alloutmacstoday Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 see this Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/39810-isnt-this-illegal/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
alloutmacstoday Posted January 24, 2007 Author Share Posted January 24, 2007 Also this this is also probably just fake, becuase it looks like the tiger install dvd Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/39810-isnt-this-illegal/#findComment-284055 Share on other sites More sharing options...
curlyboy Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 Still very highly illegal tho lol Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/39810-isnt-this-illegal/#findComment-284069 Share on other sites More sharing options...
frizbot Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 10.5 isn't illegal, though a contract has almost certainly been breached. Distributing OS X86 may be illegal in some countries, but it is copyright infringement in the sane ones. Similar to "illegal", but a part of tort law rather than criminal. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/39810-isnt-this-illegal/#findComment-284127 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac-mini Posted January 28, 2007 Share Posted January 28, 2007 Also this this is also probably just fake, becuase it looks like the tiger install dvd thats no tiger install dvd its a dvd with a label on it notice the x86 part on it Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/39810-isnt-this-illegal/#findComment-287420 Share on other sites More sharing options...
alloutmacstoday Posted January 28, 2007 Author Share Posted January 28, 2007 i know, but they probably added that, or else they used lightscribe on real X86 dvd Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/39810-isnt-this-illegal/#findComment-287430 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DsurioN Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Might have been one of those developer builds apple released when they were porting os x to intel - before they released intel macs, they sent out PC development kits with this version of os x (i believe) Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/39810-isnt-this-illegal/#findComment-288718 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conan Obrien Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Might have been one of those developer builds apple released when they were porting os x to intel - before they released intel macs, they sent out PC development kits with this version of os x (i believe) the osx86 disc? that is not a developer disc Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/39810-isnt-this-illegal/#findComment-288736 Share on other sites More sharing options...
alloutmacstoday Posted January 30, 2007 Author Share Posted January 30, 2007 oh, actually, that would make sense, like intel x86, but it does say "Run Mac on a PC" Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/39810-isnt-this-illegal/#findComment-288737 Share on other sites More sharing options...
abcslayer Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 It looks like JaS/Myzar/Tubgirl/etc iso burned + LightScribed disc. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/39810-isnt-this-illegal/#findComment-288744 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mifki Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Yup, lightscribed Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/39810-isnt-this-illegal/#findComment-288748 Share on other sites More sharing options...
alloutmacstoday Posted January 30, 2007 Author Share Posted January 30, 2007 as i said before yes lightscribe, that's the only way to get that good quality, but, the funny thing is, even though no one bought it, it wasn't taken down, nor was the leo, you'd think apple or someone'd take it down Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/39810-isnt-this-illegal/#findComment-288751 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts