Now what i'm asking is to write on this topic, the final score of Corebench with some system infos like: 4150 Intel I7 2.6Ghz MacOS 10.6.7 or (better) to link the app-screenshot maded by CoreBench... the download link for latest Corebench is: http://www.wcn.it/CoreBench.html (P.S. i dont' need result from MultiCore app... just CoreBench) I'm very interested on scores from 10.6.2 (I think the MacOS speed 'is diminished after this release) a comparative test on the same machine (10.6.2 and 10.6>2) would be great Thanks in advance for any help/test Updated build is 0.60-0.62 http://www.wcn.it/CoreBench.ReactOS.faster.than.Windows.Benchmark.jpg Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
stefano.85 Posted May 30, 2011 Share Posted May 30, 2011 Thanks in advance for any help/test Hi.... these are my benchs results from both lion 11459e & win7 64bit sp1), my system info is in rig. Cheers UPDATE: oh i've lost to say that my q9300 intel quad processor is overclocked @3.446 mhz instead of standard 2.500mhz with 4 gb of ddr2 ram@919mhz... byeeeee Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690573 Share on other sites More sharing options...
insanely2010 Posted May 30, 2011 Author Share Posted May 30, 2011 Hi.... these are my benchs results from both lion 11459e & win7 64bit sp1), my system info is in rig. Cheers Thanks very much! i will add your scores to "comparison screen" this evening. P.S. OMG time to add "Lion" to corebench :mellow: Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690583 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayang-NT Posted May 30, 2011 Share Posted May 30, 2011 here's mine .... Windows 7 Lion build 11A459e Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690592 Share on other sites More sharing options...
flip360 Posted May 30, 2011 Share Posted May 30, 2011 Heres mine from my notebook will post the results of my desktop later @ home EDIT: The first two pictures are from the Notebook the later are from the Desktop where Lion vs Win7 is far lower score :\ Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690599 Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppleIIGuy Posted May 30, 2011 Share Posted May 30, 2011 Core i7 920 8 GB ram Imac11,1 Core i5 12 Gb Ram Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690603 Share on other sites More sharing options...
HFW Posted May 30, 2011 Share Posted May 30, 2011 Mine... Lion: Win 7 SP1: Specs in signature. ;P Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690609 Share on other sites More sharing options...
insanely2010 Posted May 30, 2011 Author Share Posted May 30, 2011 very powerfull PCs/MACs Thanks very much to all! now i can do a Mac/Win preliminary comparison Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690619 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mm67 Posted May 30, 2011 Share Posted May 30, 2011 Sabertooth X58 from sig: Snow Leopard 10.6.7 Win 7 64-bit SP1 Q9550 from sig: Snow Leopard 10.6.7 Win 7 64-bit SP1 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690641 Share on other sites More sharing options...
insanely2010 Posted May 30, 2011 Author Share Posted May 30, 2011 UPDATE: oh i've lost to say that my q9300 intel quad processor is overclocked @3.446 mhz instead of standard 2.500mhz with 4 gb of ddr2 ram@919mhz... byeeeee ok, thx for this info Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690666 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted May 30, 2011 Share Posted May 30, 2011 "I'm very interested on scores from 10.6.2 (I think the MacOS speed 'is diminished after this release) a comparative test on the same machine (10.6.2 and 10.6>2) would be great" Hhmm, do you really think that? Even OS X vs Win 7 , same CPU shows near same results, so the bench may be very hardwareclose and not uses much OS X speed diffs . What kind of CPU code is gettings computed ? I ask because my 10.6.8, C2D 2.8 GHz / 3 MB Cache ( low end CPU today) runs not much (4159 points) slower than faster clocked CPUs?! Or misunderstood reailpoints as benchmark indicator (higher=faster) ? THANKS Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690694 Share on other sites More sharing options...
insanely2010 Posted May 30, 2011 Author Share Posted May 30, 2011 Hhmm, do you really think that? Even OS X vs Win 7 , same CPU shows near same results, so the bench may be very hardwareclose and not uses much OS X speed diffs . You're right, seems that a very small GCC app can do the same things on Windows or MacOS on the same time. This morning I did not have enough data yet to confirm it. now... i think that a small app (compiled using GCC/MINGW) that just do a Arrays swaps.. string search, simple floating point operations (like a small shop management app) run on Win or MacOS on the same way... (i think also that a Microsoft Visual C app or a native Objective C app runs much faster on her native platform).. but this is not the scope of this small Benchmark. an updated screenshot of today results... Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690766 Share on other sites More sharing options...
singh99 Posted May 30, 2011 Share Posted May 30, 2011 P8P67 LE i5 2500k 1 OS x 10.6.7 64 bit stock speed. 2. Win 7 64 bit stock speed. 3. Mac OS x 10.6.7 turbo x42 4 Win 7 turbo x42 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690787 Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackosx Posted May 30, 2011 Share Posted May 30, 2011 Core2Duo E7300@2.66Ghz OS X 10.6.7 (kernel in 64-bit mode) OS X 10.6.7 (kernel in 32-bit mode) OS X 10.7.0 (kernel in 64-bit mode) OS X 10.7.0 (kernel in 32-bit mode) Win 7 64-bit Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690791 Share on other sites More sharing options...
insanely2010 Posted May 30, 2011 Author Share Posted May 30, 2011 3. Mac OS x 10.6.7 turbo x424 Win 7 turbo x42 really impressive seems that the turbo mode can really speed-up (small i think) apps! anyone else have this "options" on his MB? ( a lot of results... now i must add a scroll function on comparison window for the 0.49 build ) Core2Duo E7300@2.66GhzOS X 10.6.7 (kernel in 64-bit mode) umh... CoreBench is a 32Bit app... i don't know if a 32app run a bit slowly on 64bit mode... can you launch MacOS on i386 mode for a MacOS64 vs MacOS32 for 32Bit Apps? thx! Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690799 Share on other sites More sharing options...
startas Posted May 30, 2011 Share Posted May 30, 2011 I think that this bench is not very good to test something, because there is almost no diference between my old pentium t3200 @ 2 GHZ and i5 or i7 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690818 Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackosx Posted May 30, 2011 Share Posted May 30, 2011 umh... CoreBench is a 32Bit app... i don't know if a 32app run a bit slowly on 64bit mode... can you launch MacOS on i386 mode for a MacOS64 vs MacOS32 for 32Bit Apps? thx! I've updated my first post with the scores from OS X with the kernel in 32-bit mode. There's no real difference in the scores. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690822 Share on other sites More sharing options...
insanely2010 Posted May 30, 2011 Author Share Posted May 30, 2011 because there is almost no diference between my old pentium t3200 @ 2 GHZ and i5 or i7 you are right, and i think your P4 3.2 works very fast compared to a brand new 2011-AtomDualcore the point is that this a comparison benchmark "MacOS vs Windows" .. that simulate a software for Wharehouse/shop management ... i don't ask the benchmark to do a massive multicore zip compression (using 4/8 4.2Ghz cores? for compressing what?) or a massive fibonacci sequence analisys (for what again?) but... just to execute a REAL app, for a small SHOP... that has a BEGIN .. and and END... not something like: How many items my x4 4.2Ghz can rename on 5 seconds ( 2 Millions? maybe 4?... for what? no one need to rename 1 millions of items on a warehouse in a couple of seconds.) a way to retrieve a speed measurement like other benchmarks is to apply the CoreBench result to an "hyperbole" where 5000 points corresponds to +infinite well... using this approach ... the i7 930 scores probably change to an p4 3.2 * 10 score ( i try to guess) But on real (work) world.. when the i7 is to give the his maximum power (using caching... multithreading.... and any sort of magical thing...) ... the app... just END... ( job is done ) Well .. this is what i think about my benchmark.. Startas, thanks for giving me the opportunity to express my "logic" and i promise you that for tomorrow the "Heavy Apps" vs "Small Apps" scores will be added to CoreBench. P.S. an I7 is x4 with HT ( something like ... 4+4 cores ) .. and athe P4 3.2 is an X1 with HT ( something like 1+1 cores ) CoreBench do just a "single thread test"... 1/8 of the maximum i7 power ... and 50% of the P4 maximum power ( rough estimate ). I've updated my first post with the scores from OS X with the kernel in 32-bit mode. There's no real difference in the scores. We have finally established that a "small GCC 32-app" accomplish his work on the same time using a 64bit Kernel or a 32bit Kernel Thank you blackosx! Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690846 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashe Posted May 31, 2011 Share Posted May 31, 2011 Hi, Snow 10.6.6 (kernel in 64-bit mode) Same résultat that blackosx we have nearly the same config system. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690947 Share on other sites More sharing options...
insanely2010 Posted May 31, 2011 Author Share Posted May 31, 2011 Same résultat that blackosx we have nearly the same config system. Can you retest using only "CoreBench" ? Thx in advance. updated: Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1690997 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashe Posted May 31, 2011 Share Posted May 31, 2011 Yes insanely2010, There is no problem, there is a difference. 4201 old résultat,new 12970. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1691001 Share on other sites More sharing options...
insanely2010 Posted June 1, 2011 Author Share Posted June 1, 2011 it's just another visualization style (heavy applications) clicking mouse the "old" Small-apps scores are displayed Thank you! Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1691350 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin17 Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1691592 Share on other sites More sharing options...
insanely2010 Posted June 1, 2011 Author Share Posted June 1, 2011 i5 2500k this is without "turbo modes/overclock" i suppose Thank you for posting (added your score to CB 0.58) Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1691600 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin17 Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 Yep. Soon I'll post the score that I get with Turbo Mode enabled in OC Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/258124-macos-vs-windows-a-custom-benchmark-for-productivity-apps/#findComment-1691826 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts