8car Posted November 25, 2018 Share Posted November 25, 2018 3 minutes ago, KGP-iMacPro said: Did you properly adopt and add TSCAdjustReset.kext sure. added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8car Posted November 25, 2018 Share Posted November 25, 2018 43 minutes ago, KGP-iMacPro said: Did you properly adopt and add TSCAdjustReset.kext I have double E5-2683 v3 . 28 core and 56 thread , IOCPUNumber has already set to 55. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Multisaft Posted December 5, 2018 Share Posted December 5, 2018 (edited) does anyone solved XCPM implementation on an 5820k? Ive followed most closly the E.1) steps described. Bios settings with latest microcode patch for my Asrock X99m Extreme4, Bios settings Advanced\CPU Configuration\CPU Power Management Configuration\ Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST): disabled) Turbo mode: Enabled CPU C-State: Enabled Enhanced C1 State: Enabled CPU C3 Report: Enabled CPU C6 Report: Enabled Package C State Limit: C6(non Retention) state a) there is no locked msr register on my asrock x99m extreme4, so no kernelpm and no xcpm core scope msrs pike r patch, b) added the fakecpu id 0x0306F2 c) active d) active e) active f) also active PluginType in SSDT Patch update 3 now with speedstep, EIST Performance FIX for Broadwell-E and Haswell-E is different: Broadwell-E FIND C1E30848 63D389D0 48C1EA20 B9990100 000F3048 FF05B38F 76004883 C4085B5D C30F1F40 00 REPLACE B800FF00 004863D3 89D048C1 EA20B999 0100000F 3048FF05 B38F7600 4883C408 5B5DC390 90 Haswell-E FIND C1E30848 63D389D0 48C1EA20 B9990100 000F3048 FF05938D 76004883 C4085B5D C30F1F40 00 Replace BB00FF00 004863D3 89D048C1 EA20B999 0100000F 3048FF05 93AE7600 4883C408 5B5DC390 90 Still I dont think im done with XCPM Performance Geekbench 4 Results with 5820k at 4GHz low, and intel power gadget cpu frequency curve is low: P-States etc: USB In addition, can someone help me with my board-specific XHC USB kext for Asrock X99m Extreme4? OLD SCREENSHOTS Edited December 8, 2018 by Multisaft 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Multisaft Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 Any help around? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KGP-iMacPro Posted December 10, 2018 Author Share Posted December 10, 2018 On 12/5/2018 at 11:25 AM, Multisaft said: does anyone solved XCPM implementation on an 5820k? Ive followed most closly the E.1) steps described. Bios settings with latest microcode patch for my Asrock X99m Extreme4, Bios settings Advanced\CPU Configuration\CPU Power Management Configuration\ Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST): disabled) Turbo mode: Enabled CPU C-State: Enabled Enhanced C1 State: Enabled CPU C3 Report: Enabled CPU C6 Report: Enabled Package C State Limit: C6(non Retention) state a) there is no locked msr register on my asrock x99m extreme4, so no kernelpm and no xcpm core scope msrs pike r patch, b) added the fakecpu id 0x0306F2 c) active d) active e) active f) also active PluginType in SSDT Patch update 3 now with speedstep, EIST Performance FIX for Broadwell-E and Haswell-E is different: Broadwell-E FIND C1E30848 63D389D0 48C1EA20 B9990100 000F3048 FF05B38F 76004883 C4085B5D C30F1F40 00 REPLACE B800FF00 004863D3 89D048C1 EA20B999 0100000F 3048FF05 B38F7600 4883C408 5B5DC390 90 Haswell-E FIND C1E30848 63D389D0 48C1EA20 B9990100 000F3048 FF05938D 76004883 C4085B5D C30F1F40 00 Replace BB00FF00 004863D3 89D048C1 EA20B999 0100000F 3048FF05 93AE7600 4883C408 5B5DC390 90 Still I dont think im done with XCPM Performance Geekbench 4 Results with 5820k at 4GHz low, and intel power gadget cpu frequency curve is low: P-States etc: USB In addition, can someone help me with my board-specific XHC USB kext for Asrock X99m Extreme4? OLD SCREENSHOTS 1.) You have SMT_scope_msrs1 enabled twice. KGP-D1.2_e_xcpm_SMT-scope_msr1 is certainly not the patch of my 10.14 EFI-Folder and is wrong! 2.) Also KGP_d1.2_10.13_xcpm_pkg_scope and KGP_d1.2_10.13_xcpm_pkg_scope are not from my 10.14 EFi-Folder and are wrong! The correct patch is xcpm_pkg-scope_msrs, which you disabled! 3.) Up to my knowledge there is just one common performance patch valid for both Broadwell-E and Haswell-E. The correct performance patch for 10.14.2 is: Find: C1E3084863D389D048C1EA20B9990100000F3048FF05C37276004883C4085B5DC30F1F4000 Repl: B800FF00004863D389D048C1EA20B9990100000F3048FF05C37276004883C4085B5DC39090 4.) You do not need the cupid_set_info kernel patch. Hope this helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Multisaft Posted December 15, 2018 Share Posted December 15, 2018 On 12/10/2018 at 7:38 PM, KGP-iMacPro said: 1.) You have SMT_scope_msrs1 enabled twice. KGP-D1.2_e_xcpm_SMT-scope_msr1 is certainly not the patch of my 10.14 EFI-Folder and is wrong! 2.) Also KGP_d1.2_10.13_xcpm_pkg_scope and KGP_d1.2_10.13_xcpm_pkg_scope are not from my 10.14 EFi-Folder and are wrong! The correct patch is xcpm_pkg-scope_msrs, which you disabled! 3.) Up to my knowledge there is just one common performance patch valid for both Broadwell-E and Haswell-E. The correct performance patch for 10.14.2 is: Find: C1E3084863D389D048C1EA20B9990100000F3048FF05C37276004883C4085B5DC30F1F4000 Repl: B800FF00004863D389D048C1EA20B9990100000F3048FF05C37276004883C4085B5DC39090 4.) You do not need the cupid_set_info kernel patch. Hope this helps. Hi KGP, thanks for your feedback. Ive gone through your recommendations ones more and disabled my kerneltopatch entries which I found for haswell-E in various topics (insanelymac.com, most of them from nmano): with your recommended patches i dont get xcpm speedsteping on 10.14.1, this is the bootstraß patch, the performance patch and smt scope 1/2 patches you recommend in your tutorial. my geekbench score is at the level I would say is max. for 4gh 5820k with slow 32gb ddr4 2133 mhz ram, but the cpu does not idle anymore, all the time full 4ghz frequency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KGP-iMacPro Posted December 15, 2018 Author Share Posted December 15, 2018 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Multisaft said: Hi KGP, thanks for your feedback. Ive gone through your recommendations ones more and disabled my kerneltopatch entries which I found for haswell-E in various topics (insanelymac.com, most of them from nmano): with your recommended patches i dont get xcpm speedsteping on 10.14.1, this is the bootstraß patch, the performance patch and smt scope 1/2 patches you recommend in your tutorial. my geekbench score is at the level I would say is max. for 4gh 5820k with slow 32gb ddr4 2133 mhz ram, but the cpu does not idle anymore, all the time full 4ghz frequency. Because you have to change the bootstrap patch to Haswell-E! The one implemented in my EFI-Folder distrubution is for Broadwell-E! I told you that the correct bootstrap patch for Haswell-E and further guidelines for the 5820K you can find in the README.md of my X99 EFI-Folder repository! Edited December 15, 2018 by KGP-iMacPro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Multisaft Posted December 15, 2018 Share Posted December 15, 2018 1 hour ago, KGP-iMacPro said: Because you have to change the bootstrap patch to Haswell-E! The one implemented in my EFI-Folder distrubution is for Broadwell-E! I told you that the correct bootstrap patch for Haswell-E and further guidelines for the 5820K you can find in the README.md of my X99 EFI-Folder repository! Hi KGP ok next round after update to 10.14.2 with fakecpuid 0x0306F2 1) cpuid_set_info disabled 2) xcpm_bootstrap haswell-e enabled (from your readme.md on x99 repository 3) xcpm_performance_patch for 10.14.2 as posted above enabled 4) smt_scope_msrs 1/2 enabled 5) xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs enabled no with xcpm mode 1 but just base frequency. the cpu does push to higher frequencies after boot: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KGP-iMacPro Posted December 15, 2018 Author Share Posted December 15, 2018 Just now, Multisaft said: Hi KGP ok next round after update to 10.14.2 with fakecpuid 0x0306F2 1) cpuid_set_info disabled 2) xcpm_bootstrap haswell-e enabled (from your readme.md on x99 repository 3) xcpm_performance_patch for 10.14.2 as posted above enabled 4) smt_scope_msrs 1/2 enabled 5) xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs enabled no with xcpm mode 1 but just base frequency. the cpu does push to higher frequencies after boot: But the CPU goes above 4 GHz.. Show IPG snapshot for CPU IDLE and CPU max. Load (2-3 cinebench runs) conditions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Multisaft Posted December 15, 2018 Share Posted December 15, 2018 (edited) 18 minutes ago, KGP-iMacPro said: But the CPU goes above 4 GHz.. Show IPG snapshot for CPU IDLE and CPU max. Load (2-3 cinebench runs) conditions! yes right at startup the cpu goes to 4ghz and than idles back as all the chrome windows etc. are loaded. sorry what is an IPG snapshot? cinebench does not wake the cpu up: appleintelinfo does not find pstates of 40 etc.: also switched to a sapphire pulse rx580 8GB, but no displayport out, only hdmi 30hz 4k (i know i need to follow your instructions on that). CPU is unkown: Edited December 15, 2018 by Multisaft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KGP-iMacPro Posted December 15, 2018 Author Share Posted December 15, 2018 1 minute ago, Multisaft said: yes right at startup the cpu goes to 4ghz and than idles back as all the chrome windows etc. are loaded. cinebench does not wake the cpu up: appleintelinfo does not find pstates of 40 etc.: Plugintype checked in config.plist? TSCAdjustReset.kext in EFI-Folder? Revise BIOS settings and play enabling, disabling the xcpm patches. You do have different board but also CPU. I cannot help you further. However, there are several people successfully running the 5820K based on my guidelines. Good luck, KGP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Multisaft Posted December 16, 2018 Share Posted December 16, 2018 (edited) 18 hours ago, KGP-iMacPro said: Plugintype checked in config.plist? TSCAdjustReset.kext in EFI-Folder? Revise BIOS settings and play enabling, disabling the xcpm patches. You do have different board but also CPU. I cannot help you further. However, there are several people successfully running the 5820K based on my guidelines. Good luck, KGP Yes Plugintype is checked (activated), TSCAdjustReset.kext is patched to 11 in accordance to your guide (12-1). I always had problems with the X99M under el capitan, maybe its time to switch. I've bought an used X99-A II, I will start from scratch when it arrives. Edited December 16, 2018 by Multisaft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsme001 Posted December 18, 2018 Share Posted December 18, 2018 Hi KGP,i have same problem like Multisaft i use your guide since 10.12. my hardware 2696v3(haswell ep) asrock x99 taichi xcpm is loaded,pstate ok(12-38).bios patched. update from 10.13.2 to 10.14.2 with your guide. all cpu core will lock to 1.2Ghz after pc run some hours. if i disable xcpm bootstrap patch,xcpm won't load,all core lock to 2.8Ghz. if i use xcpm performance patch and xcpm msr patch in this post the cpu freq will vary from 1.2 to 2.8,even i force run some heaveload program(cb r15),there may some core still keep 1.2-2.0.this make cb r15 score vary from 1000-2000(normal is 1900-2100) points in multi test. make me feel like i'm using a 18 cores low freq notebook... i think haswell-ep need another eist performance patch or xcpm msr patch.but these info is too less. does anyone else with haswell-ep has cpu freq issue? i'm not use this pc now,if u have time,need some info to help,i'll post info late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsme001 Posted December 18, 2018 Share Posted December 18, 2018 as nmano topic, he use haswell 5960x,some kernel patch diff from KGP(use 6950x) guide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KGP-iMacPro Posted December 18, 2018 Author Share Posted December 18, 2018 50 minutes ago, itsme001 said: as nmano topic, he use haswell 5960x,some kernel patch diff from KGP(use 6950x) guide. I clearly outline the differences between Broadwell and Haswell in README.md in my X99 EFI-Folder Github repository. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsme001 Posted December 18, 2018 Share Posted December 18, 2018 1 hour ago, KGP-iMacPro said: I clearly outline the differences between Broadwell and Haswell in README.md in my X99 EFI-Folder Github repository. thanks your reply.i read your guide and git readme carefuly. I'm sure i set the right xcpm_bootstrap,FakeCPUID to haswell ep version(2696v3),disable or not the set_cpu_info patch not influence these. and TSCAdjustRest,bios microcode patch,etc... set to right. in nmano's post, he use C1E3084863D389D048C1EA20B9990100000F3048FF05238376004883C4085B5DC30F1F4000 BB00FF00004863D389D048C1EA20B9990100000F3048FF0593AE76004883C4085B5DC39090 yours C1E3084863D389D048C1EA20B9990100000F3048FF05C37276004883C4085B5DC30F1F4000 B800FF00004863D389D048C1EA20B9990100000F3048FF05C37276004883C4085B5DC39090 the _xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs _xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs 1 & 2 patch is different. your patch will cause my cpu lock to 1.2Ghz after some hours. his patch will cause my cpu freq vary from 1.2-2(half cores),2-2.8(half cores),random,which cause cinebench r15 score vary from 1000-2000.(normal 1900-2100).IGP package freq vary from 1.x to 2.x(below 2.5 even high load...) in your guide post in another forum,i noticed someone(id:torock) use xeon 2660v3 also has same problem(xcpm ok,but freq not stable). I guess some inaccurate kernel to patch entities cause these.and there's no much info about these thing. now my pc like a 18 cores notebook with low freq,not fluence.the performance even worst than my i7 8700(mojave). I consider change cpu to xeon 1680v3|v4.i use recc memory.i need xeon. thanks your nice guide again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KGP-iMacPro Posted December 18, 2018 Author Share Posted December 18, 2018 (edited) 23 minutes ago, itsme001 said: thanks your reply.i read your guide and git readme carefuly. I'm sure i set the right xcpm_bootstrap,FakeCPUID to haswell ep version(2696v3),disable or not the set_cpu_info patch not influence these. and TSCAdjustRest,bios microcode patch,etc... set to right. in nmano's post, he use C1E3084863D389D048C1EA20B9990100000F3048FF05238376004883C4085B5DC30F1F4000 BB00FF00004863D389D048C1EA20B9990100000F3048FF0593AE76004883C4085B5DC39090 yours C1E3084863D389D048C1EA20B9990100000F3048FF05C37276004883C4085B5DC30F1F4000 B800FF00004863D389D048C1EA20B9990100000F3048FF05C37276004883C4085B5DC39090 the _xcpm_pkg_scope_msrs _xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs 1 & 2 patch is different. your patch will cause my cpu lock to 1.2Ghz after some hours. his patch will cause my cpu freq vary from 1.2-2(half cores),2-2.8(half cores),random,which cause cinebench r15 score vary from 1000-2000.(normal 1900-2100).IGP package freq vary from 1.x to 2.x(below 2.5 even high load...) in your guide post in another forum,i noticed someone(id:torock) use xeon 2660v3 also has same problem(xcpm ok,but freq not stable). I guess some inaccurate kernel to patch entities cause these.and there's no much info about these thing. now my pc like a 18 cores notebook with low freq,not fluence.the performance even worst than my i7 8700(mojave). I consider change cpu to xeon 1680v3|v4.i use recc memory.i need xeon. thanks your nice guide again. Well my patches are exactly those of @PMheart. The SMT and pkg_scope patches are different between 10.13 and 10.14. The performance patch nearly changes for each macOS version. Are you sure you are using the correct patches for your macOS version? Between Broadwell and Haswell there is just a difference in the cpu_set_info and bootstrap patch. While both are obsolete for Broadwell-E, some Haswell CPU s still need the bootstrap patch. Else your CPU behavior will also strongly depend on your BIOS settings. If you have locked MSR, you also need to enable the core scope patch. I guess you already considered all these advices. Unfortunately, I am not able to provide further help in this case. With my i7-6950X everything works flawless with the patches implemented in my respective EFI-Folders. I can absolutely exclude that some of the patches do not meet the requirements. Good luck, KGP Edited December 18, 2018 by KGP-iMacPro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsme001 Posted December 18, 2018 Share Posted December 18, 2018 (edited) 52 minutes ago, KGP-iMacPro said: Well my patches are exactly those of @PMheart. The SMT and pkg_scope patches are different between 10.13 and 10.14. The performance patch nearly changes for each macOS version. Are you sure you are using the correct patches for your macOS version? Between Broadwell and Haswell there is just a difference in the cpu_set_info and bootstrap patch. While both are obsolete for Broadwell-E, some Haswell CPU s still need the bootstrap patch. Else your CPU behavior will also strongly depend on your BIOS settings. If you have locked MSR, you also need to enable the core scope patch. I guess you already considered all these advices. Unfortunately, I am not able to provide further help in this case. With my i7-6950X everything works flawless with the patches implemented in my respective EFI-Folders. I can absolutely exclude that some of the patches do not meet the requirements. Good luck, KGP thanks for your reply. i use the right version performance patch for 10.14.2.follow your guide carefully. asrock x99 taichi,has no msr lock.so i don't need core scope patch and clover kernelpm config. you confirm your kernel patch i'll try your guide sometime(may next version) i search the web find some guys(three-five use xeon v3) have similar performance problem(xcpm loaded,cpu freq not stable,lower bench score).later if u known someone use xeon 26xx v3 suceess without performance problem.could you post it in your guide.then i know it's some fault in my config.i'll check my setup even consider a clean install. thanks for your help. Edited December 18, 2018 by itsme001 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Veteran Posted December 24, 2018 Share Posted December 24, 2018 Well thanks to this aweson guide well prepared and the TIME consume of this elite member, after a while my self been inactive on the Hackintosh hobbit, I got a succesed results first shot with this guide, it can not be no more precise of what it is already. Thanks a lot KGP for your kindness. GB3-3925-61953 SS-1 SS-2 SS-3 SS-4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Veteran Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 (edited) Well on GB-4 on Mojave I got a pretty preatty good result I think, in comparison the one I got in Sierra withe the same system setup. I never test this this system with High Sierra cause I was out of the hobbit for a while, but this are the results for Mojave. SIERRA GB4-4472-5139 Mojave Edited December 29, 2018 by The Veteran Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phichau90113 Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 Hello I'm Using Cpu E5 2678 v3 2.5ghz with HP z640 cpu full load but not turbo, however, I'm enable _xcpm_cpuid_set_info © Pike R. Alpha, _xcpm_bootstrap © Pike R. Alpha but cpu not turbo plz help me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Multisaft Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Hi Guys, short feedback, I've updated to the X99-A II and it looks like XCPM with 5820k cpu work flawless. sadly the sapphire pulse rx580 does not work the way I expected it. Just HDMI does work and my Philipps 40" does not support 4k at 60Hz over HDMI (old version), and all the Displayport 1.2 solutions do not work as well (yes I used the RX580.aml). So Sleep/wake issues are also present (black screen problem). I decided to invest even further as I need this workstation for both (WIN as well as Mac) and ordered a PowerColor Radeon RX Vega 56 Red Dragon. I hope that this will fix my Displayport as well as sleep/wake issues. I just want to thank KGP for his support and all the other guys for such incredible easy to install hackintoshes. I'm around in this community for a long time (not as active as some others) and did my first x86 on an Asus P6T-SE with Core i7-920 and holy this was a messup to get OS X running. What a difference it is today when you just stick to hardware used from our community! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Multisaft Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 ok now with powercolor vega56 red dragon and without displayport 1.2 connection to my 40", so no 4k@60hz. and not even 4k@30hz. with hdmi, 4k@30hz is possible for my tries: 1. try: just added your vega56 ssdt implementation, this resulted in massive fanspeeds due to your oc and fan control settings, I guess. with or without whatevergreen.kext no displayport connection. 2. try: deleted everythin, your ssdt implementation, now still no displayport connection, idle fan control works with 0rpm in idle but under load normal vega problems with high fan speeds and no reversion back to low fan speeds or zero fan speed. so I googled and found the various informations in tonymacs about VGTab control. there, I understood, that I dont have my Vega56 on GFX0, I searched in my config.plist that I used from your folder KGP and found that the change GFX0 to IGPU was enabled in the dsdt patching section. I disabled it, but still there is no GFX0 found from gfxutil (also from tonymacs support sites). Now I'm lost. Next idea: update lilu and whatevergreen in recommendation from the VGTab guide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KGP-iMacPro Posted January 10, 2019 Author Share Posted January 10, 2019 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Multisaft said: ok now with powercolor vega56 red dragon and without displayport 1.2 connection to my 40", so no 4k@60hz. and not even 4k@30hz. with hdmi, 4k@30hz is possible for my tries: 1. try: just added your vega56 ssdt implementation, this resulted in massive fanspeeds due to your oc and fan control settings, I guess. with or without whatevergreen.kext no displayport connection. 2. try: deleted everythin, your ssdt implementation, now still no displayport connection, idle fan control works with 0rpm in idle but under load normal vega problems with high fan speeds and no reversion back to low fan speeds or zero fan speed. so I googled and found the various informations in tonymacs about VGTab control. there, I understood, that I dont have my Vega56 on GFX0, I searched in my config.plist that I used from your folder KGP and found that the change GFX0 to IGPU was enabled in the dsdt patching section. I disabled it, but still there is no GFX0 found from gfxutil (also from tonymacs support sites). Now I'm lost. Next idea: update lilu and whatevergreen in recommendation from the VGTab guide I really do not understand at all what you are doing.. Vega56 SSDT has no loadtable. No OC! Everybody runs Vega56 SSDT + Whatevergreen without any issues including fully functional display ports! I clearly recommend to use VGTab app for the application of custom vega settings by creating a custom load table to be inplemented within the SSDT! In my config plist there is nothing enabled in the graphics section and there is certainly no change from GFX0 to IGPU implemented or enabled! Seems that you already totally messed up my predefined EFI-Folder. I really would recommend to start from scratch in your case. Good luck Edited January 10, 2019 by KGP-iMacPro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Multisaft Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 (edited) On 1/10/2019 at 6:31 PM, KGP-iMacPro said: I really do not understand at all what you are doing.. Vega56 SSDT has no loadtable. No OC! Everybody runs Vega56 SSDT + Whatevergreen without any issues including fully functional display ports! I clearly recommend to use VGTab app for the application of custom vega settings by creating a custom load table to be inplemented within the SSDT! In my config plist there is nothing enabled in the graphics section and there is certainly no change from GFX0 to IGPU implemented or enabled! Seems that you already totally messed up my predefined EFI-Folder. I really would recommend to start from scratch in your case. Good luck good morning KGP, I really do not understand what I'm doing different to others, too! :-D But after my last post I did what I written down, updated to the latest Lilu, without any Vega56 SSDT but with Whatevergreen.kext and now I'm on 4k@60Hz and with GFX0. As I had run out of time yesterday, I will follow your SSDT Vega 56 implementation today and will retest yours as well as creating my own (undervolting and Idle fan speeds etc. - just as I like to do it on my own as it interests me). What I read in the VGTab tutorial, there are users reporting issues using the kext created from VGTab in combination with the whatevergreen.kext (failed boot procedures). Is that the reason you implemented the various correct OC and fan-settings for vega in your ssdt implementation? I will give you a screenshot of the config plist I downloaded (with date of download), it is the config I downloaded from your first post in this thread and which I used to clearly had no problem creating a USB installer as well as taking the first steps in the clean Mojave install. I don't think that I totally messed up my EFI-Folder, I just updated in accordance to your guide. I can upload my config.plist if you like to or if you want to recheck if I failed in other steps :-D To be honest I have absolutely no problem with the fact that I run into some minor issues, that helps me to understand what we are doing with our installations. Regarding the Vega56 SSDT, can you tell me if you undervolted P5-P7 and how I can change your SSDT to 0rpm fanspeed at idle? Benchmarks Update: when I use your Vega56 SSDT with GFX0, there is no 0rpm fanspeed at idle. Can you give me a hint how to fix this? I see 1.61GHz GPU clocks as well as 900MHz GPU Ram speeds. that is nice, looks like you undervolted? In addition, I found out that my pkg Power delivery is not monitored in intel power gadget. See attached my config.plist and screenshots. Luxmark gives me even 1.65GHz at GPU speed, nice. CONFIG PLIST config.plist here my vega56 SSDT SSDT-X99-Vega56.aml undervolted and oced to 1.66ghz with 900mhz ram clock, lowest possible idle rpm (0rpm does not work?) results almost the same as above Edited January 15, 2019 by Multisaft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts