Jump to content

First batch of Leopard rumors


Swad

Last year's WWDC changed the world. Well, ok, maybe just the computing world. It certainly led to the creation of this site, faster Macs, universal apps, and bright future for Macs (not to mention almost full Windows compatibility).

 

While this year's WWDC is not likely to be as exciting, it still promises a lot of fun. Mac OS Rumors has what I believe are some of the first real “insider info” rumor reports... that is if you can find it among the sea of advertisements (Thank you, Adblock Filterset.G).

 

The highlights:

 

Faster is better. Leopard is reported to fly on Intel processors due to heavy improvements in compiling for Intel. This was something most of us were expecting, but it’ll be a welcome improvement.

 

Better widgets. The article wasn’t terribly clear on this point, and while it doesn’t sound that exciting, apparently widgets will find better integration with the system.

 

Unified theme. We knew this was coming – Mail.app look throughout.

 

Re-introduction of Quartz 2D Extreme. Oh! I had been looking for that... ???

Did we mention teh snappy? “We're talking about 100%+ performance boosts in many benchmarks that are dependent on compiler optimization, GPU acceleration, efficient use of multiple CPUs and high-bandwidth motherboards, etc.....and 40, 50, 70, 80% boosts in many others.”

 

Should be interesting to see how these pan out.


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



... my bet would be that Apple will use one Woodcrest (witch is double core also but is for servers) or two Woodcrests (4 cores)

 

As far as Woodcrest goes, the top of the line certainly will be a dual Woodcrest box. While Apple very well may maintain a single chip "pro" machine with the Mac Pros, it seems kind of stupid in the face of Woodcrest economics. Unlike the G5, Woodcrests get radically cheaper with decreasing clockspeed, this means to me that the entry Mac Pro should still be a dual Woodcrest machine, not a single.

 

This assertation plus the facts that Woodcrests chipsets are much more expensive and require FB-DIMMs, plus a variety of other factors, indicate to me that Apple needs to move the Mac Pro line upscale and introduce a new Conroe based mid-tower for consumers (who really have no need for quad-core machines).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two things, I wonder if we will be able to run Lepord as well, this should translate to better hardware support once the towers come out.

 

If OSX can get the .exe to work (can't recall the link but there is progress), Windoze is in trouble. This program that I speak of runs .exe native, no virtual, re-booting, emulation or anything, it just runs.

 

Since Apple depreciated support for the older LAPIC timer in it's newer kernels, it looks like Leopard might only run on the few machines that support HPET. I doubt with att the new OS changes Leopard will run straight out of the box with an older darwin kernel, not to mention it probably won't see any of the new speed boosts. Not to say it won't ever work on older hardware, but this looks to be a major hurdle to getting 10.5 running on a hackintosh. For those who can run the Leopard kernel, general hardware compatability should be improved with the new towers, and perhaps the new kext's will be backwards compatable.

 

the site you wanted is www.alkyproject.com, a group working on an emulation free binary conversion tool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

isnt quarts extreme already a part of the OS? I have my hackintosh here that says Quarts Extreme: Enabled

Core Image: Enabled

and my hackintosh is pretty much an exact match for the mac mini intel except i have a p4 not a core solo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

does Leopard will run on G3,G4 and G5 ? like Tiger was fasther and Panther and Panther faster than Jaguar.

G3, as slow as you may think, they are still decent machine.

 

 

also, does anyone got their hands on a developer preview?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...