Andy Vandijck Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 I recently rebuilt HandBrake with all code and GUI stuff fixed. It now supports 3 architectures... - 64-bit x86_64 - 32-bit i386 - 32-bit PPC The tests we have done this far suggest it now transcodes files very fast... You can get it from: http://rapidshare.com/files/213100261/AnV_...3_32_64-Bit.pkg Enjoy everybody... Update: Some more files that need to be put under /Applications/VLC.app/Contents/MacOS/lib They are needed for 64-bit encrypted DVD (CSS) decryption... VLC_Extra.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Konami® Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 Thanks a lot for another Andy's releases! I love this app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted March 24, 2009 Author Share Posted March 24, 2009 Thanks a lot for another of your great releases! No problem... this was made to satisfy a friend who transcodes tons of stuff... He transcoded more than 300 DVD's to H.264 and wanted a faster way... I gave him that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miliuco Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 Thank you, Andy, I love your SMBIOS and now this app. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danaurel Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 Thank You very much!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sama7896 Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 Hell yeah !!! I don't think i ever saw my quad core used up at 390%. I always wondered why hard-code apps only use a fraction of the cpu firepower... Seems u fixed that THANKS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted March 24, 2009 Author Share Posted March 24, 2009 I recently rebuilt HandBrake with all code and GUI stuff fixed.It now supports 3 architectures... - 64-bit x86_64 - 32-bit i386 - 32-bit PPC The tests we have done this far suggest it now transcodes files very fast... You can get it from: http://rapidshare.com/files/213100261/AnV_...3_32_64-Bit.pkg Enjoy everybody... Update: Some more files that need to be put under /Applications/VLC.app/Contents/MacOS/lib They are needed for 64-bit encrypted DVD (CSS) decryption... I added vlc_libdvbpsi.dylib and vlc_libdvdcss.dylib for decryption in 64-bit of encrypted DVD's... See first post for installing... They are universal binaries with 4 architectures: - i386 - x86_64 - ppc - ppc64 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted March 24, 2009 Author Share Posted March 24, 2009 I recently rebuilt HandBrake with all code and GUI stuff fixed.It now supports 3 architectures... - 64-bit x86_64 - 32-bit i386 - 32-bit PPC The tests we have done this far suggest it now transcodes files very fast... You can get it from: http://rapidshare.com/files/213100261/AnV_...3_32_64-Bit.pkg Enjoy everybody... Update: Some more files that need to be put under /Applications/VLC.app/Contents/MacOS/lib They are needed for 64-bit encrypted DVD (CSS) decryption... I added vlc_libdvbpsi.dylib and vlc_libdvdcss.dylib for decryption in 64-bit of encrypted DVD's... See first post for installing... They are universal binaries with 4 architectures: - i386 - x86_64 - ppc - ppc64 I also submitted the patches (diffs) to the HandBrake team... Lets see if they are going to merge it in the main tree... (it was approved so...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimmer Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 AnV, I just tried your App, I like that is is Universal, but it is not faster than the original one on my MacBook Pro. A 2hr movie takes 35 min (iPhone h.264 encode) on the original, yours 2hr 15min. I checked Activity monitor, yours loads as 64-Bit and takes 35GB of virtual memory, original loads as 32-Bit and only takes 1GB of virtual memory. Will test on a PowerMac to see the difference there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted March 24, 2009 Author Share Posted March 24, 2009 AnV, I just tried your App, I like that is is Universal, but it is not faster than the original one on my MacBook Pro. A 2hr movie takes 35 min (iPhone h.264 encode) on the original, yours 2hr 15min. I checked Activity monitor, yours loads as 64-Bit and takes 35GB of virtual memory, original loads as 32-Bit and only takes 1GB of virtual memory. Will test on a PowerMac to see the difference there. Could you test that with various other movies? I find it hard to believe that the 64-bit version wouldn't be faster... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimmer Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 Could you test that with various other movies?I find it hard to believe that the 64-bit version wouldn't be faster... AnV, I found it hard to believe too, I will test some other movies and report back tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted March 25, 2009 Author Share Posted March 25, 2009 AnV, I found it hard to believe too, I will test some other movies and report back tonight. OK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmdshft Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 Does this speed up the ripping process? I've seen Handbrake say it was going to take over 9 hours to rip an hour and a half DVD... Unacceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted March 25, 2009 Author Share Posted March 25, 2009 Does this speed up the ripping process? I've seen Handbrake say it was going to take over 9 hours to rip an hour and a half DVD... Unacceptable. Normally it should... if you have got a 64-bit capable PC that is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimmer Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 OK AnV, Ok, I tested 2 different movies, I waited until it completed the first 10% and recorded the avg FPS, here are the results: Handbrake Movie 1 62FPS Movie 2 83 FPS Handbrake AnV Movie 1 16 FPS Movie 2 21 FPS Your version does run in 64-Bit mode, but does not speed up the process. I am not trying to put your work down, i love your work, but this is unfortunately the exception. I hope that you can find out what went wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmdshft Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 Normally it should... if you have got a 64-bit capable PC that is... Only 32-bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted March 25, 2009 Author Share Posted March 25, 2009 Only 32-bit. It may work faster then again it may not... I built a full release no debug version so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodoodm Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 For me it slow down to when convertin from DIVX to iPhone : ( Befor update: After update: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted March 25, 2009 Author Share Posted March 25, 2009 AnV, Ok, I tested 2 different movies, I waited until it completed the first 10% and recorded the avg FPS, here are the results: Handbrake Movie 1 62FPS Movie 2 83 FPS Handbrake AnV Movie 1 16 FPS Movie 2 21 FPS Your version does run in 64-Bit mode, but does not speed up the process. I am not trying to put your work down, i love your work, but this is unfortunately the exception. I hope that you can find out what went wrong. hmm... shame... I thought 64-bit version would greatly improve everything... guess I was wrong in most cases... It's probably the libraries as most of them don't tend to have 64-bit assembly for them but 32-bit assembly most of them do... I built everything separate though... as optimized as they could get... Too bad thus... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arial Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 mine slowdown too.. Source: DVD5 on HDD (01:31:15) Encoding Preset: High Profile (Film - default) HandBrake v0.9.3 Encoding Time : 3 hours 4 minutes Encoding Speed: 15 fps HandBrake v0.9.3 AnV Encoding Time : cancelled at 29% (pas 2 of 2) @ 3 hours 48 minutes Encoding Speed: 4 fps Bug: no encoding progress bar some issue: HandBrake v0.9.3 Log http://paste2.org/p/171414 Line #91: x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 Cache64 HandBrake v0.9.3 AnV Log http://paste2.org/p/171417 Line #107: x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: none! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted March 25, 2009 Author Share Posted March 25, 2009 mine slowdown too.. Source: DVD5 on HDD (01:31:15) Encoding Preset: High Profile (Film - default) HandBrake v0.9.3 Encoding Time : 3 hours 4 minutes Encoding Speed: 15 fps HandBrake v0.9.3 AnV Encoding Time : cancelled at 29% (pas 2 of 2) @ 3 hours 48 minutes Encoding Speed: 4 fps Bug: no encoding progress bar some issue: HandBrake v0.9.3 Log http://paste2.org/p/171414 Line #91: x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 Cache64 HandBrake v0.9.3 AnV Log http://paste2.org/p/171417 Line #107: x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: none! I see so just like I thought... the libraries and features... 64-bit version doesn't support intrinsics... That is a real bummer... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimmer Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 I see so just like I thought... the libraries and features...64-bit version doesn't support intrinsics... That is a real bummer... Now that you know what went wrong, do you think you can fix it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted March 26, 2009 Author Share Posted March 26, 2009 Now that you know what went wrong, do you think you can fix it? Not sure... would require asm rewrites... Will take tons of time... I'll look into it though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bs0d Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 Not sure... would require asm rewrites...Will take tons of time... I'll look into it though so what kind of testing was done since in post #1 you said "The tests we have done this far suggest it now transcodes files very fast..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted March 27, 2009 Author Share Posted March 27, 2009 so what kind of testing was done since in post #1 you said "The tests we have done this far suggest it now transcodes files very fast..." Sent it to someone with a quad core Intel first... he suggested it worked fine and was a lot faster... I published going further on his opinion.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts