Jump to content

Stability of Leopard Preview


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1
munky

munky

    Agent of Evolution

  • Retired
  • 2,900 posts
  • Location:The Land of Hairy-Arsed Highlanders
Hi,

I just placed the order today for my new MacBook, and am already downloading the Leopard preview. How stable does it seem at this point? Should I consider using it as my main OS instead of Tiger?

Opinions please!

#2
Seals

Seals

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Just Joined
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
It's a very early build so I wouldn't have it as my main OS, keep using Tiger when the Macbook comes in the mail and enjoy it.


Seals~

#3
INFNITE

INFNITE

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 526 posts
just watch the WWDC keynote at around the 00:40:20 mark and you'll get a sense of how stable Leopard is at this point.

#4
Adrian Fogge

Adrian Fogge

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Donators
  • 794 posts
While it does "work", it does so in a quirky kind of way.

For example, try installing something on a PPC system and you will see Installer pulling all avaliable CPU for the next couple hours to complete the install in the case of something like iWork.

Intel systems do not appear to have this issue.

#5
mark.

mark.

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 21 posts
It's just a preview beta though, not even a beta, right?
I would definately not use this as the main OS, just something to mess around with.

#6
Adrian Fogge

Adrian Fogge

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Donators
  • 794 posts
The difference between Alpha and Beta are mostly semantic.
In this case, it would appear to be a beta as it contains portions that are feature-complete and other portions that are functional.

Alpha is generally reserved for Proof-of-Concept rather than an actual functioning implementation.

Of course, it all depends on what Apple as a whole calls it.

Something could be publically released and classified as stable but still be a beta as it is not feature-complete due to the developer's own specifications and ideas of what it should be and do.

#7
firefighter3a14

firefighter3a14

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 49 posts
I'm running it as my main OS on my G4 mac mini and having no problems so far. Im keeping tiger on my ibook for now, but if i experience no problems on my mini i will be installing it on my iBook. So far it seems like tiger with some enhancements to me. :gun:

#8
Kazuran

Kazuran

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 35 posts
Not only a bit slow, but also a bit buggy, and simply incomplete. Even Spaces acts quirky when compared to Virtuedesktops.

#9
Adrian Fogge

Adrian Fogge

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Donators
  • 794 posts
Yea, spaces is very quirky.
For example, if one is running an application solely on one desktop and it were to open a new window, and you were to switch to another desktop, it would appear on the most recent switch as it is still "active".

Additionally, try dragging a window most of the way off to one of the sides with a virtual desktop and change over to it...

#10
ytjameslee

ytjameslee

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Just Joined
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
  • Location:Marina del Rey, CA, USA
I'm not really noticing it being slow, but I have been using it a couple of hours and have already found the following "features" =)

1) Spaces: Apple+Tab betweem apps will take you to the right desktop but does not activate the selected app. (apparently I'm not the only one here...)

2) Applications that do not currently have a Help Menu uses the last menu name twice, the second one being what "Help" should have been.

3) Stuffit Expander has problems (or is this just me)

4) My Canon LiDE30 scanner driver no longer works.... =(

Other people have complained about https not working in safari and no audio, though I haven't had any problems with this. I have installed it on a powerbook g4 and am thinking about installing it on a g5 to see if there is a noticeable performance difference with the 64bit stuff. Anyone here installed on a g5 powermac?

#11
munky

munky

    Agent of Evolution

  • Retired
  • 2,900 posts
  • Location:The Land of Hairy-Arsed Highlanders
think i'll stick to tiger then :sorcerer: thanks for all the input.

#12
Masna

Masna

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 59 posts
It's never a bad idea to add a second partition, and preview Leopard on it (non pun intended).

One thing I don't understand, though, is, how could Apple have handed out this preview, if after a few days, users are noticing quirks, and bugs? This isn't like Apple...

#13
Mackie

Mackie

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 24 posts
It's meant for developers only obviously...

#14
Ouch

Ouch

    Weee, what a predicament!

  • Retired
  • 1,190 posts
  • Location:Edinburgh, Scotland
Developers are more interested in the new API's to get a head start in developing their apps - their not so bothered if OS application features don't work as intended.

#15
Masna

Masna

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 59 posts

Developers are more interested in the new API's to get a head start in developing their apps - their not so bothered if OS application features don't work as intended.


Good point.

#16
duransnipes

duransnipes

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 35 posts
It crases Alot of apps like Dreamweaver and Cyberduck will not work for me.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

© 2014 InsanelyMac  |   News  |   Forum  |   Downloads  |   OSx86 Wiki  |   Mac Netbook  |   PHP hosting by CatN  |   Designed by Ed Gain  |   Logo by irfan  |   Privacy Policy