Jump to content
1469 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Quoted from the OiNK forums:

 

Well, we have a problem.

 

I have a buddy who is an indie games developer who attended WWDC and received a copy of the Leopard beta. The problem is, he says there is a rumor floating around about Apple 'watermarking' each copy of Leopard with a software watermark. I have checked with another friend who works at Apple in Cupertino and he refused to confirm or deny it. He is on the iTunes team though, so he may not know anything about it.

 

The idea is that each disk has a unique string of characters hidden away in some plist or something that is reported to an ADC server when installed (similar to Mac hardware serials being registered with Apple).

 

The theory behind that idea is that when it is leaked, Apple will be able to identify the offending disk, go back and check the names of users set up at installation against the name of developers (whoever leaks it would also plan on installing and using it) and finding their culprit. It also theorized that even without a proper name (or a faked name by pirated copies of the operating system) Apple will be able to ask developers to submit to running an application (similar to WGA) that would report back the unique watermark on their system, thus proving them innocent or incriminating them.

 

That may not be enough to really prevent a leak, but it is food for thought. My buddy refuses to even allow me to use his disk to install a copy, for fear of lawsuit like last year's leaker faced.

I don't think Apple is doing that sending thing to Servers... if they do, they're violating privacity; 99% of the company that did this in a hidden way has been kicked to the court.

This can only happens if you register or something like; for example, when you at the end of the instal, when the first screen, you type your apple member and things then nex, then it say "Connecting to apple.." maybe at that point, ok, but you hit OK.. But not in a hidden way... Also, this part can be jumped out. :P it's stupid form their side to keep hidding the beta; its better for them, because people knows about the os, and when its out, every one will buy it; its gonna be cheaper.. in my case, ill buy for sure, but first I NEED TO TRY !!!

:(

Given that the WWDC DVDs were handed out randomly to anyone showing a badge I seriously doubt the watermarking rumor. If there was a strict sign-in process I might give it more than a shred of thought.... nope, doesn't pass the sniff test.

I think there's and easy way to confirm this.

Install it but disconnect from the internet during the whole installation and account setup process (and do not register to apple), after it is installed, install little snitch then connect back to the internet to see if something bad happens.

 

and if this was true i think it would be easy to disable by just editing you hosts file to point apple.com to 127.0.0.1

Given that the WWDC DVDs were handed out randomly to anyone showing a badge I seriously doubt the watermarking rumor. If there was a strict sign-in process I might give it more than a shred of thought.... nope, doesn't pass the sniff test.

 

 

But don't you have to sign your name when you purchase a ticket to WWDC?

it doesnt really matter. if the discs weren't in something that has your name on it, then apple doesn't know what disc went to who. thats like drawing a number out of a hat and saying that they can trace you by what number you pulled...there's no way its possible. we just need someone to confirm that the discs weren't handed out in a REALLY orderly fashion.

You can put what you want; you dont need to be connected to internet. All osx version works this way.. BTW i've tested the previous leopard, wthout the new finder and things.. it worked, but lots of bugs; ichat problems, and well unusable (and still tiger)... I did this without being connected, no problems at all.. AND I NEVER HEARD OF ANY ONE HAD PROBLEMS TO SHARE PREVIOUS LEOPARD!

ITs just scared child things. Its just a beta software, common....

Ok but if the original owner of the disc didn't fill out that info then it would be ok. But seriously do they expect a large developer company such as wolfram or something do they really expect these people to only install leopard on one machine to do development and test? As a software developer that is just rediculous.

This same "watermarking" rumour makes the rounds every time a new and desireable piece of Apple software comes out. I've heard this {censored} after EVERY WWDC, and every other Apple meeting where software was discussed or distributed. It is pretty mucfh impossible to tie a given user to a given disk... Plus have them ready to hand out to folks - come on folks - use your heads...

Im sure the same developer that sharde leopard before, went the WWDC again; and, did any one heard about anybody that was sent to jail because steve said: "WE GOT YOU, WE WAS MONITORING ALL LEOPARDS AND WE SAW YOU GAVE IT! MUAHAHAHAHAHA"... hahahahahah

ITS BEEETAAAA SOFTWAREEEEEE

The same theory about watermarked DVDs came up with the Tiger x86 beta discs too, two years ago. That was a much, much hotter release. But was it true? No.

 

There is a simple way to see if every Leopard DVD is equal: Just get the hash code of two images and you will see if they are exactly the same. And if they are the same, then no tracing can be made.

if they really wanted to stop people they should have just done what they did with Logic Pro with the USB key. Other than that there has been very little anti piracy implementations on previous Apple software so why would they start now and the software that has always had the least anti piracy moves. Just doesn't make sense imho.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...